Discourses on Applied Ethics in a Service-Learning Partnership Project on Organic Agriculture

Frederick  F. Rodrigo,

Discourses on Applied Ethics in a Service-Learning Partnership Project on Organic Agriculture

Abstract:

This qualitative case study explored the constructs of applied ethics in a service learning partnership (SLP) project via social marketing and mobilization on organic agriculture. Applied ethics was unpacked based on the lived experiences of 21 project partners like concerned undergraduate and graduate students, faculty, and technology experts of the Mariano Marcos State University; administrators and staff of the Ilocos Agriculture and Resources Research and Development Consortium; clientele like the youth and farmers from Barangay Magnuang, City of Batac, Ilocos Norte; as well as subject matter specialists from the City and Provincial Agriculture Offices. A relatively large portion of the barangay has been contaminated with nitrate due to the farmers’ excessive use of inorganic commercial fertilizers. Based on the transcripts of the documented activities, 34 ethical issues evolved, which served as bases for the in-depth interview guide. The interviews were documented and themes were drawn out from the transcripts. Among the more commonly-encountered dilemmas were conflicts involving one group of partners and others. The limited time for doing the project was the most commonly-mentioned dilemma. Most of the ethical dilemmas were resolved through value- and purposive-rational actions, either strategic or communicative. Additionally, peer/collegial support and various groups’ cooperation facilitated dilemma resolution. Meanwhile, time and resource constraints, personal limitations and biases, and power relations were among the impediments in resolving ethical dilemmas. The implications of the project partners’ lived experiences in applied ethics were bases in recommending actions toward partnerships needed in sustainable organic agriculture.

References:

Biesta, G. (1995). Education/Communication: The Two Faces of Communicative Pedagogy. The Netherlands: Utrecht University. Retrieved from http://www.ed.uic.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/95_docs/biesta.html . 23 January 2005.
Burke, C. (1997). Leading schools through the ethics in the new era of education reform. Hawthorne: Australian Council for Educational Administration.
Burbules, N. (1993). Dialogue in teaching. New York/London: Teachers College Press. p.17.
___________ and Berk, R. (1999). Critical thinking and critical pedagogy: Relations, differences, and limits. In Pokewitz, T. S. and Fendler, L. (eds). Critical theories in education. Routledge: NewYork, pp. 45-65.
Caldwell, K. et al. (2000). Applied Ethics for Preparing Interprofessional Practitioners in Community Settings. Ethics and Behavior, 10 (3:257-269).
Cranston, N., Ehrich, L., and Kimber, M.. (2004). ‘Right’ versus ‘wrong’ and ‘right’ versus ‘right’: Understanding ethical dilemmas faced by educational leaders. Paper prepared for the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Nov 28-Dec 2, 2004, Melbourne, Australia.
Deetz, S. A. (1997). Communication in the Age of Negotiation. Journal of Communication, 47 (4:118-135).
Domsch, A. (2001). Values and ethics. Kansas: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Service.
Franz, N. (2003). Transformative learning in extension staff partnerships: Facilitating personal, joint, and organizational change. Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/2003april/al.shtml . 11 August 2006.
Freakley, M. and Burgh, G. (2000). Engaging with ethics: Ethical inquiry for teachers. Australia: Social Science Press.
Freire, P. (1992). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Press. p.14.
_______. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum. 186pp.
_______ and Macedo, D. P., (1996). A Dialogue: Cultured, Language and Race. In P. Leistyna, A. Woodrm and S. Sherblom (eds). Breaking free: The transformative power of critical pedagogy. pp. 201-28.
Freakley, M. & Burgh, G.. 2000. Engaging with ethics: Ethical inquiry for teachers. Australia: Social Science Press.
Gilbert, M. and Masucci, M. (2002). Examining Gender through Critical Pedagogy. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 26 (19-31).
Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. Bergin and Garvey: South Hadley.
Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification. In Habermas (ed). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press. pp.43-45.
_____________. (1999). On the pragmatics of communication. M. Cooke (ed). Massachusetts: Polity Press.
Hamelink, C. (2002). The Core Issue of Moral Choice in Media Ethics in Asia: Addressing the Dilemma. In Venkat Iyer (ed). Media ethics. Singapore: Stanford Press Pte Ltd.
Haynes, F. (1998). The ethical school. London: Routledge. Jocano, F. L. (1990). Management by culture. Quezon City: Punlad Research House. pp. 36-37.
Kidder, R. M. (1995). How people make tough choices: Resolving the dilemmas of ethical living. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Kotler, P. and Roberto, .E. L. (1989). Social marketing—Strategies for changing public behavior. New York, USA: The Free Press; London, UK: Collier MacMIllan Publishers. 401pp.
Ling, J. (1991). A globalized program for training and research in social mobilization for health. New Orleans, USA: International Communication Enhancement Center, Tulane University.
Masucci, M. and Renner, A. (2001). The evolution of critical service learning for education: Four problematics. Personal, ERIC - ED456962. pp. 1-20.
Navarro, R. L. (1997). Communication, Social Mobilization, and Social Marketing. Unpublished compilation of readings and transparencies for DEVC208. Laguna: Institute (now College) of Development Communication.
Prilleltensky, I. (1996). Values, assumptions, and practices: Assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist. 47, 517-535.
Preston, N. and Samford, C.. (2002). Encouraging ethics and challenging corruption. Sydney: Federation press.
Putnam, L. L. (2001). Shifting Voices, Oppositional Discourses, and New Visions for Communication Studies. Journal of Communication, 51 (1:38-51).
Reinard, J. (2001). Introduction to communication research. 3rd ed. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Book Co. p.176.
Richards, L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. Londo: SAGE Publications.
Richardson, D. (1999). Training Community Animators as Participatory Communication for Development Practitioners. SD Dimensions. Canada: UNPD-FAO. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/SUSTDEV/Cddirec.htm. 18 April 2005.
Sprague, J. (1992). Expanding the Research Agenda for Instructional Communication: Raising Some Unasked Questions. Communication Education, 33 (277-391).
Velasco, M. T. H., Cadiz, C. H. C. and Lumanta, M. F. (2003). DEVC208 Learning Module: Communication and social marketing. Laguna: UP Open University. 238pp.
Walker, K. (2001). Values and Ethics. Kansas: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Retrieved from http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/LEADS/FACT.htm