HomeDAVAO RESEARCH JOURNALvol. 12 no. 3 (2020)

Quantifying tree height and canopy structure in a forest in Davao Oriental State College of Science and Technology, Mati City, Davao Oriental

Rancil Quin Salang

 

Abstract:

Forests are landscapes dominated by trees and cover approximately 30% of the earth’s land surface, housing most of its biodiversity. This study aimed to quantify the tree height and canopy structure of a man-made forest in the locality, particularly the density, relative density, frequency, relative frequency, coverage, relative coverage, diversity, and importance value of the trees in the study area. The establishment of the study area was conducted on 8, September 2017, and a transect-quadrat method was employed to assess the trees in the forest. Two (2) species of trees were found in the study area. These were paper tree (Gmelina arborea) and mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla). The densest tree species was mahogany with 0.53 followed by paper tree with 0.47. Mahogany was also observed to have a higher frequency than paper tree. Paper tree in the study area has larger canopy coverage and circumference at breast height than mahogany attributed to its fast-growing nature. The diversity of tree species in the study area was found to be low, attaining only 0.47 on the Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index and 0.69 on Simpson’s Diversity Index due to the small number of tree species present. The results of the importance value were low, with 1.32 for paper tree and 1.68 for mahogany since they are relatively young and have similar number of individuals.



References:

  1. Bowers, M. A., and Harris, L. C. (1994). A large-scale metapopulation model of interspecific competition and environmental change. Ecological   Modelling, 72(3-4), 251-273.
  2. Cannell, M. G., and Grace, J. (1993). Competition for light: detection, measurement, and quantification. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23(10), 1969-1979.
  3. Dvorak, W. S. (2004). World view of Gmelina arborea: opportunities and    challenges. New Forests, 28, 111-126.
  4. Ford, E. D., and Sorrensen, K. A. (1992). Theory and models of inter-plant competition as a spatial process. In ‘Individual-based models and approaches          in ecology’.(Eds DL DeAngelis, LJ Gross) pp. 363–407.
  5. Heckbert, S., Costanza, R., Poloczanska, E. S., and Richardson, A. J. (2011). 12.10–Climate regulation as a service from estuarine and coastal   ecosystems. Treatise on estuarine and coastal science, 199-216.
  6. Kenkel, N., Hendrie, M. L., and Bella, I. E. (1997). A longā€term study of Pinus banksiana population dynamics. Journal of Vegetation Science, 8(2), 241-254.
  7. Kimmins, J. H. (2007). Forest Ecosystem Management: Miracle or Mirage? Managing forWildlife Habitat in West-side Production Forests, 695,19.
  8. Krieger, D. J. (2001). Economic value of forest ecosystem services: a review.
  9. Lanting, M. V., and Palaypayon, C. M. (2002) Forest tree species with medicinal   uses. Ecosystems Research and Development Bureau, Department of             Environment and Natural Resources. Volume 11
  10. Lamb, A. (1968). Gmelina arborea. Commenwealth Forestry Institute, University of Oxford.
  11. Powell, R. D. (1990). The functional forms of density-dependent birth and death rates in diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) explain why it has not been controlled by Urophora affinis, U. quadrifasciata and Sphenoptera jugoslavica.            In Proc. VII Int. Symp. on Biol. Control of Weeds (pp. 195-202).
  12. Ollinger, S. V., Richardson, A. D., Martin, M. E., Hollinger, D. Y., Frolking, S. E.,   Reich, P. B., and Schmid, H. P. (2008). Canopy nitrogen, carbon assimilation, and albedo in temperate and boreal forests: Functional relations and potential climate feedbacks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(49),19336-19341.
  13. Orwa, C., Mutua, A., Kindt, R., Jamnadass, R., and Anthony, S. (2009). Tamarindus indica. Agroforest Database: A tree reference and selection guide version, 4,1-6.
  14. Schwinning, S., and Fox, G. A. (1995). Population dynamic consequences of competitive symmetry in annual plants. Oikos, 422-432.