Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 5 no. 3 (2024)

Electronic Math Problems Analyses and Mastery of Operations, Rules, and Expressions (E-Math Pa More) on the Performance of Grade 9 Students

Jenilyn E. Samaco | Aileen Cabanes | Joemar T. Minoza

Discipline: Mathematics

 

Abstract:

This study sought to assess the effectiveness of Electronic Math Problems Analyses and Mastery of Operations, Rules, and Expressions (e-MATH PA MORE) as digital learning material in the performance of Grade 9 students of Libagon National High School in Math for the School Year 2022- 2023. In order to collect data from the students, this study used a twogroup quasi-experimental design including pretest and posttest. The study involved the participation of seventy (70) Grade 9 pupils. One of the two sections, each with 35 pupils, acted as the control group, while the other was the experimental group. To determine the study's findings, the data were statistically treated using inferential statistics, specifically T-test (paired and independent), mean and standard deviation, frequency, and percentage. Based on the study's findings, it is possible to infer that both e-Math PA MORE and the traditional style of teaching are effective in teaching Mathematics. However, a greater improvement in Mathematics performance was noticed in the class when e-Math PA MORE was used, indicating that it is more successful than the old method. Hence, e-Math PA MORE offers learning experiences to aid in the formation of knowledge, particularly in mathematics. Furthermore, teachers should be properly equipped with the information and abilities necessary to create e-Math PA MORE. It is recommended that further studies should be conducted to continually improve the utilization of e-Math PA MORE, accentuating on teachers’ preparedness and attitude.



References:

  1. Abou El-Seoud, M. S., Taj-Eddin, I. A., Seddiek, N., El-Khouly, M. M., & Nosseir, A. (2014). E-Learning and Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 9(4), 20. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i4.3465
  2. Al-Todry, Awad Hussein (2009): "Educational Technology: Its Innovations and Applications", Faculty of Education, Assiut University.
  3. Almerino, P., Guinocor, M., Mamites, I., Lumayag, C., Villaganas, M. A., & Capuyan, M. (2020). Mathematics Performance of Students in a Philippine State University. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/7859
  4. Americans, W. A. (2009). It doesn’t add up African American students’ mathematics achievement. Secondary Lenses on Learning Participant Book: Team Leadership for Mathematics in Middle and High Schools, 149. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2IaUOrL
  5. Ahn, J. Y., & Edwin, A. (2018). An e-Learning Model for Teaching Mathematics on an Open Source Learning Platform. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3733
  6. Andamon, Jocelyn & Tan, Denis. (2018). Conceptual Understanding, Attitude And Performance In Mathematics Of Grade 7 Students. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research. 07(8), 96-105.
  7.  Anshari, M., Alas, Y., Hardaker, G., Jaidin, J., Smith, M., & Ahad, A. (2016). Smartphone habit and behavior in Brunei: Personalization, gender, and generation gap. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 719-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.063
  8. , S. K. (2015). Influence of Sex on Students’ Study Orientation at Secondary Level. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2(10). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.210.1355
  9. , S., & Delaney, S. (2014). Assessment of Teacher Knowledge Across Countries: A Review of the State of Research. International Perspectives on Teacher Knowledge, Beliefs and Opportunities to Learn, 541-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6437-8_25
  10. Braun V., Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  11. Care, E., Azim, F., Beswick, B., Harding, S. M., Luo, R., Bustos, T., & Cagasan, L. (2015). Large-scale assessments for use in the Philippines. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2G0PvYq
  12. Carreon, J. R. (2018). Facebook as integrated blended learning tool in technology and livelihood education exploratory. International Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 19-25
  13. Cho, Y., Avalos, J., Kawasoe, Y., Johnson, D., & Rodriguez, R. (2021). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Low Income Households in the Philippines. https://doi.org/10.1596/35260
  14. Dinglasan, B. L., & Patena, A. (2013). Students performance on departmental examination: Basis for math intervention program. University of Alberta School of Business Research Paper, (2013-1308). Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2uYhfrk
  15. Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital Technology in Mathematics Education: Why It Works (Or Doesn’t). Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_8
  16. Edmonger. (2021, July 28). EdMonger. Retrieved from Edmonger: https://edmonger.com/2021/07/28/roles-of-technology-in-education/Etcuban, J. O., & Pantinople, L. D. (2018). The Effects of Mobile Application in Teaching High School Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Educa-tion, 13(3), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3906
  17. Eyyam, R., & Yaratan, H. (2014). Impact of use of technology in mathematics lessons on student achievement and attitudes. Social Behavior and Personality: An internation-al journal, 42(0), S31-S42.
  18. Ganal, N. N., & Guiab, M. R. (2014). Problems and difficulties encountered by students towards mastering learning competen-cies in mathematics. Researchers World, 5(4), 25. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2X0dJc8
  19. Hernawati, K., & Jailani,. (2019). Mathematics mobile learning with TPACK framework. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(2), 022126. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022126
  20. Haury, D.L. and Rillero, P. “Perspectives of Hands-On Science Teaching”. www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/science/.../eric-1.html
  21. Islam, Md. K., Sarker, Md. F. H., & Islam, M. S. (2022). Promoting student-centred blended learning in higher education: A model. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(1), 36-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211027721
  22. Lawless, C. (n.d.). Learn Upon Blog. Retrieved from Learn Upon Website: https://www.learnupon.com/blog/what-is-elearning/
  23. Leatham, K. R., & Peterson, B. E. (2010). Secondary mathematics cooperating teachers’ perceptions of the purpose of student teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9125-0
  24. Saavedra, J. (2020). Educational Challenges and Opportunities of the Coronavirus (COVID- 19) Pandemic. World Bank Blogs.
  25. Salamat, L., Ahmad, G., Bakht, I., & Saifi, I. L. (2018). Effects of E–Learning on Students’ Academiclearning at university Level. Asian Innovative Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 1-12.
  26. Segumpan, Lester Lou & Segumpan, Benguar & Tan, Denis. (2018). MATHEMATICS PERFORMANCE AND ANXIETY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN A FLIPPED CLASSROOM. 10.5281/zenodo.1325918.
  27. Sharma, B. N., Fonolahi, A. V., Bali, A., & Narayan, S. S. (2018). The Online Mathematics Diagnostic Tool for Transformative Learning in the Pacific. Cases on Smart Learning Environments, 63-80. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6136-1.ch005
  28. Montanes, S. M. (2022). DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF GRADE 9 TLE-COOKERY APPLICATION USING RAPID INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN (RID) MODEL. Libagon.
  29. Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáce-res-Reche, P., & Alonso-García, S. (2020). E-Learning in the Teaching of Mathemat-ics: An Educational Experience in Adult High School. Mathematics, 8(5), 840. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050840.
  30. , A. H., & Musbah, K. T. (2013). Improvement Quality of LMS Through Application of Social Networking Sites. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 8(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v8i3.2669
  31. Pagtulon- an, E. & Tan, D. (2018). Students’ Mathematics Performance and Self- Efficacy Beliefs in aRich Assessment Tasks Environment. Asian Academic Research Journal of Multidisciplinary,5(2),54-64
  32. Powerschool. (2022, April 20). Retrieved from Powerschool Website: https://www.powerschool.com/blog/the-tpack-framework-explained-with-classroom-examples/#:~:text=TPACK%20is%20a%20technology%20integration,are%20very%20different%20in%20scope.
  33. Research Clue. (2017). the effects of e-learning on teaching and learning of mathematical concepts. Available at: https://nairaproject.com/projects/2669.html. [Accessed: 2023-9-7].
  34. Saad, L. (2005, May 15). Gallup. Retrieved from Gallup, Inc. Website: https://news.gallup.com/poll/16360/math-problematic-us-teens.aspx
  35. Sa’ad, T. U., Adamu, A., & M. Sadiq, A. (2014). The Causes of Poor Performance in Mathematics among Public Senior Secondary School Students in Azare Metropolis of Bauchi State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 4(6), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-04633240
  36. Saavedra, J. (2020). Educational Challenges and Opportunities of the Coronavirus (COVID- 19) Pandemic. World Bank Blogs.
  37. Salamat, L., Ahmad, G., Bakht, I., & Saifi, I. L. (2018). Effects of E–Learning on Students’ Academiclearning at university Level. Asian Innovative Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 1-12.
  38. -for-Improving-Student-Retention.pdf. (2014). https://www.hanoverresearch.com/media/Strategies-for-Improving-Student-Retention.pdf
  39. Segumpan, Lester Lou & Segumpan, Benguar & Tan, Denis. (2018). MATHEMATICS PER-FORMANCE AND ANXIETY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN A FLIPPED CLASSROOM. 10.5281/zenodo.1325918.
  40. Spiteri, M., & Chang Rundgren, S.-N. (2018). Literature Review on the Factors Affect-ing Primary Teachers’ Use of Digital Technology. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9376-x
  41. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Prob-lem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cogni-tive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  42. Tan, D & Cordova, C. (2018). Mathematics Pro-ficiency, Attitude, and Performance of Grade 9 Students in Private High Schools in Bukidnon, Philippines. Asian Academic Research Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 5(2), 103-116.
  43. Tobias, C. A., & Diego, C. V. (2022). Factors Predicting the Mathematics Performance of Grade 8 Students in the New Normal. Asian Research Journal of Mathematics, 287-300. https://doi.org/10.9734/arjom/2022/v18i11602
  44. , M., Gerogianns, V., & Fitsilis, P. (2010). Evaluation of Factors That De-termine Quality in Higher Education: An Empirical Study. Quality Assurance in Ed-ucation, 18, 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881011058669
  45. Ulep, Soledad A., (2006). Good Mathematics Teaching Practices - in the making: a Phil-ippine Experience. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/GOOD-MATHEMATICS-TEACHING-PRACTICES-IN-THE-MAK-ING%3AUlep/a10d530879f5f247251d61d37a4edf4bcc5eb425
  46. Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Garrido-Arroyo, M. del C., Burgos-Videla, C., & Morales-Cevallos, M. B. (2020). Trends in Educational
  47. Research about e-Learning: A Systematic Literature Review (2009–2018). Sustain-ability, 12(12), 5153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125153
  48. Vellaichamy,K.(2019). A study on barriers in teaching Learning process of mathemat-ics at Secondary standard level. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. 6(1). 352-356.
  49. Wei, M. H., & Dzeng, H. (2014). A comparison study of math education and math per-formance between Asian countries and the United States. Journal of Socialomics, 3(02), 2167-0358. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0358.1000111
  50. Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z.-H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T.-W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0100-9
  51. Zumbrunn, S., Tadlock, J., & Roberts, E. D. (2011). Encouraging Self-Regulated Learning in the Classroom: A Review of the Literature. Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium (MERC), Virginia Commonwealth University.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic