Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 15 no. 5 (2023)

BARRIERS OF FACULTY ON RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY

Lemuel Sayao | Bernadette Jeana Marie Aves | Anna Liza Cerbo | Maria Elena C. Morales | Jingle Navarez | Harry Dave B. Villasor

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Research productivity in Philippine Higher Education Institutions is a pressing challenge. Despite its recognized importance for instructional innovations and institutional development, many faculty members avoid research, even when incentives are available. This phenomenological study focused on tenured faculty at a private sectarian HEI in Southern Mindanao who hadn't produced research in the past five academic years. It explored the barriers they encountered and their suggestions for research support. The major obstacles identified by faculty were graduate studies and work responsibilities. Additionally, their lack of technical research writing knowledge contributed to their research limitations. Faculty members emphasized the need for ongoing research guidance, mentorship, and a wider range of incentives, such as integrating research into teaching loads, salary increases, even travel opportunities. Communication gaps between faculty and institutional research policies were evident as some faculty are not aware that the support they suggest are already provided. This study's implications stress the need for institutions to reconsider faculty workloads, offer additional training, and establish support systems that create a more research-friendly environment. Addressing these barriers and expanding incentives can inspire faculty to participate in research activities, fostering a vibrant research culture and advancing knowledge within the academic community.



References:

  1. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2003). The reluctant respondent. Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns, 153-173.
  2. Aguilar-de Borja, J. M. (2018). Teacher action research: Its difficulties and implications. Human. Soc.Sci. Rev, 6(1), 2935.
  3. Afonja, D., & Ojeomogha, O. (2014, July). Research Productivity and Academic Leadership among Faculty Members in Nigerian Universities. In Journal of the World Universities Forum (Vol. 7, No. 2).
  4. Alrahlah, A. A. (2016). The impact of motivational factors on research productivity of dental faculty members: A qualitative study. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 11(5),448 455
  5. Atieno, A. V., Onyancha, O. B., & Kwanya, T. (2022). Trends, patterns, and determinants of research productivity at the Technical University of Kenya. Information Development, 38(1), 97-113.
  6. Arsyad, S., Purwo, B. K., Sukamto, K. E., & Adnan, Z. (2019). Factors hindering Indonesian lecturers from publishing articles in reputable international journals. Journal on English as ForeignLanguage, 9(1), 42-70.
  7. Ary, Donald; Jacobs, Lucy Cheser; Sorensen, Chris; & Razavieh, Asghar. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education (8th ed.). Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
  8. Baloch, N., Siming, L., Abraha, A., & Hong, S. (2021). Faculty research productivity: differences between foreign and local doctoral degree holders in Pakistan. Higher Education, 82(1), 203-225.
  9. Batool, A., Ahmad, S., & Naz, S. (2021). Correlation of personal and institutional factors with research productivity among university teachers. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 9(2), 240-246.
  10. Bay Jr, B. E., & Clerigo, M. E. C. (2013). Factors Associated with Research Productivity among OralHealthcare Educators in an Asian University. International Education Studies, 6(8), 124-135.
  11. Baxter, J., & Eyles, J. (1997). Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: Establishing ‘rigour’in interview analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(4), 505-525.
  12. Bhandari, P. (2022). Ethical considerations in research: Types and examples. https://www.scribbr.com/
  13. Brown, N. (2019). Issues in academic educational research: The impact of current issues on researchactivity. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/
  14. Bueno, David Cababaro. (2019). Research and Publish or Hibernate? Analysis of the Limiting Factorstowards Scientific Productivity among Professorial Lecturers in the Philippines. 14. 1-13.10.13140/RG.2.2.30304.84482.
  15. Bullo, M. M., Labastida, R. T., & Manlapas, C. C. (2021). Challenges and difficulties encountered byteachers in the conduct of educational research: Basis for teachers’ enhancementprogram. International Journal of Research, 10(13), 67-75.
  16. Cardona, R. S. (2020). The enablers and outcomes of research productivity among junior high schoolmathematics teachers: A structural model. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science andTechnology Education, 16(11), em1901
  17. Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as itounds?. Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 10(6), 807-815.CHED Memorandum Orders No. 52 Series of 2016 (CMO 52 s. 2016)
  18. Chen Musgrove, M. M., Petrie, K., Cooley, A., & Schussler, E. E. (2021). Finding a Balance:Characterizing Teaching and Research Anxieties in Biology Graduate Teaching Assistants(GTAs). bioRxiv, 2021-09.
  19. Chen, Y., Nixon, M. R., Gupta, A., & Hoshower, L. (2010). Research productivity of accountingfaculty: an exploratory study. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 3(2), 101-115.
  20. Choi, A.M.K., Moon, J.E., Steinecke, A., Prescott, J.E. (2019). Developing a culture of mentorship tostrengthen academic medical centers. Academic Medicine; 94 (5): 630–633 https://doi.org/10.1097%2FACM.0000000000002498
  21. Cocal, C. J., Cocal, E. J., & Celino, B. (2017). Factors limiting research productivity of faculty members of a state university: The Pangasinan state university Alaminos city campus case. Asia Pacific Journal of Academic Research in Social Sciences, 2(43-48).
  22. Colaizzi, P. (1978). Psychological research as a phenomenologist views it. In: Valle, R. S. & King, M.(1978). Existential Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. Open University Press: NewYork.
  23. Cor Jesu College Manual (2017). Cor Jesu CollegeCreswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research designs: Choosing among five designs.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing
  24. Crossman, A. (2020). Understanding purposive sampling: An overview of the method and its applications. https://www.thoughtco.com/purposive-sampling-3026727
  25. Davison, R., Martinsons, M. G., & Kock, N. (2004). Principles of canonical action research. Informationsystems journal, 14(1), 65-86.
  26. Delong, R. (2021). The importance of research for modern education. https://www.theunionjournal.com/Etcuban, J., Andrin, G., Ninal, M., Campanilla, B., Dinauanao, A., Macugay, P. J., & Belarmino, G.(2016). Research productivity among faculty members of the University of Cebu, Philippines. JPAIR Institutional Research, 8(1), 20-40.
  27. Fawzi, H., & Al-Hattami, A. (2017). Faculty production of research papers: Challenges and recommendations. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(2), 221-228.
  28. Funder, D.C., Levine, J.M., Maackie, D.M., Morf, C.C., Sansone, C., Vazire, S., & West, S.G. (2014).Improving the dependability of research in personality and sociala psychology:Recommendations for research and educational practice. Personality and Social PsychologyReview, 18 (1), 3-12.
  29. Goodall, A. H., McDowell, J. M., & Singell, L. D. (2014). Leadership and the research productivity ofuniversity departments. Available at SSRN 2385160.
  30. Graneheim, U.H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: conceptsprocedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education today, 24 (2), 105-112
  31. Grant, J. (2021). Academic incentives and research impact: Developing reward and recognition systemto better people’s lives. Retrieved July 12, 2022 from https://academyhealth.org/sites/default/files/publication/%5Bfield_date%3Acustom%
  32. Gomez, M.A. & Catan, M.M. (2021). Factors leading to limited researches conducted by Philippinepublic school teachers. Innovare Journal of Education, 9(3)
  33. Guido, R. M. D., & Orleans, A. V. (2020). Philippine research productivity in education research: Acomparative performance in Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of MultidisciplinaryResearch, 8(4), 76-90.
  34. Guraya, S. Y., Khoshhal, K. I., Yusoff, M. S. B., & Khan, M. A. (2018). Why research productivity ofmedical faculty declines after attaining professor rank? A multi-center study from Saudi Arabia,Malaysia and Pakistan. Medical Teacher, 40(sup1), S83-S89.
  35. Gutierrez, G. (2021). Incentive theory of motivation and how it works. https://www.mysevensouls.com/Hagan, J. L. & Ballard, R. (2019). Barriers to research among faculty at a health sciencesuniversity. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 44-48.
  36. Heng, K., & Sol, K. (2021). Academic research in Cambodia: Progress, challenges, and waysforward. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 6-23.
  37. Henry, C., Ghandi, N., Hamid, U., & Bakar, A. (2020). Factors contributing towards researchproductivity in higher education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education(IJERE). 9.203.10.11591/ijere.v9il.20420
  38. Hoffmann, K., Berg, S. & Koufogiannakis, D. (2014). Examining success: Identifying factors thatcontribute to research productivity across librarianship and other disciplines. Program electroniclibrary and information systems. 38. 13-28. 10.29173/lirg639.
  39. Horodnic, I. A., & Zaiţ, A. (2015). Motivation and research productivity in a university systemundergoing transition. Research evaluation, 24(3), 282-292.
  40. Incentive Research Foundation (2019). The IRF 2019 trends study. https://theirf.org
  41. Incentive Theory of Motivation. Definition & Examples. (2022, October 5). https://study.com/academy/lesson/incentive-theory-motivation-psychology-approaches-uses-examples.html.
  42. Jameel, A. S., & Ahmad, A. R. (2020). Factors impacting research productivity of academic staff at theIraqi higher education system. International Business Education Journal, 13(1), 108-126.
  43. Kaiser, K. (2009). Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qualitativehealth research. 19 (11), 1632-1641.
  44. Kendra, C. (2021). What motivation theory can tell us about human behavior. https://www.verywellmind.com/
  45. Khalil, O. E., & Khalil, N. (2019). Business research productivity and barriers. International Journal ofProductivity and Quality Management, 26(1), 34-57.
  46. Kornhaber, R. et al.: The benefits and challenges of academic writing retreats: an integrativeeview. High Educ Res Dev. 2016;35(6):1210–1227. 10.1080/07294360.2016.1144572
  47. Israel, M. (2004). Strictly confidential? Integrity and the disclosure of criminological and socio–legalresearch. British Journal of Criminology, 44(5), 715-740.
  48. Lamba, M. (2020). Research productivity of health care policy faculty: a cohort study of HarvardMedical School. Scientometrics, 124(1), 107-130.
  49. Lambrechts, A. A., Larasatie, P., Boutelier, S., Guta, H. A., Leonowicz-Bukała, I., & Prashad, S. (2021).Why research productivity among women in academia suffered during the early stages ofCOVID-19 crisis: A qualitative analysis.
  50. Latif, L. A., & Subramaniam, T. (2016). Research, publication and funding within the open university Malaysia: audit and action. ASEAN Journal of Open & Distance Learning (AJODL), 8(1), 24-34.
  51. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
  52. Linderholm, T., Martínez, A., & Kim, J. (2022).  The scholarship development program: A team-basedmentoring approach to support scholarship productivity for untenured faculty. The Journal ofFaculty Development; Madison Vol. 36, Iss. 1: 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-5999-0
  53. Mack, D. E., Gunnell, K. E., Wilson, P. M., & Adachi, J. D. (2011). Psychological needs as mediators?The relationship between leisure-time physical activity and well-being in people diagnosed withosteoporosis. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 82(4), 794-798.
  54. Mantikayan, J. M., & Abdulgani, M. A. (2018). Factors Affecting Faculty Research Productivity:Conclusions from a Critical Review of the Literature. JPAIR Multidisciplinary ResearchJournal, 31(1), 1-1.
  55. Mbaleka, S. W. (2015). Focusing Research Publication on Global Issues: Evidence from the Philippines.International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5(5), Pages 248-261. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v5-i5/1634
  56. Mirasol, J. M., & Inovejas, C. J. (2017). Building a Culture of Research in a Higher EducationInstitution. Journal of Higher Education Research Disciplines. 1, 12, Pages 72-82.
  57. Mizan, M. R. (2022). Educational research: Definition of educational research and its benefits andimportance. https://www.mizanurrmizan.info/
  58. Mimiaga, M. J., Reisner, S. L., Reilly, L., Soroudi, N., & Safren, S. A. (2009). Individualinterventions.In HIV prevention (pp. 203-239). Academic Press.
  59. Morse, J.M., Barrett, M., mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies forestablishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International journal of qualitativemethods, 1 (2), 13-22.
  60. Okendo, O. E. (2018). Constraints of research productivity in universities in Tanzania: A case ofMwenge Catholic University, Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(3),201-210.
  61. Okoduwa, S. I., Abe, J. O., Samuel, B. I., Chris, A. O., Oladimeji, R. A., Idowu, O. O., &
  62. Okoduwa, U. J. (2018). Attitudes, perceptions, and barriers to research and publishing amongresearch and teaching staff in a Nigerian Research Institute. Frontiers in Research Metrics andAnalytics, 3, 26.
  63. Park, K. E., Sibalis, A., & Jamieson, B. (2021). The mental health and well-being of master’s anddoctoral psychology students at an Urban Canadian University. International Journal ofDoctoral Studies, 16, 429.
  64. Peng, J. E., & Gao, X. (2019). Understanding TEFL academics’ research motivation and its relationswith research productivity. Sage Open, 9(3), 2158244019866295.
  65. Pfund, C., Winston, A.B., Branchaw, J., Hurtado, S. & Eagan, K. (2016). Defining attributes and metricsof effective research mentoring relationships. PubMed Central, 20 (2), 238-248, doi:10.1007/s10461-016-1384-z
  66. Penner, J. L., & McClement, S. E. (2008). Using phenomenology to examine the experiences of familycaregivers of patients with advanced head and neck cancer: Reflections of a noviceresearcher. International journal of qualitative methods, 7(2), 92-101
  67. Pornsalnuwat, P. (2014). Faculty Research Productivity at Assumption University Thailand (Doctoraldissertation, University of Minnesota).
  68. Prado, N. I. (2019). Predictors of research productivity among administrators, faculty, andstudents. Liceo Journal of Higher Education Research, 15(2).
  69. Quimbo, M. A. T., & Sulabo, E. C. (2014). Research productivity and its policy implications in highereducation institutions. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1955-1971.
  70. Quitoras, M. C. L. & Abuso, J. E. (2021). Best practices of higher education institutions (HEIs) for thedevelopment of research culture in the Philippines. Pedagogical Research, 6 (1), em0087. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/9355
  71. Rogayan, D. & Corpuz, L. (2022). Evaluating the research productivity of a state university in CentralLuzon, Philippines: Basis for policy recommendations. International Journal of Evaluatio andResearch in Education (IJERE). 10. 10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22099.
  72. Root Kustritz, M. V., & Nault, A. J. (2020). Measuring productivity and impact of veterinary Education-related research at the Institutional and individual Levels using the H-index. Journal of veterinary medical education, 47(4), 414-420.
  73. Sabharwal, M. (2013). Productivity and leadership patterns of female faculty members in public administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(1), 73-96.
  74. Salvador, R. (2016). Teaching Qualification as Predictor of Faculty Performance of Two StateUniversities in Mindanao, Philippines. Vol. 8 · October 2016 Print ISSN 2244-1824 · OnlineISSN 2244-1816 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7719/irj.v8i1.42
  75. Saskia, M., Brand, T., Jurgen, D. Gansefort, D. & Zeeb, H. (2021). How many key informants are enough? Analyzing the validity of the community readiness assessment. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
  76. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students. 6th edition, Pearson Education Limited.
  77. Shanmugam, S., Zakaria, N., Ismail, M., Bakit, P., & Diah, N. M. (2019). Perceived barriers and motivating factors influencing research productivity among nursing and allied health professionals trainers. The Malaysian Journal of Nursing (MJN), 11(2), 49-56.
  78. Shariatmadari, M. & S. Mahdi, 2012. Barriers to research productivity in Islami Azad University: Exploring faculty members perception. Indian J. Sci. Technol., 5:2765-2769.
  79. Shrestha, P. (2017). Incentive theory of motivation. https://www.psychestudy.com/general/motivation-emotion/incentive-theory-motivation.
  80. Singh, R & Gelat, K. (2022). Importance and necessity of education research. International Journal ofResearch Publication and Reviews, Vol 3, no 9, pp 894-901
  81. Speziale, H. J. S. & Carpenter, D. R. (2007). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  82. Suhardi, M., Fuad, N. & Rosyidi, U. (2019). Strategy in Improving Research Productivity of theLecturers. 10.2991/icetep-18.2019.30.
  83. Squiers, J.J., Lobdell, K.W., Fann, J.I. & DiMaio JM. (2017). Physician burnout: are we treating the symptoms instead of the disease? The Annals of Thoracic Surgery; 104 (4): 1117–1122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.009
  84. Suson, R., Capuno, R., Manalastas, R., Malabago, N., Aranas, A., & Ermac, E. (2020). Educational Research Productivity Road Map: Conclusions from the Identified Research Barriers and Variables. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 1160-1175.
  85. Szabo, V., & Strang, V.R. (1997). Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Advances in nursing science.20(2), 66-74.
  86. Tarrayo, V.N., Hernandez, P.J.S. & Claustro, J.M.A.S. (2021). Research engagement by Englishteachers in a Philippine University: Insights from a qualitative study. (2021). Asia Pacific SocialScience Review, 21(3), 74-85
  87. Tariq, M., & Ahmad, T. (2016). Is English language a barrier in research productivity amonginformation professionals? A descriptive study. Pakistan Journal of Information Managementand Libraries, 17, 162-173.
  88. Tausch, N., Kenworthy, J. B., & Hewstone, M. (2007). The confirmability and disconfirmability of traitconcepts revisited: Does content matter?. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(3),542.
  89. Teka, F., Habtamu, A., Najib, A. H., & Gemechu, F. (2017). Publication productivity of academics inJigjiga University, Ethiopia. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(9), 559-568.
  90. Tindowen, D. J., Guzman, J., & Macanang, D. (2019). Teachers’ conception and difficulties in doingaction research. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(8), 1787-1794.
  91. Toquero, C. M. D. (2020). “Real-world:” preservice teachers' research competence and researchdifficulties in action research. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(1), 126-148.
  92. Tudy, R. & Tudy, I. (2016). Doing Qualitative Research: A Guide for Students Researchers.
  93. Ula, M.B., (2018). Benefits and challenges of doing research: Experiences from Philippine public-school teachers. Issues in Educational Research, Vol.28 (3), 797-810.
  94. US National Science Foundation (2020). The state of U.S. science and engineering 2020.van LankveldT., et al.: Developing a teacher identity in the university context: a systematic review of theliterature. Higher Education Research and Development. 2017;36(2):325–342.10.1080/07294360.2016.1208154
  95. Vlăsceanu, L., & Hâncean, M. G. (2015). Policy incentives and research productivity in the Romanianhigher education. An institutional approach. In The European higher education area (pp. 185-203). Springer, Cham.
  96. Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2015). Factors leading to limited faculty publications in Philippine higher educationinstitutions.
  97. Warnock, D. M., & Appel, S. (2012). Learning the unwritten rules: Working class students in graduateschool. Innovative Higher Education, 37, 307-321
  98. Xu, X., Oancea, A. & Rose, H. (2021). The Impacts of Incentives for International Publications onResearch Cultures in Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences. Minerva 59, 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09441-w
  99. Zarah, L. (2022). 7 reasons why research is important. https://owlcation.com/.
  100. Zavale, N. C., & Schneijderberg, C. (2020). Mapping the field of research on African higher education:a review of 6483 publications from 1980 to 2019. Higher Education, 1-35.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic