HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 3 no. 4 (2022)

Coping Mechanism of Disadvantaged Learners During Online Learning

John Ivan Cleofe | Jezel Galvez | Carl Joi Gabriel | Gerald Gorospe | Gemson Revilla

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study explored learners’coping mechanism during online learning at Colegio de San Juan de Letran-Manaoag for the Academic Year 2021-2022. Snowball sampling was used by the researchers in selecting the informants and data was gathered through a semi- structured interview. Findings revealed that the challenges being encountered by the disadvantaged learners during online learning was intermittent internet connection, digital divide, unconducive learning environment, financial incapability and overloaded academic activities. To cope up with these challenges, disadvantaged learners are in need of peer support, side hustles, crafting of study plan, devising methods and emotional comfort. This study found out that intermittent connection and digital divide mostly affects the active participation of these learners in the conduct of online learning. Thus, giving them the disadvantages of being unable to provide these necessities for effective learning. Lastly, emotional Comfort by their peers and especially their instructors is highly needed to help them persevere in finishing their studies despite challenging times for them



References:

  1. Avila et al, (2020). Motivation and Learning Strategies of Education Students in Online Learning during Pandemic.
  2. Calo et al, (2021). Students’ Struggles and their Coping Mechanisms in the New Normal. Napolan National High School.
  3. Caunca, J.L. (2021). Coping up with the ‘New Normal’ Education.
  4. Cleofe (2022). Emergency Remote Education: A Challenge on Enhancing Learners’ Learning Experience in Edukasyon sa Pagpakatao. [Unpublished Manuscript].
  5. Comendador et al, (2021). Coping Mechanism of the Senior High School Students during COVID-19 Pandemic Cuisia-Villanueva, M.C, & Núñez, J. (2020). A Study on the Impact of Socioeconomic S t a t u s o n E m e r g e n c y E l e c t r o n i c Learning during the Co ronavirus Lock Down.
  6. Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, Boston, MA, London, Pearson.
  7. Dewit, P. (2020). 6 Reasons Students Aren’t Showing for Virtual Learning.
  8. Essel, G. & Owusu, P. (2017). Causes of students’ stress, its effects on their academic success, and stress management by students (Master’s thesis, Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences, Finland).
  9. Gearing, R. E. 2004. Bracketing in Research: A Typology. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 1429-1452 Haslamoun, N.A.,& Daouk, L. (2019). Exploring The Teaching Experiences Of Teachers Using Computer-Based
  10. Assessments When Teaching Interactive Multimedia Classes. DOI: 10.33965/celda2019_201911L016 Kendra, C. (2020). ProblemSolving Strategies and Obstacles .
  11. Li, C. & Lalani, F. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how. Experiences and Coping Strategies of College Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
  12. NBER Working Paper No. 28803 May 2021 JEL No. I23, I31,J24
  13. Muñoz, M. (2020). OPINION: Low-income students are the most disadvantaged in online learning.
  14. O’Keefe, J. (2020, April 28). Distance learning poses challenges for students, teachers. Business Mirror.
  15. Rodriguez-Planas, N. (2020). Hitting Where It Hurst Most: COVID19 and Low-Income Urban College Students.
  16. City University of New York, Queens College, Working paper.
  17. Saavedra, J. (2020, March 30). Educational challenges and opportunities of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic [Blog post].
  18. Tufford, L. & Newman, P. 2012. Bracketing in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Social Work, 11, 80-96.