HomeJPAIR Multidisciplinary Research Journalvol. 53 no. 3 (2023)

Contribution of Agama Arbitration Council as an Alternative Mode for Conflict Resolution Adopted By Shari’ah Courts in South Central Mindanao

Saidamin P. Bagolong

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Issuing the Code of Muslim Personal Laws of the Philippines was a constitutional justification for the free exercise of Religion and cultural communities. This study aimed to ascertain the relationship between the contributions of the Agama Arbitration Council as an alternative mode for conflict resolution adopted by the Shari’ah Courts in South Central Mindanao. The study utilized a descriptive correlation to the 100 respondents composed of judges, clerks of courts, counselors, staff, and asatidz in the cities of Cotabato and Kidapawan, including provinces of Maguindanao, Sultan Kudarat, and North Cotabato. The researcher-made survey questionnaire was used and validated by experts, and its reliability was tested on alpha Cronbach. The Pearson r was used to analyze the data. The results found a high positive correlation between the Agama Arbitration Council as an Alternative Mode for Conflict Resolution adopted by the Shari’ah Courts in terms of divorce (talaq), subsequent marriage, and offense against customary law and its attainment of objectives on the proper conduct of arbitration procedure and the speedy disposition of cases. Hence, the Agama Arbitration Council served as a viable process instead of litigation in the regular courts. It is recommended to incorporate them as essential in the legal system of Muslims in the Philippines.



References:

  1. Abahussain, A. (2018). The Rising Tide Of Change: The Saudi Arabian Women In Conflict Resolution. Dispute Resolution Journal, 73(2), 91-107.
  2. Abeling-Judge, D. (2018). Temporal Consideration of the Marriage Effect. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, pp. 4, 188–208.
  3. Al-Ramahi, A. (2008). Sulh is a crucial part of Islamic arbitration. LSE Law. Society and Economy Working Papers, 12, 2008.
  4. Arifin, S. R. M. (2018). Ethical considerations in qualitative study. International Journal of Care Scholars, 1(2), 30–33.
  5. Bara-Acal, A. M., & Astih, A. J. (1998). Muslim law on personal status in the Philippines. Central Professional Books.
  6. Barodi, N. B. S. S. (2021). The Shari'ah Legal Profession in the Philippines: The Status Quo and Cues of Its Future. IIUMLJ29, 331.
  7. Batt, R., & Kahn, L. (2021). Data transparency and methods in qualitative and quantitative research: Letter from the editors. ILR Review, 74(5), 1079–1082.
  8. Baxter, J., & Eyles, J. (1997). Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing the rigor of interview analysis. Institute of British Geographers, 22(4), 505–525.
  9. Benhalim, R. (2019). The Case for American Muslim Arbitration. Wis. L. Rev., p. 531.
  10. Beth, S. (2017). Translating Filartiga: A comparative and international law analysis of domestic remedies for international human rights violations. In Challenges in International Human Rights Law (pp. 565–622). Routledge.
  11. Bitsch, V. (2005). Qualitative research: A grounded theory and evaluation criteria. Journal of Agribusiness, 23(345-2016–15096), 75–91.
  12. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2004). Narrative inquiry: Experience and stories in qualitative research. John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Cole, T. (2009). Authority and contemporary international arbitration. La. L. Rev., pp. 70, 801.
  14. Collins, H., & Wray-Bliss, E. (2005). Discriminating ethics. Human Relations, 58(6), 799–824.
  15. Deinla, I. (2019). Legal Hybridity, Trust, and the Legitimacy of the Shari'ah in the Bangsamoro. Law & Policy41(2), 198–219.
  16. Deinla, I. (2018). Beyond political accommodation–making Shari’ah justice work for women in the Bangsamoro1.
  17. Faris, J. A. (1995). An Analysis of the Theory and Principles of Alternative Dispute Resolution [Unpublished Doctoral]. University of South Africa.
  18. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative approach. Qualitative Research Handbook, 2(163–194), p. 105.
  19. Huda, S. (2019). Gender, personal laws and practices of the Bengali Barua Buddhists of Bangladesh. In Revisiting Personal Laws in Bangladesh (pp. 195–211). Brill Nijhoff.
  20. Huda, M. N. (2020). Activities of Islamic SharÄ«’ah Council and Muslim Arbitration Tribunal to Apply Islamic Law in England and Wales. Al-Milal: Journal of Religion and Thought, 2(2), 1–16.
  21. Janusheva, V. (2022). A Review of the qualitative research questions relevance. International Journal of Education-TEACHER, pp. 24, 25–33.
  22. Jones, J., & Shanneik, Y. (2020). Reformulating Muslim Matrimony: Islamic Marriage and Divorce in the Contemporary United Kingdom and Europe. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 40(1), 1-5.
  23. Kamali, M. H. (2016). Peace in the Islamic Tradition: One Vision, Multiple Pathways. ICR Journal, 7(2), 157-187.
  24. Kamarudin, A., & Shukor, A. (2022). Shari'ah Court's Decision and Child Custody Respondents' View After Divorce in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor.
  25. Lahman, M. K. E., Thomas, R., & Teman, E. D. (2023). A good name: Pseudonyms in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 29(6), 678–685
  26. Liana, P., & Panjalu, G. F. (2020). Upaya Memantapkan Pasangan Calon Pengantin Melalui Program Belajar Rahasia Nikah (Berkah) Perspektif Maqasid Shari’ah (Studi Kasus Kantor Urusan Agama Kecamatan Sawahan Surabaya). Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam9(1).
  27. Maulizar, O. (2022). Kewenangan Peradilan Agama Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syari’ah. Al-Ilmu8(2), 72-88.
  28. Nasla, K., & Ambily, P. (2020). Muslim Women [protection of rights on marriage] Act, 2019: A critical analysis.
  29. Oladosu-Uthman, H. (2020). The Contributions of Independent Shari'ah Panel (ISP) in Curbing Incidences of Divorce (Talâq) Practices among Muslims in Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria. Ibadan Journal of Humanistic Studies30(1), 156-173.
  30. Omoola, S. O., & Nasir, M. A. (2020). Shari’ah in the English Courts: Towards a New Theory of Convergence of Laws in England. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 32(3), 450-460.
  31. Patwari, S., & Ali, A. N. (2020). Muslim Women’s Right to Divorce and Gender Equality Issues in Bangladesh: A Proposal for Review of Current Laws. Journal of International Women's Studies, 21(6), 50-79.
  32. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Essentials of nursing research approach: Appraising evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  33. Roberts, C. (2017). On the definition of crimes against humanity and other widespread or systematic human rights violations. U. Pa. JL & Soc. Change, pp. 20, 1.
  34. Siregar, A. N. (2021). Dampak perceraian di luar Pengadilan Agama terhadap Hadhanah perspektif teori Maqashid Al-Syari’ah Jasser Auda: Studi di Desa Tanjung Medan Kec. Kampung Rakyat, Kab. Labuhanbatu Selatan, Prov. Sumatera Utara (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim).
  35. Sofiana, R., & Utama, S. (2021). Effectiveness of Shari'ah Economic and Business Dispute Resolution through Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). TERAJU: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum3(01), 41-49.
  36. Sulistiyono, A., Supaat, D. I., Palil, M. R., & Rosidah, Z. N. (2018). Strengthening Of Sharia Principles Among National Shari'ah Arbitration Board Arbitrators In The Settlement Of Sharia Economic Disputes.
  37. Wahb, Y. A. (2022). Faith-Based Divorce Proceedings: Alternative Dispute Resolutions for Canadian Muslims. Canadian Family Law Quarterly.
  38. Wildan, D. (2016). Penetapan Talak Bid’i di Pengadilan Agama Jombang dalam perspektif Maqasid Shari’ah Tahir Bin ‘A shur (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim).