HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 16 no. 1 (2023)

Instructional Leadership, Students' Achievements and Attitudes of National High Schools in Ormoc City Division

Arthur Olorvida

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study explored the relationship between instructional leadership, students' achievement, and attitudes in National High Schools in Ormoc City for the 2016-2017 school year. A descriptive survey method was used, with questionnaires distributed to 220 teachers, 14 principals, and 216 students. The research found a significant relationship between demographic profile, instructional leadership, teaching effectiveness, and classroom management. Personal and professional demographic profiles also influenced teaching effectiveness and classroom management. However, classroom management did not significantly impact students' achievement in English, Science, and Mathematics subjects. Mathematics achievement was significantly related to overall student achievement in these subjects. The study recommends updating the ESM program/curriculum, updating teachers' instructional requirements, and fostering strong coordination and empowerment of stakeholders.



References:

  1. Adediwura, A. A., & Tayo, B. (2007). Perception of teachers' knowledge, attitude and teaching skills as predictor of academic performance in Nigerian secondary schools. Educational Research and Reviews, 2(7), 165.
  2. Adu, E. O., & Olatundun, S. O. (2007). Teachers' perception of teaching as correlates of students' academic performance in Oyo state, Nigeria. Essays in education, 20(1), 6.
  3. Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science education, 87(3), 352-377.
  4. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers' perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of educational administration, 38(2), 130-141.
  5. Bush, T. (2011). The micropolitics of educational change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(6), 642-645.
  6. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know?. School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553-571.
  7. Coleman, B., & McNeese, M. N. (2009). From home to school: The relationship among parental involvement, student motivation, and academic achievement. International Journal of Learning, 16(7).
  8. Corpuz, V. A. F. (2011). Error correction in second language writing: Teachers' beliefs, practices, and students' preferences (Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology).
  9. Dewey, J. (2010). The need for a philosophy of education (1934). Schools, 7(2), 244-245.
  10. Eitle, T. M. (2005). Do gender and race matter? Explaining the relationship between sports participation and achievement. Sociological Spectrum, 25(2), 177-195.
  11. Farr, S. (2011). Leadership, Not Magic. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 28-33.
  12. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American educational research journal, 38(4), 915-945.
  13. Gascoigne, C. (2012). Toward an understanding of the relationship between classroom climate and performance in postsecondary French: An application of the Classroom Climate Inventory. Foreign Language Annals, 45(2), 193-202.
  14. Hallinger, P. (1992). School leadership development: An introduction. Education and Urban Society, 24(3), 300-316.
  15. Hallinger, P. (2009). Leadership for the 21st century schools: From instructional leadership to leadership for learning. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2017/
  16. LePage, Pamela, Linda Darling-Hammond, Hanife Akar, Cris Gutierrez, Evelyn Jenkins-Gunn, and Kathy Rosebrock. "Classroom Management." (2005).
  17. Lunenberg, M., Dengerink, J., & Korthagen, F. (2014). The professional teacher educator: Roles, behaviour, and professional development of teacher educators. Springer Science & Business Media.
  18. Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Morin, A. J., Abduljabbar, A. S., & Köller, O. (2012). Classroom climate and contextual effects: Conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects. Educational psychologist, 47(2), 106-124.
  19. Marzano, R. J. (2004). Building background knowledge for academic achievement: Research on what works in schools. Ascd.
  20. Nuangchalerm, P. (2009). Implementing Professional Experiences to Prepare Preservice Science Teachers. Online Submission, 4(4), 388-391.
  21. Pama, A. B., Dulla, L. B., & DeLeon, R. C. (2013). Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: Does faculty profile really matter. Catalyst, 8(1), 94-102.
  22. Prochnow, J., Macfarlane, A. H., & Glynn, T. (2011). Responding to challenging behaviour: Heart, head, and hand. Responsive pedagogy: Engaging restoratively with challenging behaviour, 219-235.
  23. Quilici, J. L., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Teaching students to recognize structural similarities between statistics word problems. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 16(3), 325-342.
  24. Robin, B. R. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory into practice, 47(3), 220-228.
  25. Salo, P., Nylund, J., & Stjernstrøm, E. (2015). On the practice architectures of instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 490-506.
  26. Sandholtz, J. H. (2001). Learning to teach with technology: A comparison of teacher development programs. Journal of technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 349-374.
  27. Scheerens, J. (2016). Educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness. A critical review of the knowledge base, 389.
  28. Smylie, M. A. (1995). New perspectives on teacher leadership. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 3-7.
  29. Tinio, M. F. (2009). Academic engagement scale for grade school students. The assessment handbook, 2(1), 64-75.
  30. Tomlinson, S. (2005). Education in a post-welfare society. McGraw-Hill Education (U.K.).
  31. Tymms, P., Merrell, C., & Bailey, K. (2018). The long-term impact of effective teaching. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(2), 242-261.
  32. Ward, M. J. (1996). Coming of age in the age of self-determination. Self-determination across the life span, 3-16.
  33. Waters, J. T., & Marzano, R. J. (2006). School district leadership that works: The effect of superintendent leadership on student achievement (pp. 2006-2008). Denver^ eCO CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL).
  34. Wiburg, K. M., & Brown, S. (2007). Translating lesson study from Japan to the United States. Lesson study communities increasing achievement with diverse students, 1-17.