Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 5 no. 2 (2024)

Inducing the Growth and Yield of Mungbeans Applied with Different Level of Concentrations of Bio-Stimulant Solutions

Paulino A. Oñal, Jr. | Jessel Jane G Baldonebro | Manuel D Cortez

Discipline: agricultural sciences

 

Abstract:

The study sought to determine the effects of different levels of concentrations of bio-stimulant solution (BSS) in inducing the growth, flower, and yield of mung bean. The study was conducted at UNO-R School of Agriculture, Philippines last February to April 2022. Pagasa 3 variety was used as planting material. The study was laid out in RCBD) with four treatments and replicated 4 times. The BSS was diluted in water and applied 6 inches from the base of the plant as per research protocol. Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences among treatments in growth parameters such as plant height and leaf area index (LAI) at 35DAS. Likewise, there was high significant difference among treatments on the days to 50% flowering of the plant. Furthermore, results showed highly significant differences among treatments in the number of pods per plant, pod weight per plant, number of seeds per pod, 100 seed weight, and yield of mung bean. For the highest plant height, LAI, and period of flowering they were obtained from plants applied with 150ml BSS, followed by 100ml BSS, and 50ml BSS. On the other hand, untreated plants have the shortest height, narrower leaves, and late in flower initiation. Mung bean pods per plant were great in number, heavier in weight from plants treated with 150ml BSS among the other treatments, the most number of seeds per pod, and the heaviest per 100-seed weight as well as the highest seed yield per hectare. This study recommends the use of 150ml BSS in inducing the growth and higher yield of mung bean plant production.



References:

  1. Department of Agriculture (2019) The mung bean plant description. (li-brary.buplant.da.gov.ph)
  2. Department of Agriculture (2022). Mungbean production guide. Diliman, Quezon City. pp. 8.
  3. Dhillon, A. (2021). Effect of temperature on the mung bean growth rate. The Expedi-tion. Vol. 10. ( ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.ph/expedition/article/view/197721 ).
  4. Di-Filippo-Herrera, D. A., Muñpz, M., Hernan-dez-Herrera, R. M. & Carmona, G. H. (2019). The bio-stimulant activity of indi-vidual and blended seaweed extracts on the germination and growth of mung bean. Journal of Applied Phycology 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-018-1620-2.
  5. Emanceau, P.L. (2003). Review article Methods for studying root colonization by introduced, Agronomie. Vol 23, 407-418. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro.
  6. Fakir, M.S.A., Mondal, M.M.A., Ismal, M.R., & Ashnafuzzaman, M. (2011). Flowering pattern and reproductive efficiency of mungbean. International Journal of Agri-culture and Biology, 12 (6), 967-970. www.researchgate.net
  7. Higa, T. & Wididana, G.N. (1988). The concept and theories of effective microorganisms. University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Ja-pan. pp. 1-6.
  8. Koneni, S. (2016). Leaf area index and biomass duration in mung beans as influenced by phosphorous management. Trends in Bi-osciences, (9) 1., 34-36. www.researchgate.net
  9. Mahmood, N., Hafiz, I.A., Abbasi, N., and Ali, T. (2017). Effects of bio-stimulants on growth, yield, and bell pepper quality CV Yolo Wonder. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., Vol 54 (2). DOI: 10.21162/PAKJAS 17.5653., 311-317. www.researchgate.net.
  10. Majkoweka-Gadomska, J., Bobrowolkski, A.,Jadwisienczak, K.K., Kaliniewicz, Z., & Francke, A. (2021). Effect of bio-stimulants on Capsicum annum growth, yield, and nutritional value grown in an unheated plastic tunnel. Nature Portfo-lio, 1-4. https://doi.org/10-1038/s41598-02101834-x
  11. Malabataan, C.J.M., Carandang, F.F., & Merca-do, M.F.O. (2023). Efficacy evaluation of irradiated carrageenan as a plant growth promoter in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Walp. and Bush Sitao (Vigna unguicu-lata (L.) Walp. ssp sesquipedalis (L.) Verdc. x
  12. V. unguiculata (L.) Walp. ssp unguiculata) production. International Journal of Agri-cultural Technology 2023 Vol. 19(4), 1669-1680. http://www.ijat-aatsea.com.
  13. Martin, R., Montgomery, S., Yous, S., & Rien. (2020). Mungbean production guide. Aus-tralian Centre for International Agricul-tural Research (ACIAR), 1-64.
  14. Mondal, M. M. A., Puteh, A. B., Malek, M. A., Ismail, M. Y., & Latif, M. A. (2012). Seed yield of mung beans (Vigna radiata L.) to growth and development aspects. The Scientific World Journal. (Article TSWJ 245168). https://doi.org/2012/425168.
  15. Ncube, L., Mnkeni, P.N.S., & Brutsch, M.N. (2011). Agronomic suitability of effective microorganisms to tomato production. Vol 6 (3), 650-654. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR10.515.
  16. Oñal, P.A., Dabo, A.S., Cataluña, D.D., & Sa-lonoy, A.A. (2023). Effectiveness of bio-stimulant solutions in inducing the ger-mination of ginger rhizomes. 2023 Inter-national Conference on Agriculture Sci-ences, Environment, Urban and Rural Development
  17. (Morocco). https://www.conferenceseries.info/index.php/morocco.
  18. Paler, A. L. L. & Alcantara, C. G. (2021). Effect of Azolla (Azolla pinnata) as bio-stimulant on nutrient uptake and yield of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) Org. Agr. 11, 469-475 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-021-00353-3.
  19. Ramakrishnan, M.N., Boddepailli, V.N. & As-ghar, A. (2011). Seed production training manual. AVRDC South Asia. p. 1.
  20. Tadeves, T., Ayalew, T., & Yoseph, T., (2021). Effect of biological and chemical fertiliz-ers combination on yield of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. (Article IJPSS 76024). https://doi.org/10.9734/IJPSS/2021/76024.
  21. Yousfi, S., Marin., Parra, L., Lloret, J., & Mauri, P. V. (2021). A rhizogenic bi-stimulant ef-fect on soil fertility and root growth of turfgrass. Agronomy 2021; 11(3): 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030573

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic