Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 4 no. 11 (2023)

Income Diversification Through Optimization of Service Rates at Universitas Negeri Semarang

Fransiska Novi Kurniasih | Wiwik Widayanti | Tania Wicaksana

 

Abstract:

Improving the quality of education is a complex matter because it is related to technical problems and the planning, administration, funding, management of income sources, diversification of service rates, and effectiveness and efficiency of the education system. Semarang State University (Unnes) is one of the universities still categorized as a Public Service Agency, which is still transforming into a legal entity university (PTNBH). This study aims to determine the income from the current service tariffs, map the potential for additional revenue from available services, and analyze revenue potential by simulating new service tariffs. The method used in this research is qualitative descriptive. The study results show that the management and transparency of easily obtained university budgeting guide data will reduce the risk of budget management. Budget diversification will minimize the risk so that budget management will run more effectively and efficiently. Furthermore, it is known that the service tariffs that have been in effect so far are considered not optimal and can still be developed into the potential for diversifying the Institution's income. That makes it possible to enter work contracts with external parties to optimize revenue potential and better quality management.



References:

  1. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pendidikan Tinggi.
  2. Ariani D (2017) Pengelolaan keuangan perguruan tinggi di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Bisnis
  3. Hamdi H, Hakimi A, Zaghdoudi K (2017) Diversification, performance and risk: Have Tunisian institutes adopted the new business model? J. Financ. Innov. 3(1): 1–25. doi.org/10.1186/s40854-017-0069-6
  4. Rudhianto H, Utami T, Widarjo W (2022) Perbandingan model pola pengelolaan keuangan Perguruan Tinggi Negeri. MON-EX 01: 104–118.
  5. Sugiharti DK (2014) Optimalisasi pengel-olaan dan pemanfaatan aset tanah dan bangunan Perguruan Tinggi Negeri (PTN) yang melaksanakan Pengelolaan Keu-angan Badan Layanan Umum (PK BLU) da-lam rangka meningkatkan pelayanan pen-didikan. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law 1(2): 270–285. doi: 10.22304/pjih.v1n2.a4.
  6. Hamid ML, Christine (2019) Aspek Perpa-jakan Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Hukum (PTNBH) di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan 7(3): 419–432. doi: 10.17509/jrak.v7i3.17553.
  7. Putri RE, Suhairi S, Syofriyeni N (2020) Evaluasi tarif pelayanan badan layanan umum dengan metode unit cost pada Uni-versitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi 20(3): 1093. doi: 10.33087/jiubj.v20i3.1102.
  8. Ramadhan F (2020) PTNBH dan ketid-akmampuannya memanfaatkan penda-naan alternatif. Economica.id. https://www.economica.id/2020/11/24/ptnbh-dan-ketidakmampuannya-memanfaatkan-pendanaan-alternatif/
  9. Andriani DE (2007) Pengembangan sum-ber-sumber pendapatan perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan 2(3): 44–55.
  10. Dwi AI (2010) Penyusunan peraturan Rektor Unesa tentang organisasi kemaha-siswaan, unit kegiatan mahasiswa dan kode etik mahasiswa. INOVATE: Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi dan Informasi X: 1–8.
  11. Majumder MTH, Uddin MJ (2017) The de-terminants of profitability of nationalized in Bangladesh. Int. J. Econ. Bus. Research 13(4): 335-348.
  12. Moudud-Ul-Huq S, Ashraf BN, Gupta AD, Zheng C (2018) Does institute diversifica-tion heterogeneously affect performance and risk-taking in ASEAN emerging econ-omies? Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 46, 342–362.
  13. Gunawan I (2013) Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  14. Lee CC, Hsieh MF, Yang SJ (2014) The rela-tionship between revenue diversification and institute performance: Do financial structures and financial reforms matter? Jap. the World Econ. 29: 18-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.japwor.2013.11.002
  15. Muchson M (2017) Statistik Deskriptif. Spasi Media.
  16. Pennathur AK, Subrahmanyam V, Vish-wasrao,S (2012) Income diversification and risk: Does ownership matter? An em-pirical examination of Indian institutes. J. Institute. Financ. 36: 2203–2215. Doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.03.021
  17. Saghi-Zedek N (2016) Product diversifica-tion and institute performance: Does own-ership structure matter? J. Institute. Fi-nanc. 71: 154-167. Doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.05.003
  18. Nisar S, Peng K, Wang S, Ashraf BN (2018) The impact of revenue diversification on

  19. institute profitability and stability: Empiri-cal evidence from South Asian countries. Int. J. Financ. Stud. 6(2): 40. Doi.org/10.3390/ijfs6020040

  20. Hansen S (2020) Investigasi teknik wa-wancara dalam penelitian kualitatif mana-jemen konstruksi. Jurnal Teoritis dan Te-rapan Bidang Rekayasa Sipil 27: 283.
  21. Murharsito M (2015) The effect of the ownership and the global crisis on the in-come diversification of Indonesian insti-tutes. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perin-stitutean. 17(3): 339. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v17i3.11
  22. Sanya S, Wolfe S (2011) Can institutes in emerging economies benefit from revenue diversification? J. Financ. Serv. Res. 40: 79–101. Doi: 10.1007/s10693-010-0098-z
  23. Sharma SA (2017) Does diversification of income source influence institute’s risk-return characteristics? Evidence from the Indian market. Int. J. Indian Cult. Bus. Manag. 15(3): 350–377.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic