HomeDAVAO RESEARCH JOURNALvol. 14 no. 1 (2023)

Difficulties and coping strategies in understanding mathematical concepts in a private higher education in Tagum City, Davao del Norte, Philippines

Arrel Jay B. Velez | Divine Grace F. Dayaganon | Jayvee C. Robigid | Juzanni Demorito | Jhonnel P. Villegas | Dan O. Gomez

 

Abstract:

Understanding mathematical concepts involve developing an intuitive grasp of the underlying ideas and principles that govern mathematical operations and relationships. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the difficulties and coping strategies in understanding mathematical concepts. This study used an explanatory sequential research design through the collection and analysis of quantitative data followed by a qualitative inquiry. To collect data, the researchers developed questionnaires for the quantitative and qualitative inquiries, which were validated by external experts. The sample of the study for the quantitative part included conveniently selected 297 students from a private Higher Education Institution (HEI) in Tagum City, Davao del Norte, Philippines, in the academic year 2017-2018. In addition, seven (7) individuals participated in the Key Informant Interviews (KIIs). One session of Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was also organized with seven firstyear students enrolled during the second semester of S.Y. 2017-2018. Five skills areas were examined: number fact, arithmetic, language, informational, and visual. Based on the results, students find difficulties in understanding mathematical concepts, specifically in visualizing mathematical concepts and manipulating geometrical shapes and spaces meaningfully. The students also demonstrated difficulties in analyzing the problem, understanding the concept, identifying the correct solution, establishing the equation, and simplifying the expression. In addition, the students cope with the difficulties through selfperseverance, expert consultation, reading and studying, constant practice, and confidence building. Mathematics teachers are recommended to design need-based teaching strategies to optimize student learning.



References:

  1. Arum, D.P., Kusmayadi, T.A, and Pramudya, I.(2018).   Students’s   difficulties   in probabilistic  problem-solving.  Journal of     Physics.     https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012098
  2. Ayuwanti,  I.,  Marsigit,  M.,  and  Siswoyo,  D.2021.   Teacher-student   interaction   in   Mathematics  learning. International Journal  of  Evaluation  and  Research  in  Education.    https://doi:10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21184
  3. Björklund,  C.,  A.  Kullberg,  and  U.  R.  Kempe.(2019).   Structuring   Versus   Counting:   Critical    Ways    of    Using    Fingers    in    Subtraction. ZDM         Mathematics         Education     51     (1):     13–24.     https://doi:10.1007/s11858- 018-0962-0
  4. Brezavšček, A., Jerebic, J., Rus, G., & Žnidaršič,A.    (2020).    Factors    influencing mathematics achievement of University students of social sciences. Mathematics, 8(12),      2134. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122134
  5. Bringula, R., Reguyal, J. J., Tan, D. D., & Ulfa,S.  (2021).  Mathematics  self-concept and    challenges    of    learners    in    an    online   learning   environment   during   COVID-19   pandemic.   Smart   Learning   Environments,          8(1).          https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00168-5
  6. Cheng,  Z.-J.  (2012).  Teaching  Young  ChildrenDecomposition     Strategies     to     Solve     Addition   Problems:   An   Experimental   Study. The   Journal   of   Mathematical   Behavior     31     (1):     29–47.     https://doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.09.002
  7. Creswell,   J.W.   (2009).      Research   Design:Qualitative,    Quantitative    and    Mixed    Methods  Approaches.  Singapore:  Sage  Publications Asia-Pacific.
  8. Haryanti, M., Herman, T. and Prabawanto, S.(2019).  Analysis  of  students’  error  in solving  Mathematical  word  problems in  geometry.  Journal  of  Physics.  https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042084
  9. Hoque,  E.  (2018).  Memorization:  A  ProvenMethod   of   Learning. International Journal  of  Applied  Research  22(1):  142-150.
  10. Kibe, D. and Mawira, P. (2018). Investigatingthe  Effectiveness  of  a  Math  Practice Paper   in   Teaching   and   Learning   of   Mathematics. International  Journal  of  Scientific   and   Research   Publications 10(7):537-542.          https://doi:10.29322/IJSRP.10.07.2020.p10357
  11. Kullberg, A., C. Björklund, I. Brkovic, and U. R.Kempe.   (2020).   Effects   of   Learning   Addition  and  Subtraction  in  Preschool  by Making the First Ten Numbers and Their   Relations   Visible   with   Finger   Patterns. Educational      Studies      in      Mathematics  103  (2):  157–172.  https://doi:10.1007/s10649- 019-09927-1
  12. Laily,  R.  (2018).  The  Analysis  on  Students’Difficulties    in    Doing    Reading Comprehension  Final  Test.  Metathesis Journal  of  English  Language  Literature  and     Teaching     2(2):     253.     https://doi:10.31002/metathesis.v2i2.958
  13. Mangulabhan,    M.    (2016). Difficultiesencountered     by     the     students     in     mathematical     problems.     Academia.edu   -   Share   research.   https://www.academia.edu/34837407/difficulties_encountered_by_the_students_in_Mathematical_problems
  14. Mokhtar, M. A. M., Ayub, A. F. M., Said, R. R., &Mustakim, S. S. (2019). Analysis of Year Four  Pupils’  Difficulties  in  Solving Mathematical   Problems   Involving Fraction. International     Journal     of     Academic   Research   in   Business   and   Social Sciences, 9(11), 1560–1569. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i11/6766
  15. Moneva, J. and Valle, A. (2020). Difficulty inMathematics:  Close  Assistance  and Self-Confidence. Journal  of  Studies  in  Education 10(1), 117. https://doi:10.5296/jse.v10i1.16460
  16. Muchoko,  C.,  Jupri,  A.  and  Prabawanto,  S.(2019).          Algebraic          visualization          difficulties  of  students  in  junior  high school. Journal    of    Physics.    https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032108
  17. Preclaro  M.  (2019).  The  acquisition  ofMathematics skills of Filipino children with  learning  difficulties  Issues  and challenges
  18. Reddy, M. and Panacharoensawad, B. (2017).Students  Problem-Solving  Difficulties and     Implications     in     Physics:     An     Empirical Study on Influencing Factors. Journal of Education and Practice.
  19. Sakilah,  N.,  Rini,  C.,  Magdalena,  I.,  andUnaenah,     E.     (2018).     Analysis     of     Difficulties in Mathematics Learning In Second  Grade  Of  Elementary  Schools  (Case  Study  in  One  of  South  Jakarta  Elementary Schools). The 1st PGSD UST International Conference on Education.
  20. Simatupang, R., Napitupulu, E. and Syahputra,E.  (2019).  Analysis  of  Mathematical Problem-Solving Abilities Taught Using Problem-Based     Learning.     American Journal of Educational Research. https://doi:10.12691/education-7-11-6
  21. Tsamir, P., D. Tirosh, E. Levenson, M. Tabach,and R. Barkai. (2015). “Analyzing Number Composition       and       Decomposition       Activities      in      Kindergarten      from      a      Numeracy      Perspective.”      ZDM Mathematics Education 47 (4): 639–651. https://doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0668-5
  22. Utami,  C.  T.,  Mardiyana,  &  Triyanto.  (2019).Profile   of   students’   mathematical representation      ability      in      solving      geometry   problems.   IOP   Conference   Series:      Earth      and      Environmental      Science,      243,      012123.      https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012123
  23. Warger,    C.    (2018,    September    28).    Usevisualization strategies to help students solve math word problems. Exceptional Innovations.        https://www.exinn.net/use-visualization-strategies-to-help-students-solve-math-word-problems/.
  24. Yang, Z., Yang, X., Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Pei, G.,and   Xu,   B.   (2021).   The   emergence   of        mathematical        understanding:        Connecting to the closest superordinate and  convertible  concepts.  Frontiers  in  Psychology,  12.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.525493