HomeJournal of Interdisciplinary Perspectivesvol. 2 no. 5 (2024)

English Teachers’ Readiness for Home-Based Learning: Its Relationship to Teachers’ Performance

Mary Cecille C Arciaga

Discipline: Psychology

 

Abstract:

The researcher aimed to determine the relationship between English teachers' readiness for home-based learning and their performance. The study's presumed hypothesis was tested using a descriptive correlational design with a significance level of 0.05. The data were analyzed using a variety of statistical measures, including frequency count, mean, and multiple regression analysis, to answer the study question. Furthermore, the researcher used a reliable and valid instrument designed by Mansor et al. (2021) to measure the level of readiness for home-based learning among teacher respondents. Meanwhile, a documentary analysis was used to evaluate the English teachers' performance. The study was evaluated and approved for implementation by the LCUP-REC. To assure consistency, the researcher asked 252 teachers from nine (9) schools in one of Bulacan's educational districts to complete the standardized surveys using Google Form while maintaining rigid anonymity. The data were examined and handled statistically using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS). The results indicated a value larger than the predetermined 0.05 threshold of significance. The researcher failed to reject the null hypothesis, which states that there is not a significant relationship between English teachers' readiness for home-based learning and their performance. Furthermore, the study proposed a faculty development program concentrating on English language competency as part of teachers' ongoing professional development to improve their level of readiness for home-based learning, particularly in terms of subjective norms.



References:

  1. Abarro, J. O. (2018). Factors affecting the performance of public school teachers in the division of Antipolo City, Philippines. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) https://www.irjet.net/archives, 5.
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  3. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self‐efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 32(4), 665-683.
  4. Bukoye, R. O. (2019). Utilization of instruction materials as tools for effective academic performance of students: Implications for counselling. In Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings (Vol. 2, No. 21, p. 1395).
  5. Chang, G. C., & Yano, S. (2020). How are countries addressing the Covid-19 challenges in education? A snapshot of policy measures. Retrieved May 4, 2020.
  6. Gan, Y. & Bilige, S. (2019). Parental involvement in home-based education and children’s academic achievement in China. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 47(12), 1-15.
  7. Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2018). Teaching and learning with technology:  Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191.
  8. Kareem, N. N. (2017). The importance of using information communication technology f        or learning and teaching the English language in Kurdistan of Iraq.
  9. Mansor, A. N., Zabarani, N. H., Jamaludin, K. A., Mohd Nor, M. Y., Alias, B. S., &  Mansor, A. Z. (2021). Home-based learning (HBL) teacher readiness scale: Instrument development and demographic analysis. Sustainability, 13(4), 2228.
  10. Olivo, M. G. (2021). Parents’ Perception on Printed Modular Distance Learning in Canarem Elementary School: Basis for Proposed Action Plan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(4), 296-309.
  11. Panhoon, S., & Wongwanich, S. (2018). An analysis of teacher feedback for improving teaching quality in primary schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4124-4130.
  12. Pek, L. S., & Mee, R. W. M. (2020). Parental involvement on child’s education at home during school lockdown. JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), 4(2), 192-196.
  13. Razkane, H., Sayeh, A. Y., & Yeou, M. (2022). University Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Distance Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic: Hurdles, Challenges, and Take-away Lessons. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 3(1), e02201.
  14. Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. OECD. Retrieved April, 14(2020), 2020-04.
  15. Sali, A. H. A. (2020). Rethinking distance education in Covid-19 pandemic: Perspectives on education equity in the ‘new normal’. Jayapangus Press Books, 33-55.
  16. Turvey, K., & Pachler, N. (2020). Design principles for fostering pedagogical provenance through research in technology supported learning. Computers & Education, 146, 103736.
  17. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Unesco). (2020). Distance learning strategies in response to COVID-19 school closures. UNESCO COVID-19 Education Response Education Sector Issue Notes, 2(1), 1-8.