HomeDAVAO RESEARCH JOURNALvol. 12 no. 4 (2020)

Capability Level and Development Priority of Learning Environment and Diversity of Learners’ Domain

Saturnino E Dalagan Jr | Maria Kristina Atugan

Discipline: Environmental Science

 

Abstract:

Creating a conducive learning environment has been a target to build a supportive and peaceful classroom where diverse learners were engaged for them to learn better. This research analyzed the Teacher’s capability level in performing each objective and the lived experiences of teachers on the performance of the two domains. In this, a convergent parallel mixed-method research design was used in which both quantitative and qualitative methods were conducted simultaneously. Eightyfive (85) respondents in the quantitative part and sixteen (16) informants in qualitative part of a small school category of Tarragona District, Division of Davao Oriental. The researchers used a survey questionnaire which was adapted from Resultsbased Performance Management System of 2018. Interviews and focus group discussions were also held. The majority of the respondents had the age bracket from 25 to 30 years old, with Teacher I regular permanent status, rendered from 0-3 years in service, and earned bachelor’s degree as highest educational attainment. Data analysis revealed that the Teacher’s capability level in performing each objective was high. Qualitative findings revealed that teachers managed classroom structuring properly; similarly, they ensure a well-ventilated classroom, arranged seats, and organized resources and instructional materials. The teachers managed and checked learners’ behavior; similarly, they set classroom rules, remind rules from time to time, impose positive reinforcement, and apply intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The teachers used differentiated, developmentally appropriate learning experiences; similarly, they gave tasks that were suited to the interest and learning capabilities of the students. Based on the results, it is recommended to conduct a similar study but emphasizing the remaining indicators of the mentioned two domains.



References:

  1. Ahmed, M., Ambreen, M., Hussain, I. (2018).Gender differentials among teachers’ classroom management strategies in Pakistani context. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(2), 178–193.  https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/jooeed.v5i2.2253
  2. Al-Amarat,    M.S.    (2011).    The    classroom problems     faced     teachers     at     the public schools in Tafila Province, and proposed      solutions.      International Journal  of  Educational  Sciences,  3(1), 37–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122 .2011.11890007
  3. Alakrash,  H.,  Razak,  N.A.  (2018).  English language  teachers’  readiness  for  the application    of    technology    towards fourth industrial revolution demands. Asia-Pacific    Journal    of    Information Technology and Multimedia, 7(2–2), 89–98.
  4. Aranda,  M.R.R.,  Zamora,  J.L.  (2006).  Using differentiated  instruction  in  improving the academic performance of students  in  Filipino  language.  National University, Manila City.
  5. Ball,    D.L.,    Forzani,    F.M.    (2009).The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher  education.  Journal  of  Teacher Education,  60(5),  497–511.  https://doi. org/10.1177/0022487109348479
  6. Banks, T. (2014). Creating positive learning environments: Antecedent  strategies for managing the classroom environment &    student behavior. Creative Education, 5, 519–524. https://doi.org/10.4 236 /ce.2014.57061
  7. Boyce,   C.,   Palena,   N.   (2006).   Conducting in-depth    interviews:    A    guide    for designing and conducting in- depth  interviews  for  evaluation.  In Pathfinder    International.    https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730210154225.
  8. Cardona,  R.S.,  Reyes,  A.S.,  Tangalin,  M.M. (2015). The bullying  experiences  and classroom   discipline   techniques   in an urban national high school in the Philippines:   A   basis for an anti-bullying program. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(2), 2013–2016.
  9. Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: quantitative, qualitative and mixed method   approaches   (4th   ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
  10. DepEd   Order   No.   43,   s.   2017.   Brigada Eskwela Implementing Guidelines dated March 9, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/DM_s2017_043.pdf
  11. Dilci, T., Kalkan, G.D. (2013). The problems that primary school teachers’ encounter  in  the  first  five  years  in their profession. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 42(1), 127–140.
  12. Egeberg, H., McConney, A., Price, A. (2016). Classroom  management  and  national professional  standards  for  teachers: A  review  of  the  literature  on  theory and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(7), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n7.1
  13. Iqbal, A., Rauf, M., Zeb, A., Rehman, S., Khan, W., Rashid, A., Ali, F. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions  of  classroom management, problems and its solutions: Case of Government secondary   schools   in   Chitral, Khyber Pakhtunkhawa, Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(24), 173–181.
  14. Ishtiaq, M. (2019). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative  and  mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 40. https:// doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p4
  15. Karelitz,  T.M.,  Fields,  E.,  Levy,  A.J., Martinez-Gudapakkam, A., Jablonski, E. (2011). No teacher left unqualified: How teachers and principals respond to  the  highly  qualified  mandate. Science Educator, 20(1), 1–11.
  16. Mokhele, P.R. (2014). The teacher–learner relationship in the management of discipline   in   public   high   schools. Africa     Education     Review,     3(1–2), 148–159.        https://doi.org/10.1080/18146620608540448
  17. Mugambi, M., Mwove, D., Musalia, F. G. (2015). Influence   of   teachers   on   classroom learning    environment.    Journal    of Educational Policy and EntrepreneurialResearch, 2(2), 90–102.
  18. Results-Based    Performance Management System: Manual   for   teachers   and schoolheads. (2018). Philippines, Department Education. Sadruddin,     M.M.     (2012).     Discipline improving    classroom    management through        action        research:        A professional development plan. Journal of Managerial Sciences,  6(1), 1–42.
  19. Saifi, I.L., Hussain, M., Salamat, L., Bakht, M. I.     (2018).     Impact     of     classroom management on students’ achievement at  university  level.  Asian  Journal  of Social Science & Humanities, 2(2), 13–27. https: // doi.org/April 2018
  20. Smets, W. (2017). High quality differentiated instruction – A checklist for teacher professional development on handling differences in the general education classroom. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(11), 2074–2080. https://doi.org/10.131      89/ujer.20 17.051124
  21. Sönmez,    E.,    Recepoğlu,    E.    (2019).    The relationship  between  the  classroom management skills and performance. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(1), 421– 432.       https://doi.org/10.24106/kefder-gi.3327