Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 4 no. 11 (2023)

Model of Strengthening Halal Branding as an Implementation of Wellness Economy for MSMEs in Jember Regency

Moh Adenan | Umi Cholifah | Susanti Prasetiyaningtiyas | Deasy Wulandari | N. Ari Subagio | Fajar Wahyu Prianto

 

Abstract:

The new lifestyle of the people that emerged as a result of the Covid19 Pandemic which emphasizes the importance of a healthy lifestyle also influences economic and social activities in implementing the wellness economy. Healthy food can be traced from raw materials, processes, finished products and physical presentation to hygiene and in the concept of sharia it is called halal food which legally has a halal certificate. The purpose of this study was to identify MSMEs that already have halal certificates, analyze challenges and opportunities, analyze the effect of halal branding on sales, and formulate a model for strengthening MSME halal branding in Jember Regency. The method used is the Mix Method, beginning with a qualitative descriptive with secondary data collection, observation, and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The results obtained are about 8, There are 764 MSMEs in Jember Regency and only 5% are halal certified. The minimum number of MSMEs that have halal certificates is because there are obstacles such as a lack of understanding of registration procedures, too many registration requirements, small businesses, time constraints.



References:

  1. Aarnos, E. & Perkkila, P. (2012). Early signs of mathematics anxiety?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 46, 1495-1499. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.328
  2. Ahearn E. P. (1997). The use of visual analog scales in mood disorders: a critical re-view. Journal of Psychiatric Re-search, 31(5), 569–579. doi:10.1016/s0022-3956(97)00029-0
  3. Alwin, D. F., Baumgartner, E. M., & Beattie, B. A. (2018). Number of response categories and reliability in attitude measure-ment. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 6(2), 212-239.
  4. Ashcraft, M.H., & Ridley, K.S. (2005). Math anx-iety and its cognitive consequences: A tu-torial review. In J.I.D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Cognition (pp. 315-327). Psychology Press.
  5. Bradford, W.C. (2011). Reaching the Visual Learner: Teaching Property Through Art. Social Science Research Network 11.
  6. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliabil-ity and validity assessment. Sage Univer-sity Paper 17. Beverly Hills: Sage Publica-tions.
  7. Chang, H., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). The math anxiety-math performance link and its re-lation to individual and environmental factors: A review of current behavioral and psychophysiological re-search. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 10, 33-38. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.011
  8. Child, D. (1975). The essentials of factor analy-sis. Billing & Sons Ltd., Guilford and Lon-don.
  9. Cipora, K., & Nuerk, H.C. (2019). Different ways to measure math anxiety. In I.C. Mammarella, S. Caviola, & A. Dowker (Eds.), Mathematics anxiety: What is known and what is still to be understood (pp 20-41). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.4324/9780429199981-2
  10. Clarke, P. R. F. (1964). Reliability and sensitivi-ty in the self-assessment of well-being. Bulletin of the British Psychologi-cal Society, 17, 55.
  11. Dreger, R.M. & Aiken, L.R. (1957). The identi-fication of number anxiety in a college population. Journal of Educational Psy-chology 48(6), 344-351. doi:10.1037/h0045894
  12. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  13. Furner, J. M. & Higgins, C. (2019). Empowering teacher leadership to address math anxi-ety in today’s schools. Transformations 5(1). Retrieved at https://nsuworks.nova.edu/transformations/vol5/iss1/2
  14. Gaskin, C., Lambert, S., Bowe, S., & Orellana, L. (2017). Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: Implications for the 12-item World Health Organiza-tion disability assessment schedule 2.0. BMC Medical Research Methodology 17(40). doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0309-5
  15. Gierl, M.J., & Bisanz, J. (1995). Anxieties and attitudes related to mathematics in grades 3 and 6. Journal of Experimental Education 63(2), 139-158. doi:10.1080/00220973.1995.9943818
  16. Gough. M.F. (1954). Why failures in mathemat-ics? Mathemaphobia: Causes and treat-ments. Journal of Education Strategies, Is-sues and Ideas 28(5), 290-294. doi:10.1080/00098655.1954.11476830
  17. Hasson, D. & Arnetz, B. (2005). Validation and findings comparing VAS vs. Likert scales for psychosocial measurements. Interna-tional Electronic Journal of Health Educa-tion 2, 178-192.
  18. Hopko, D.R. et al. (2003). The abbreviated math anxiety scale (AMAS): Construction, validity, and reliability. SAGE Journals 10(2). doi:10.1177/107319113010002008
  19. Huck, S. (2007). Reform in statistical educa-tion. Psychology in the Schools 44. 527 - 533. doi:10.1002/pits.20244
  20. Ilgen, J. S., Hatala, R. & Cook. D.A. (2015). A systematic review of validity evidence for checklist versus global rating scales in simulation-based assessment. Medical Education 42(2), 161-173. doi:10.1111/medu.12621
  21. Jacoby, J., & Matell, M. (1971). Three-point Likert scales are good enough. SAGE Journals 8(4). doi:10.1177/002224377100800414
  22. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of elec-tronic computers to factor analysis. Edu-cational and Psychological Measurement 20(1), 141-151. doi:10.1177/001316446002000116
  23. Kuhlmann, T., Dantlgraber, M. & Reips, UD. Investigating measurement equivalence of visual analogue scales and Likert-type scales in Internet-based personality ques-tionnaires. Behav Res 49, 2173–2181 (2017). doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0850-x
  24. Legg, A., & Locker, L. (2009). Math perfor-mance and its relationship to math anxie-ty and metacognition. North American Journal of Psychology(11), 471-485.
  25. Morris, L. W., & Liebert, R. M. (1970). Rela-tionship of cognitive and emotional com-ponents of test anxiety to physiological arousal and academic perfor-mance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35(3), 332–337. doi:10.1037/h0030132
  26. Nuñez-Peña, M.I., Guilera, G., & Suarez Pelli-cioni, M. (2014). The single-item math anxiety scale: An alternative way of measuring mathematical anxiety. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 32, 306-317. doi:10.1177/0734282913508528
  27. Osteras, N., Gulbrandsen, P., Garratt, A., Benth, J., Dahl, F. Natvig, B., & Brage, S. (2008). A randomized comparison of a four- and a five-point scale version of the Norwegian function assessment scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6(14). doi:10.1186/1477-7525-6-14
  28. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
  29. Pizzie, R. (2021). Mind, Brain, and Math Anxie-ty. In: Danesi, M. (eds) Handbook of Cog-nitive Mathematics. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_29-1
  30. Plake, B.S., & Parker, C.S. (1982). The devel-opment and validation of a revised ver-sion of the mathematics anxiety rating scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement 42(2), 551-557. doi:10.1177/001316448204200218
  31. Rezende, N & Medeiros, D. (2022). How rating scales influence responses’ reliability, ex-treme points, middle point and respond-ent’s preferences. Journal of Business Re-search (138), 266-274. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.031
  32. Richardson, F.C. & Suinn, R.M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psy-chometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology 19(6), 551-554. doi:10.1037/h0033456
  33. Rubinsten, O., & Tannock, R. (2010). Mathe-matics anxiety in children with develop-mental dyscalculia. Behavioral and Brain Functions: BBF 6(46). doi:10.1186/1744-9081-6-46
  34. Scarpello, G. (2007). Helping students get past math anxiety. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers 82.
  35. Shahid, A., Wilkinson, K., Marcu, S., & Shapiro, C. (2011). Visual analogue scale to evalu-ate fatigue severity (VAS-F). STOP, THAT and one hundred other sleep scales. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9893-4_100
  36. Suinn, R.M., & Edwards, R. (1982). The meas-urement of mathematics anxiety: The mathematics anxiety rating scale for ado-lescents – MARS-A. Journal of Clinical Psychology 38(3), 576-580. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198207)38:3<576::AID-JCLP2270380317>3.0.CO;2-V
  37. Suinn, R.M., Taylor, S., & Edwards, R. (1988). Suinn mathematics anxiety rating scale for elementary school students (MARS-E): Psychometric and Normative Data. Educational and Psychological Measure-ment 48(4), 979-986. doi:10.117/0013164488484013
  38. Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument: How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Ac-ademic Research in Management 5(3), 28-36. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3205040
  39. Udil, P. A., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Riyadi (2017). Profile of mathematics anxiety of 7th graders. AIP Conference Proceedings 1868(1). doi:10.1063/1.4995144
  40. Vargas, Rafael. (2021). A literature review on math anxiety and learning mathematics: A general overview. Journal of Educa-tional Research and Reviews (9), 102-108. doi:10.33495/jerr_v9i5.21.112
  41. Zakariya, Y.F. (2018). Development of mathe-matics anxiety scale: Factor analysis as a determinant of subcategories. Journal of Pedagogical Research 2(2), 135-144.
  42. Zhang, J., Zhao, N. & Kong, Q.P. (2019). The Relationship Between Math Anxiety and Math Performance: A Meta-Analytic In-vestigation. Frontiers in Psychology 10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01613

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic