HomeInternational Social Science Reviewvol. 6 no. 1 (2022)

Tracer Study of BSBA Graduates: Basis for Curriculum Development

Ramelyn Natividad | Lida Rose Baylon

 

Abstract:

The study aimed to determine the Bachelor of Science Business Administration program graduates' employability and school acquired skills and competencies related to their occupation. A modified Graduate Tracer Study instrument was utilized and converted in to google form to gather the quantitative data. The said instrument was divided into three parts; the first part covers the general information, the name, address, birthday, contact number and email address, and educational attainment. The second part contains the training received from the program, such as values formation, skills enrichment seminars, and work practice. The last part contains the employment data including current jobs, status, type of institution employed with, and the specific nature of work. Out of 487 respondents, only 60 responses representing the sample population were analyzed using confidence level probability. The finding revealed that most of the graduates were single and female, hold the rank-and-file position, and occupy a regular or permanent employment status. The perceived skills and competencies such as communication skills, leadership, critical thinking, human relation, problemsolving skills, and entrepreneurial skills given by the BSBA program were considered relevant and applicable in the performance in their jobs. The study also determined that BSBA graduates were primarily employed in the private serviceproviding institution and that salaries and benefits were the reasons they accepted and stayed with their jobs.



References:

  1. Astillero, R. (2011). Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge. Happer and Row Publishers Inc.
  2. Bass, B. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership, Theory, Research, and Managerail Applications. The Free Press
  3. Fraenkel, J. & Wallen, N. (2015). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 8thEdition.
  4. Gardner, H. (1999). The Disciplined Mind: Beyond Facts and Standardized Tests, The K-12 Education That Every Child Deserves, Penguin Putnam
  5. House, R. J. (1971). ‘’A path Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness’’. Administrative Science Quarterly 16:321-339
  6. Olson, L. (2016). ‘’ETS Analysis Track Parent Dissatisfaction,’’ Education Week XIIX Pederson and Wilk (1993). Factors Influencing Employee Job Satisfaction: A Conceptual Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology
  7. Reroy, R. (2019). Leaders: School satisfaction: A statistical profile of cities and sub-urbs. Educational; Testing Service.
  8. Salisbury, D.F. Branson, R.K., Altreche, W.I., Funk, F.F., Broetzmann, S.M. (2017). Educational Policy, 11 (3), 286—308.
  9. Sayles, L. R. (1981). Leadership: What Effective Managers Really Do…and How They Do It. McGrawHill, Inc.
  10. Scheuing, E.E & Christopher, W.F (2016). The service quality handbook. American Management Association
  11. Spring, R. (2018). Your Leadership Style: A management development module for educational leaders. Research for Better Schools, Inc.
  12. Tenedero, H. S (2018). Creating and Enhanced Learning Environment through Individual learning styles. International Peer Reviewed Journal.
  13. Uy, J. (2019). ‘’Leadership Styles of School Administrators’’ Educational Administration in Turkey. Kultur Koleji Egitim Vakti. 31-38
  14. Whitaker, B. (2017). Instructional leadership and principal visibility. Clearing House, 70 (3), 155-157.
  15. Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in Organizations. 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 251-280.