HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 15 no. 2 (2023)

Receiving Teachers Teaching Efficacy and Performance in a Secondary School

Oswald Zabala III

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study was conducted primarily to determine if receiving teachers’ teaching efficacy rating were related to their teaching performance and how they perceived their performance in handling students with special needs. This study made use of a descriptive correlational explanatory research design where mixed model was employed combining qualitative and quantitative data. The study was participated by twenty-eight (28) receiving secondary teachers. Results showed that all receiving teachers perceived themselves to have high teaching efficacy. Moreover, the receiving teachers’ performance showed to be satisfactory in all teaching performance behavior. However, no relationship existed between receiving teachers’ teaching efficacy and their teaching performance. Receiving teachers were willing to accept and embrace inclusive education. It is recommended that receiving teachers sustain or improve their teaching efficacy and for them to attend trainings and seminars on inclusive education to better equip them in their role in special education. It is also recommended to replicate the study to a larger sample to authenticate the research findings.



References:

  1. Alnahdi, G. (2014). Special Education Teacher Transition-Related Competencies and Preparation in Saudi Arabia. International journal of special education, 29(2), 59-67.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  4. Bedir, G. (2015). Perception of Teaching Efficacy by Primary and Secondary School Teachers. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(1), 41-54.
  5. Byrd, D. R., & Alexander, M. (2020). Investigating special education teachers’ knowledge and skills: Preparing general teacher preparation for professional development. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(2), 72-82.
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
  7. Department of Education (2008), Policies and guidelines in special education in the Philippines, Special education division.
  8. Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N. How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill. New York.
  9. Gibson. J., & Dembo, M. (2004). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation.  Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582.
  10. Gabales, B., Jalotjot, E., & Zerrudo, A. (2011), “Developing a Classroom Observation Tool for SPED Teachers of Children with Special Needs”, Paper presented during the 2011 National Conference on Special Education, December 2011, Cebu City.
  11. Hobbs, V. (2007). Faking it or hating it: Can reflective practice be forced? Reflective Practice 8(3): 405-417.
  12. Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (2005). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 355-372.
  13. Kleinsasser, R. C. (2014). Teacher efficacy in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 168-179.
  14. Lipsky, Dorothy Kerzner, Inclusion and School Reform: Transforming American Classroom. P.H. Broops Publisher.
  15. Nguyet, Dinh Thi (2010), Preparing teachers for inclusive education. Catholic Relief Services.
  16. O'Connor, E. A., Yasik, A. E., & Horner, S. L. (2016). Teachers' Knowledge of Special Education Laws: What Do They Know?. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 13(1), 7-18.
  17. Saloviita, T. (2018). How common are inclusive educational practices among Finnish teachers?. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(5), 560-575.
  18. Tangen, D. J. (2007). A contextual measure of teacher efficacy for teaching primary school students who have ESL (Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology).Tschannen-Moran, M. Woolfolk, A. & Hoy, W. (2005) Review of Educational Research, Summer 1998; vol. 68, 2: pp. 202-248
  19. U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and ongoing professional development of teachers. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  20. Wheatley, K. F. (2005). The case for reconceptualizing teacher efficacy research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 747–766.
  21. Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Davis, H. (2005). Teachers' sense of efficacy and adolescent achievement. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Adolescence and education: Vol. 5: Self-efficacy beliefs during adolescence (pp. 117–137). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  22. Woolfolk, A. E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Teacher’s sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 137-148.