HomeLAMDAGvol. 9 no. 1 (2018)

Utilization of the K to12 Assessment Tools in Secondary English Language Teaching

Myra Ambalong

 

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to investigate the extent of utilization of the Kto12 assessment tools in classroom practices and to design an assessment tool guide that is defined within the curriculum standards of Kto12 program. The study is anchored on Title’s theory which was developed to direct assessment run-through in classrooms. This theory emphasized the dimensions of classroom assessment practices. Title stressed that there are two important things to learn about assessment, knowledge related to teaching and knowledge about assessment process. The study employed the qualitative and quantitative approach. Researcher–made questionnaire, focus group discussion, and semi–structured interview were used in the investigation. Results showed that majority of the teachers are middle aged, who have been teaching English over 16 years. Their most used tool is the Short Answer with Interactive Activities while Portfolio is the most popular summative tool. Results furthermore show that teachers with more training sessions attended tend to utilize this assessment tool more extensively. Hence, the tool kit is designed for teachers as bases in assessing the needs of their students, to meet curriculum standards and to serve as further aid for the improvement of practice. It was concluded that teachers utilized the different assessment tools to promote quality learning. Through its utilization learners performed better in the classroom and teachers were able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of their learners. Also, formative tools bridged the gap in the community of diverse learners. It was then recommended that teachers should continue to practice the utilization of the assessment tools to the maximum level, adopt and align with the new trends in utilizing appropriate assessment tools to achieve the optimum learning of the learners.



References:

  1. Barberos, et.al (2010). Measurement and assessment in teaching. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
  2. Barsdale – Ladd and Thomas (2010). Metacognitive Processes: Teaching Strategies in Literacy Education Courses, 67-84. Retrieved on Nov 7, 2017 retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com     
  3. Black, P. & William, D (1998). Inside the blank box. Phi Delta Kappan, 8, 139-148.
  4. Department of Education.(2012). Guidelines on the assessment and rating of learning outcomes under the K to 12 basic education curriculum. Retrieved on November 7, 2017 from www.gov.ph/downloads/2012/D4Sept/20120905-DepEd-DO-0073-BSA.pdf November 7, 2017
  5. Department of Education (2015).Policy Guidelines on classroom Assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program.
  6. Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning. California: Thousand Oaks, Corwin Press.
  7. Go, M.B. & Position, O.T. (2010). Language and Literature Assessment: A Comprehensive Guide. Manila: Lorimar Publishing, INC.
  8. Hiller, Yvonne (2012). Reflective Teaching in Further and language Education. Retrieved on November 7, 2017 retrieved from https://www.amazon.co.uk/reflective-teaching-further-adult-education/dp/082647965  
  9. Kain, et.al. (1998) Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
  10. Kleinert, Kennedy, Kearns (1999). The impact of alternate assessments. A statewide teacher survey. A journal of special education, 33, 93-102.
  11. Lucido, Nick (2010). Advertising Specializing in Public Relations Through Language Literacy. Retrieved on October 27, 2017 retrieved from https://wwww.language.com/in/nicklucido
  12. McMillan, J.M.,Myran, S., & Workman, D. (2008). Assessment Essentials for student based education (2nd Ed.). California: Thousand Oaks.Crown Press.
  13. Race, P. et al (2009).  500 Tips on Assessment: The 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.
  14. Title, C.K. (1994). Toward an educational psychology of assessment for teaching and learning theories, context and validation arguments. Educational Psychology 29, 149-162
  15. Vandeyar, D. (2005). Assessment and classroom learning. Educational Assessment: Principles, Policies and Practices, 5(1), 7-74. Also summarized in Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
  16. Zhang & Burry – Stock (2003).Classroom Assessment Practices and teachers’ self – perceived assessment skills.Applied measurement in Education, 161 323-342.