Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 5 no. 3 (2024)

Effectiveness of Independent Science Project Plan (ISPP) In Enhancing Scientific Inquiry Skills of Grade 7 Filipino Students

Larjay Hipolito Deliguin

Discipline: Developmental Studies

 

Abstract:

The Independent Science Project Plan (ISPP) was used to improve the science inquiry skills of 100 Science 7 students from 4 secondary public schools in Castillejos District, Division of Zambales, Philippines. A quasiexperimental research design was used, and it required a 50-item pretest and post-test that were validated, and pilot tested by the researcher. Mean analysis, correlated and independent samples tests, and rate of improvement (ROI) are the statistical tools utilized for analysis. Findings revealed there is a significant difference in the level of scientific inquiry skills of the participants before and after the implementation of the strategy. There is a significant difference in the MPS scores between the control and experimental group during the post-test involving all the scientific inquiry skills. When compared to the control group, the experimental group had a much better degree of proficiency in asking questions about the world, in designing and conducting the investigation, in employing different strategies to obtain information, and in communicating results, compared to the control group. Also, the teachers agreed in their being well-quipped with knowledge and skills in delivering distance learning classes through integrating technology into the curriculum, teacher’s preparation, and on the available facilities in conducting distance learning for science teaching. The end outcome is a clear indication that the method worked as intended.



References:

  1. Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantita-tive approaches (3rd ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
  2. Cetin, P. (2021). Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Laboratory Instruction on Developing Secondary Students’ Views on Scientific Inquiry. Journal of Chemical Educa-tion, 98(3), 756-762. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01364
  3. Chiang, I., Jhangiani, R., & Price, P. (2020). Quasi-Experimental Research. Retrieved 5 September 2020, from https://opentextbc.ca/researchmethods/chapter/quasi-experimental-re-search/#:~:text=Quasi%2Dexperimental%20research%20involves%20the,and%20interrupted%20time%2Dseries%20designs.
  4. Duran, M., & Dökme, İ. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student’s Critical Thinking Skills. EURA-SIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(12), 2887–2908. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a
  5. Feyzioğlu, B. (2019) The role of inquiry-based self-efficacy, achievement goal orienta-tion, and learning strategies on second-ary-school students’ inquiry skills, Research in Science & Technologi-cal Education, 37:3, 366-392, DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2019.1579187
  6. Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Arm-strong, N. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Jour-nal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030216
  7. Hairida, H. (2016). The effectiveness using in-quiry based natural science module with authentic assessment to improve the crit-ical thinking and inquiry skills of junior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 209-215.
  8. Ješková1, Z., Balogová1, B., & Kireš1, M. (2018, September 1). IOPscience. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Retrieved January 22, 2022, from https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1076/1/012022
  9. Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruc-tion Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Prob-lem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psycholo-gist, 41(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
  10. Klahr, D.; Nigam, M. (2004). The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science In-struction: Effects of Direct Instruction and Discovery Learning. Psychological Science, 15(10), 661–667. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00737.x
  11. Llego, M. (2020). DepEd Self-Learning Mod-ules (SLM) for School Year 2020-2021 - TeacherPH. Retrieved 6 September 2020, from https://www.teacherph.com/deped-learning-delivery-modalities
  12. Lord, T. & Orkwiszewski, T. (2006). Moving from didactic to inquiry-based instruction in a science laboratory. The American Bi-ology Teacher, 68, 342- 345. https://doi.org/10.2307/4452009
  13. Lubiano, M. L., & Magpantay, M. S. (2021). En-hanced 7E instructional model towards enriching science inquiry skills. Interna-tional Journal of Research in Education and Science, 630–658. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1963
  14. Nworgu, L. N., & Otum, V. V. (2013). Effect of guided inquiry with analogy instructional strategy on students acquisition of sci-ence process skills. Journal Education and Practice 4,(27) 35, 40.
  15. Omorogbe, E., & Ewansiha, C. J. (2013). The Challenge of Effective Science Teaching in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(7), 187–188. https://doi.org/Doi:10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n7p181
  16. Panjaitan, M. B., & Siagian, A. (2020). The Ef-fectiveness of Inquiry-Based Learning Model to Improve Science Process Skills and Scientific Creativity of Junior High School Students. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(4), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.74.380.386
  17. PISA 2018 National Report of the Philippines. (2019). Retrieved 29 August 2020, from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PISA-2018-Philippine-National-Report.pdf
  18. Reysio-Cruz, M. (2019). Worst PH ranking in math, science, reading prompts DepEd review. Retrieved 29 August 2020, from https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1198208/worst-ph-ranking-in-math-science-reading-prompts-deped-review
  19. Rubin, C. & Babbie, S. (2017). Research meth-ods for social work (9th edition). Boston, MA: Cengage.
  20. Sahintepe, S., Erkol, M., & Aydogdu, B. (2019, November 30). The impact of Inquiry-Based Learning Approach on secondary school students' science process skills. Open Journal for Educational Research. Retrieved January 22, 2022, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1285099
  21. ekin, G., & Eryılmaz Muştu, Ö. (2021). The effect of research-inquiry-based activities on the academic achievement, attitudes, and scientific process skills of students in the seventh year science course. The Eu-ropean Educational Researcher, 4(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.416
  22. Thomas, L. (2020, August 3). An introduction to quasi-experimental designs. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quasi-experimental-design/
  23. umusak, G. K. (2015, November 30). ERIC - EJ1109214 - Science Process Skills in Sci-ence Curricula Applied in Turkey, Journal of Education and Practice, 2016. Https://Eric.Ed.Gov/?Q=science+process+skills&id=EJ1109214

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic