Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 4 no. 11 (2023)

Engagement and Learning Success: Evidence from Three Years of Transformational Teaching Strategies in Online Event Marketing Education

Kimberly Christie S. Vergara | Joseph Emil Santos | Angelique C. Blasa Cheng | Maricel S. Balatbat | Raymond Allan G. Vergara

 

Abstract:

This study is part of an ongoing teacher-led initiative in understanding the co-creation of a transformative learning experience in the online event marketing classroom. The study measures the impact of student engagement on student-defined learning success in online learning. Using a mixed methods approach, it investigates data collected through a survey questionnaire in three different years from students who enrolled in two course subjects. This study demonstrates that student engagement is significantly correlated with and predicts learner-defined learning success in online learning. Furthermore, it finds that there were statistically significant differences in levels of student engagement and learning success among different cohorts, particularly when compared to cohorts who took the course subject in the later year. The differences may have been a result of the development of skills appropriate for online learning, and in improvements in course content and delivery.



References:

  1. Barañao, E. L., Mariano, A., Nanit, J. N. V., & Samson, K. C. F. (2022). Distractions and Coping Mechanisms In Blended Learning Of Grade 10 Students In Philippine School Doha, S.y. 2021-2022. IJRP, 1(97). https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp100971320222988
  2. Baterna, H., & Mina. T.D.G., & Rogayan, D.V. Jr. (2020). Digital literacy of STEM senior high school students: Basis for enhance-ment program. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 3(2), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.v3i2.28
  3. Bong, E. Y., & Chatterjee, C. (2021). The Use of a ClassPoint Tool for Student Engage-ment During Online Lesson. In Proceed-ings of the Asian Conference on Educa-tion. https://papers.iafor.org/wp-con-tent/uploads/papers/ace2021/ACE2021_61372.pdf
  4. Bozkurt, A., Karakaya, K., Turk, M. et al. The Impact of COVID-19 on Education: A Me-ta-Narrative Review. TechTrends 66, 883–896 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00759-0
  5. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Re-search in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
  6. Chandini (2016). Attitude of secondary school teachers towards the use of computers in education. International Journal of Cur-rent Research and Modern Education, 1(2), 237-240.
  7. Darayseh, A. (2020). The Impact Of Covid-19 Pandemic On Modes Of Teaching Science In Uae Schools. JEP. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/11-20-13
  8. DeCoito, I., & Richardson, T. (2018). Teachers and technology: Present practice and fu-ture directions. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2), 362-378.
    https://citejournal.org/volume-18/issue-2-18/science/teachers-and-technology-present-practice-and-future-directions/
  9. Donelly, R., Patrinos, H., & Gresham, J. (2021). The Impact of COVID-19 on Education – Recommendations and Opportunities for Ukraine. The World Bank. Retrieved Sep-tember 10, 2023 from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/opinion/2021/04/02/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-education-recommendations-and-opportunities-for-ukraine#:~:text=At%20the%20peak%20of%20the,remote%20learning%20systems%20almost%20immediately.
  10. Dziuban, C. D., & Moskal, P. D. (2004). Blended Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652923.2010.03653.x.
  11. Edwards L (2022) What is Pear Deck and How Does It Work? Tips and Tricks in Teach&Learning
  12. Faber, J. M., C. A. Glas, & Visscher, A. J. (2018). “Differentiated Instruction in a Data-Based DecisionMaking Context.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 29 (1): 43–63.
  13. Gayeta, N. (2019). Technology-oriented Sci-ence Instruction Approaches and Strate-gies. Int. J. Res. Granthaalayah, 5(7), 202-207. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i5.2019.840
  14. Gross, E. (2023). The Impact of Pear Deck on Student Achievement and The Impact of Pear Deck on Student Achievement and Perceptions Perceptions. Retrieved July 7, 2023, from https://nwcommons.nwciowa.edu/cgi/viewcon-tent.cgi?article=1489&context=education_masters
  15. Hoic-Bozic, N., Dlab, M. H., Mornar, V. (2016). Recommender System and Web 2.0 Tools To Enhance A Blended Learning Model. IEEE Trans. Educ., 1(59), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1109/te.2015.2427116
  16. Hussain, I., Shahzad, A., & Ali, R. (2019). Paki-stan Journal of Distance & Online Learn-ing, V(I), 189-208
  17. Johnson, A., Jacovina, M., Russell, D., & Soto, C. (2016). Challenges & solutions when us-ing technologies in the classroom. In S. A. Crossley & D. S. McNamara (Eds.) Adap-tive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 13-29). New York: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647500-2
  18. Kamarulzaman, M. H., Azman, H., Zahidi, A. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). The Practice of Online Differentiated Instruction and Its Impact on Motivation and Academic Per-formance in the Wake of Covid-19.
  19. Ken Akaninwor, G. (1998). Electrical power outages and the teaching and learning process in technical training institutions in rivers state. Department of Science and Technical Education, Rivers State Univer-sity Of Science And Technology, P.M.B. 5080, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
  20. Khader, N. (2016). The Effectiveness of Blend-ed Learning in Improving Students' Achievement in Third Grade's Science in Bani Kenana. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(35).
  21. Kharbach, M. (2022, October 12). What Is Quizizz and How to Use It with Your Stu-dents? - Educators Technology. Educa-torstechnology.com. https://www.educatorstechnology.com/2022/10/what-is-quizizz-and-how-to-use-it-with.html
  22. Kintu, M., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the rela-tionship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. Interna-tional Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14(7), DOI 10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
  23. Leon, F., Matolo, M. (2022). The Effect of Blended Learning Instruction Using Sim-plified Science Module On Students’ Aca-demic Performance. JHED, 6(4), 67-73. https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.4.6.6
  24. Lunden, I. (2018). Education quiz app Kahoot says it’s now used by 50% of all US K-12 students, 70M users overall (Vol. 2019). TechCrunch.
  25. Manes, J., Calimlim, A., & Nalupa-Farin, E. (2022). Acquisition Of Science Process Skills Of Junior High School Students Among Private Schools Of Olongapo City. East African Scholars J Edu Humanit Lit, 6(5), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.36349/easjehl.2022.v05i06.002
  26. Mendoza, A. (2023). Perspectives, Challenges and Coping Mechanisms Of Special Edu-cation Teachers: Basis For An Enhanced Blended Learning Program. AIDE-IRJ, (3), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v3i1.53
  27. New South Wales Website (2023), Assessing Authentically. Unsw.edu.au. https://www.teaching.unsw.edu.au/authentic-assessment
  28. Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can “Blended Learning” Be Redeemed? E-Learning, 2(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005. 2.1.2.
  29. Onyishi C. H. & Sefotho M. M. (2021). Differen-tiating instruction for learners' mathe-matics self-efficacy in inclusive class-rooms: Can learners with dyscalculia also benefit? South African Journal of Educa-tion 41(4). DOI: 10.15700/saje.v41n4a1938
  30. Paje, Y. M., Rogayan, D. V., & Dantic, M. J. P. (2021). Teachers’ utilization of computer-based technology in science instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 5(3), 427-446. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.261
  31. Siew-Eng, L., & Muuk, M. A. (2015). Blended Learning in Teaching Secondary Schools’ English: a Preparation For Tertiary Sci-ence Education In Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, (167), 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.677
  32. Taghap, R. (2023). Barriers to science learning and science academic performance: A case of online learners residing far from school. World Journal of Advanced Re-search and Reviews, 19(01), 1363–1367. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.1.1480
  33. Thomas. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based onself-determination theory. 124, 106909–106909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909
  34. Utami, I. (2017). The effect of blended learning model on senior high school students’ achievement. SHS Web of conference, 42(27). https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200027
  35. Vick, I. (2019). Training professionals from three countries share their Kahoot!’ing experience (Vol. 2019). https://kahoot.com/blog/2019/09/10/top-training-tipskahoot-around-world/:Kahoot!.
  36. Wang, A & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature
  37. Wang, C. (2023). Blended Learning In Physical Education: a Systematic Review. Front. Public Health, (11). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073423

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic