HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 16 no. 2 (2023)

Innovating Education: Development and Validation of the Teacher Adviser Systematic Kit (TASK) Using Microsoft Excel for Enhanced Teacher Productivity

Danilo Macapugas | Aiselle Jasen Anadia-Macapugas

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Teachers no longer just teach in the classroom but are also compelled to provide reports required by DepEd personnel. The number of tasks to be done is increasing. Without tools and methodologies that can simplify these tasks, it can become a burden to teachers and may cause a problem. This study, funded by the Basic Education Research Fund of the DepEd, attempts to validate a researcherdeveloped system called Teacher Adviser Systematic Kit (TASK) that can be used by teachers. The methodology of this study involved a systematic tool validation process and tool application using the Guidelines for the Development and Validation of Spreadsheets by Peter M. Esch following the OECD Principles of GLP from an Article in The Quality Assurance Journal 2010. The TASK was subjected to the different steps in the qualification process, which include Installation Qualification (IQ), Operational Qualification (OQ), and Performance Qualification (PQ). The researchers also used a descriptive qualitative approach to know the respondent’s point of view on the usefulness of the TASK. Respondents strongly agree that the TASK is an effective tool in the efficient and simplified preparation of DepEd school forms that are prepared by the advisers at the end of the quarter and can contribute to the improved and simplified work for teachers.



References:

  1. Boyce, C. and Neale, P. (2006) Conducting In-Depth Interview: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. Pathfinder International Tool Series, Monitoring and Evaluation-2. Retrieved from http://www.pathfind.org/site/DocServer/m_e_tool_series_indepth_interviews.pdf?docID=630
  2. David, C., Albert, J.R., and Vizmanos, J.F., (February 2019). Pressures on public school teachers and implications on quality. Philippine Institute of Development Studies (PIDS). ISSN 2508- 0865. No. 2019-01. 
  3. Day, C., Kington, A., & Stobart, G. (2018). Teacher workload and wellbeing: A review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 111-128.
  4. Deloitte Insights. (2015). Work Simplification | Deloitte Insights | Global Human Capital Trends 2015. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/tr/Documents/human-capital/GlobalHumanCapitalTrends2015.pdf
  5. Edutopia. (2020, August 11). Redefining the Role of the Teacher: It's a Multifaceted Profession.
  6. Esch, P., Moor, C., Schmid, B., Albertini, S., Hassler, S., Donzé6, D. and Saxer, H.P. 2010. Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) – Guidelines for the Development and Validation of Spreadsheets. The Quality Assurance Journal Ferguson. D. CSP; The Gilbreth Network, http://gilbrefunetwork.com
  7. Higgins, J., Hallgarten, C., & Coe, S. (2019). A Systematic Review of the Impact of Technology on Teacher Workload. Teacher Development, 23(2-3), 207-228.
  8. Kitaw, D and Belachew, T. 2017. WORK SIMPLIFICATION FOR PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT A case study: Kaliti Metal Products Factory Journal of EEA, VoL 24
  9. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2021). Teacher workload and job satisfaction: An analysis of data from the 2018 National Teacher and Principal Survey. U.S. Department of Education.
  10. Prokopenko, J. and North, K. 1997. Productivity and Quality Management. Modular Programme, 1997.
  11. Rosales, R., Molon M.L., G. Arias B. Development and Validation of the Means of Verification – Automated Assessment Tool: An Action Research., 2018
  12. Sharma, A., & Singh, S. (2021). The Impact of Technology on Teacher Productivity in the Classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, 101725.
  13. Smith, A., Brown, C., & Jones, M. (2020). Work Simplification: A Time-Tested Strategy for Enhancing Efficiency and Reducing Costs. International Journal of Business Process Management, 15(3), 345-362.
  14. Springer, M. C., Swanson, C. B., & Glazer, M. S. (2018). Teacher productivity and student learning: A review of the literature. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 1-28.
  15. The Education Policy Research Unit. (2020). The relationship between teacher satisfaction and student achievement. Retrieved from https://coe.arizona.edu/education-policy-center