Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 15 no. 2 (2023)

Stakeholders’ Satisfaction on School Climate

Joven Mogol

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study focuses on the level of satisfaction of stakeholders on the five basic areas related to school climate such as pupil services and activities, teacher performance and behavior, physical environment, materials and equipment and miscellaneous (general impact.) The main instrument used in this study was a survey questionnaire. The data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation and ANOVA.The significant findings revealed that stakeholders are extremely satisfied with teachers’ performance and behavior, physical environment and miscellaneous (general impact) and highly satisfied with student services and activities and materials and equipment. There is no significant difference in all areas based on sex.



References:

  1. Amos, P. (2015). A Comparative Study of Factors Influencing Male and Female Lecturer’s Job Satisfaction in Ghanaian Higher Education.Journal of Education and Practice. 6(4).1-11
  2. Balmeo, M, et.al (2014). Exploring Major Predictors of Student Satisfaction: An Input Towards A Learning Friendly School Environment. The IAFOR Journal of Education.2 (1).173-196
  3. Barrows, Peterson & West. (20160. What Do Parents Think of Their Children’s Schools? The Journal. 17(2)
  4. Boafi, R.(2020). School Physical Environment and Student Academic Performance.Advance in Physical Education. 10(2).121-137
  5. Botez, P. (2015). Quality Based Education and Stakeholders Expectations-Romania. Economy Trandisciplinary Cognition. 16(1).72-78
  6. Better Education Care-HMI 2634 (2005).Parent Satisfaction with Schools.1-16
  7. Bucahan, J. (2015). How Our School Can Become Child-Friendly. The Modern Teacher. 64(1). 11-12
  8. Dayton Public School. (2017). What is Positive School Climate.www,dps.k12.oh.us>student –information.student.code-of-conduct
  9. Department of Education , Teacher Education Council and Commision on Higher Education (2009). Experential Learning Courses Handbook
  10. DepEd Order 44, s.2015. Guidelines on the Enhanced School Improvement Planning (ESIP) Process and School Reprt Card (SRC)
  11. DFAT Australian Government (2018). The Role of Key Stakeholder in Education and Effectiveness Principle, Foundation Level 1-28
  12. Ciobanua, A. (2013). The Role of Student Services in the Improving of Student Experiences in Higher Education. Social and Behavioral sciences.92.169-173
  13. Coelho, C  & Dell Agilo D.(2019). School Climate and School Satisfaction Among High School Adoslescent. Psychology and Education .21 (1). 265-281
  14. Darrrel, A. (2020). Stakeholders Consultation for Secondary Educational Goals Achievement in Public Schools in Riverstate. Global Scientific Journal. 8(2).3408-29
  15. De Franza A.  (2019). The Impact of Innovation in Education https://www.northeastern.educ
  16. Encinas, A, et.al (2020).Principles, Values and Beliefs of Student Affairs and Services.University of World News
  17. Fernandez, et.al (2011). Psychological Well being in Portugues adolescent. Revisita Lusofona de Educacao (18).155-172
  18. Fonseca, L, et.al (2016). Stakeholder’s Satisfaction and Sustainable Success. International Journal of Industrial and System Engineering. 24(2).144-157
  19. Gregory, A, Cornell, D. & Fan, X. (2011). The School Climate Theory. American Educational Research Journal
  20. Khaleel, M. (2017). Female Students Are More Likely To Get Higher Grades Than Male Students. International Journal of Science and Research Education. 7(3).378-386
  21. Kurredge, B. (2017).The Importance of Understanding Parental Satisfaction. https://empowers.org
  22. Maxwell.Reynolds, Lee, Subasic & Bromhead. (2017). The Impact of School Climate and School Identification on Acadenic Achievement: MultilevelModeling with Students and Teachers, Psychology.https://doi.otg..
  23. Mccladdie, H. (2017).A Case Study Focused on the Level of Satisfaction of Select Stakeholders: Parents, Teachers and Community Members on Identified Variables to Improve Academic Performance. Atlanta university.Doctor of Education.1-131
  24. McGrath E and Repetti R. (2020). Mother and Father’s Attitude Towards Their Children’s Academic Performance and Children’s Perception of Academic Competence. Journal of Youth and Adolescent. 29(6).712-713
  25. Mogol, J. (2021).Practices of the Key Players in the Initial Implementation of Modular Distant Learning Print. Marinduque State College.
  26. Mogol, J. (2020). Stakeholders Satisfaction on School Climate: Basis for Continuous Improvement. Tanza Elementary School. Basic Research.1-49
  27. Morse, L 92016). Relationship of Stakeholder Perception of School Climate. University of Findlay. Doctor of Education. 1-124
  28. Mossi, P. et.al (2019). QUASUS: A Tool for Measuring the Parents’School Satisfaction. Department of History, Society and Human Studies. University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
  29. Napitupulu, I. (2018). Analysis of Students’ Satisfaction Toward Quality of Service Facility. Journal of Physics. Conference Series 954. 1-8
  30. Nizhebetskly, D. (2019). How to Manage Stakeholders Engagement in a Strategic Way: Comprehensive Guide to Staheholders’ Management
  31. Pendon, G.(20160.Student Degree of Satisfaction of Student Services. Education and Multi disciplinary Study. 3(3).283-297
  32. Phillips, M. (2014). A Place for Learning: The Physical Environment of Classrooms
  33. Rajabelee, Y and Santally, M. (2020).Learner Satisfaction, Engagement and Performance on Online Module: Implication for Institutional e-Learning Policy.Education and Information Technology.(26),2523-56
  34. Roundy, L. (2016).What is Stakeholders in Education. https://study.com
  35. Rudazil, K. Et.al (2018). System View of School Climate: A Theoretical Framework of Research. Educational Psychological Review. 30.35-60
  36. Saleh, M, et.al (2019). Predictors of School Satisfaction Among Adolescents in Jordan. Journal of Muliti disciplinary Healthcare, 12. 621-631
  37. Sapri, M. (2009). Factors that Influence Student’s Level of Satisfaction with Regards to Higher Educational Facilities Services, 4 (1).34-50
  38. Sergi. T. (1999). Developing Quality Programs for Pupil Services: A Self Evaluative Guide. Commissioner of Education.Connecticut State Department of Education.1-173
  39. Shurair & Pokharel (2019). Stakeholders’ Perception of Service Quality: A Case in Qatar. Quality Assurance in Education. 27(4).ISSN 0968-4883
  40. Simon, B. (2018).What is Stakeholder’s Theory and How Dies It Impact an Organization. https://www.smartsheet.com
  41. Stavely, Z. (2015).The Power of Homevisits to Connect Teachers with Kids and their Families
  42. Toropova, A. and Johansson, MS. Teacher Job Satisfaction:The Impoertance of School Working Conditions and Teacher Characteristics. Education Review. 73(1).71-97
  43. Utulo, C. (2020). The Significance of Innovation in the New Normal Education. https://www.pressreader.com
  44. Warsi, S. (2018). How Important are Stakeholders in Educational System
  45. Warsi, S. (2018). What is the Importance of Stakeholders in Educational System. Franchise India Staff Contributing to School Welfare and Success
  46. Zhai, X. (2020).Interactive Learning Environment.28(5). 586-601
  47. Innovation that Have Reimagined Education During the pandemic. (2020). Ballway Children. Fighting for Street Children. https://railwaychildren.org
  48. Innovation:, types of innovation and business examples. (2020). https://youmatters.world
  49. Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST Resource Package-Module 12)
  50. Students’ Degree of Satisfaction of Student Services. (2016). IRA International Journal of Education and Multi disciplinary Studies.3 (3)

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic