HomeDAVAO RESEARCH JOURNALvol. 5 no. 1 (2002)

Yam Production with or without Trellisingi

Emma Ruth V. Bayogan | Necito A. Baldoz

Discipline: agricultural sciences

 

Abstract:

A 72 m2 area in Don Martin Marundan, Mati, Davao Oriental was planted to pretreated and pre-sprouted yam setts arranged in a randomized complete block design to compare the tuber yield and costs when yams are grown with or without trellis. On a 6 m2 area, mean tuber yields of non-trellised and trellised (single strand and double strands of tie wire tied on posts 6 m apart) were not significantly different. With computed tuber yields per hectare however, differences of up to 54 tons may easily be translated to profits. Bulbil yields represented from 16 to 27% of the total yield (tubers + bulbils). Cost and return analysis gave 13.7 and 24.9 % differences in profits when plants were trellised and yam tuber price per kilogram was pegged at P7.5C



References:

  1. Bayot, A. J. 1994. Response of Ubi to Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers Grown with and Without Trellis. The Phil. J. ofP1ant Industry. 59 (4): 81-90.
  2. Nwosu, N. A. 1975. Recent developments in vegetative propagation of edible yam (Dioscorea species). Proc. Agric. Soc., Nigeria. 12:15.
  3. Onwueme, I. C. 1978. The Tropical Tuber Crops. New York: John Wiley and Sons. pp 1-102.
  4. Perez, R. D. 2000. Ubi + Mungbean + Pole Sitao Cropping Pattern. Paper presented during the 12th DA In-house R and D Review. Grand Men Seng Hotel, Davao City. June 2. 6 pp.
  5. Pido, N.L. and M.B. Pepito. 1987. Ubi: A Guide to its Culture and Use. PRCRTC ViSCA, Baybay, Leyte.
  6. Villanueva, M.R. 1986. Technology for Yam and Taro Production in Southeast Asia TheRadix 8. (1): 1-6.