HomeUSI Research Journalvol. 16 no. 1 (2020)

Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Experiences in Implementing Performance Tasks

Sherry Belmoro

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

This qualitative study explored the secondary mathematics teachers’ experiences in implementing performance tasks highlighted in the philippines’ new k to 12 grading system during face-to-face class sessions. A framework analysis was used to analyze the narratives of the 18 best secondary mathematics teachers in selected provinces in the bicol region on implementing performance tasks. Findings revealed that teachers were more concerned about students’ abilities and the interestingness of the task. Best practices include efforts of teachers on monitoring and guidance, and performance tasks have positive effects on students’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Half of the teachers were able to follow the time frame allotted for performance tasks. Challenges include handling low-performing students and reviewing prerequisite knowledge and skills. Teachers view the implementation of performance tasks as an avenue to meet curriculum expectations and apply students’ knowledge in the real world. Teachers regard the implementation as beneficial to student learning; time allotment is not enough to meet curriculum expectations. Narratives revealed the points considered by teachers in implementing performance tasks, their effects on students’ learning, time frame, challenges encountered, and views on the implementation of performance tasks.



References:

  1. Attard, C. (2017). Assessment and Mathematics: Where are we going wrong?” Retrieved from: https://engagingmaths.co/ Date Retrieved: April 26, 2017
  2. Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 curriculum guide mathematics.
  3. DepEd Memorandum No. 8, Series 2015 “Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program”.
  4. Endriga,R.G. (2013). Alternative assessments and teacher readiness in the philippine k to 12 educational system. The Assessment Handbook. Vol. 10 Philippine Educational Measurement and Evaluation
  5. Levesley, J. (2011). Taking control of the assessment agenda. In Rowlett, P. (ed) Report of the HE Mathematics Curriculum Summit, York: Higher Education Academy, 21-23.
  6. Lewis, J. & Ritchie, J. (2003). Generalizing from qualitative research. Ritchie, J & Lewis, J. (Eds). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE Publications, London, 263-286.
  7. Malinao, D. Y. (2012). The Effect of performance-based assessment on the achievement of grade six pupils in mathematics. (Seminar Paper). Philippine Normal University.
  8. McTighe, J. (2015). What is a performance task? part 1. Retrieved from: https://medium.com/@DefinedLearning/what-is-a-performancetask-part-19fa0d99ead3b Date Retrieved: June 2, 2017
  9. Metin, M. (2012). Investigation of primary students’ opinions about using performance assessment in science and technology courses with respect to the different variables. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. Vol. 13, Issue 2, Article p.1 https://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/download/v13_issue2_files/metin.pdf Date Retrieved: January 7, 2018
  10. Metin, M. (2013). Teachers’ difficulties in preparation and implementation of performance task. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice. Bozok University 2013. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017658.pdf
  11. Palattao, M.J. (2013). Effects of using performance assessment tasks on students’ cognitive processes and problem-solving abilities in mathematics. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Ateneo de Manila University.
  12. Plata, S. (2016), DepEd’s 2015 Classroom Assessment Reform: A Policy Analysis. Presented at DLSU Research Congress 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/conferences/dlsu-research-congressproceedings/2016/LLI/LLI-II-03.pdf  Date Retrieved: June 5, 2017
  13. Ritchie, J. & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data Analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman, A. & Burgess, R. (Eds.) Anal. Qual. Data. Routledge, London, 173-194. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413081_chapter_9  Date Retrieved: September 16, 2017
  14. Rosaroso, R.C. (2016). Portfolio assessment as a remediation scheme. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. Vol. 4 No. 2, 83-91.
  15. Sacay, L. M. (2012). Development of UBD-based performance tasks as authentic assessments on selected topics in biology. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Philippine Normal University.
  16. Schurink, W. J., Schurink, E. M., & Poggenpoel, M. (1998). Focus group interviewing and audio-visual methodology in qualitative research. In De Vos, A. S. (Ed.). Research At Grassroots: A Primer in Care Professions. Pretoria, South Africa: Van Schaik.
  17. Subong, R. S. (2012). The effect of authentic performance tasks on grade VI pupils’ problem-solving abilities and attitudes towards mathematics. Philippine Normal University.
  18. Swan, M., & Burkhardt, H. (2012). A designer speaks Designing assessment of performance in mathematics. Educational Designer: Journal of the International Society for Design and Development in Education. http://www.educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume2/issue5/article19
  19. Windschitl (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research. 72 (2).
  20. Yesildere-Imre & Bastruk-Sahin (2016). Middle school mathematics teachers’ views and approaches to implementing mathematical tasks, 2016. Academic Journals. https://academicjournals.org/journal/ERR/article-full-text-pdf/2E51B7A61893  Date Retrieved: April 20, 2017