HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 15 no. 3 (2023)

Sustainability Assessment of the Kalipunan Ng Liping Pilipina (KALIPI) Program Implementation in Iligan City And Cagayan De Oro City

Dairylle Clarido

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study assesses the sustainability of the KALIPI program in Iligan and Cagayan de Oro cities, employing a triangulation method encompassing both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Key informants, including leaders, members, and focal persons, were interviewed using a structured schedule, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic approaches. Findings reveal that respondents, predominantly aged 40-49 with an average of four children and an average household size of five, are primarily plain housewives reliant on their husbands' income, typically below P10,000 per month. While below the economic threshold, they are not 4Ps members but are on the waitlist. The KALIPI program is viewed as vital for social empowerment and economic enhancement, focusing mainly on social and economic pillars, with environmental activities being less prioritized. Respondents were initially drawn to KALIPI for its livelihood projects and profit-sharing opportunities. Over time, they recognized KALIPI's broader role in their development as women, finding solace and expression in their meetings. The study underscores the need for greater emphasis on environmental aspects within KALIPI programs to achieve sustainability. Effective organizational leadership, regular meetings, suitable venues, funding strategies, and member consultations are crucial for sustained membership and an active organization. Respondents propose additional programs and activities and suggest ways to enhance program success. In terms of program monitoring and evaluation, regular visits by the KALIPI focal person during monthly meetings were emphasized, highlighting the necessity for consistent monitoring and evaluation to prevent organizational inactivity. The theory of change and robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms are deemed essential for informed decision-making and tracking organizational transformations. Furthermore, this study identified gaps in the recruitment of new members, the frequency of focal person visits, and the lack of consistent focal person appointments, urging the need for clear guidelines and permanent designations to ensure effective program management and sustainability.



References:

  1. Borowy, I. (2013). Defining sustainable development for our common future: A history of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission). Routledge.
  2. El Wali, M., Golroudbary, S. R., & Kraslawski, A. (2021). Circular economy for phosphorus supply chain and its impact on social sustainable development goals. Science of The Total Environment, 777, 146060.
  3. Johns, M. L. (2013). Breaking the glass ceiling: Structural, cultural, and organizational barriers preventing women from achieving senior and executive positions. Perspectives in Health Information Management/AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association, 10(Winter).
  4. Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J. (2010). What is sustainability?. Sustainability, 2(11), 3436-3448.
  5. Möllenkamp, M., Pongiglione, B., Rabbe, S., Torbica, A., & Schreyögg, J. (2022). Spillover effects and other determinants of medical device uptake in the presence of a medical guideline: An analysis of drugā€eluting stents in Germany and Italy. Health Economics, 31, 157-178.
  6. Morrison, A. M., & Von Glinow, M. A. (1990). Women and minorities in management (Vol. 45, No. 2, p. 200). American Psychological Association.
  7. Summerfield, J., & Regan, L. (2021). How can we achieve sustainable development goal-5: Gender equality for all by 2030?. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 64(3), 415-421.UNFPA - United Nations Population Fund . 2021.