HomeDAVAO RESEARCH JOURNALvol. 14 no. 2 (2023)

The Relationship of Transaction Costs and Rent Seeking in Capture Fisheries

Thomas Nugroho | Mulyono N/A | Didin S Damanhuri | Ernani Lubis

Discipline: Environmental Science

 

Abstract:

The capture fisheries sector in Indonesia is expected to have a major contribution to national income. The contribution of capture fisheries to state revenue was U$ 29.44 million compared to the acquisition value of fish production reached U$ 9.67 billion in 2018. Indonesia as rich country of fish in the world suffers low income of capture fisheries whose value is only 0.25% of total national income of nature resources and economic leakage of an average U$ 552.16 billion over last twelve years. The low state revenue and economic leakage in capture fisheries sector suspected is as result of rents seeking behaviour. For predicting rents seeking behaviour, this research applicated transaction costs economy approach. The study aims to reveal relationship between transaction, transaction costs and rents seeking in capture fisheries. The research used SEM (structural equation model) constructed from measured variables (observed) and latent variables (unobserved). Respondents came from 49 government agents (63%), 5 politicians (6%), and 24 people (31%) collected via electronic mail from September to October 2021. The results of this study show that transaction costs have an impact on rents seeking in capture fisheries sector. Of all the estimated variables, there is a significant relationship at the significance level of 0.05 and 0.000 (p≤0.05).



References:

  1. Acar,  S.  (2017).  The  curse  of  natural resources.  In  the  curse  of  natural resources:   a   development   analysis in  a  comparative  context. palgrave macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58723-7
  2. Anderson,  L.  G.,  &  Seijo,  J.  C.  (2010). Bioeconomics of fisheries management. A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication.
  3. Bergfjord,  O.  J.,  &  Brandt,  U.  S.  (2010). Regulation,  risk,  and  rent  seeking behaviour. Journal   of   risk   and governance, 1(3), 1–15.
  4. Byrne,  B.  M.  (2010).  Structural  equation modeling  with  AMOS:  Basic  concepts, applications,    and  programming.  In  structural   equation   modeling   with AMOS.   Routledge    taylor  &  Francis group.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805534-23
  5. Chiles,  T.  H.,  &  McMackin,  J.  F.  (1996). Integrating  variable  risk  preferences, trust,  and  transaction  cost  economics. The  academy  of  management  review, 21(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.2307/258630
  6. Coggan, A., Whitten, S. M., & Bennett, J. (2010). Influences  of  transaction  costs  in environmental    policy. Ecological Economics,  69(9),  1777–1784.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.015
  7. Damanhuri, D. S. (2010). Ekonomi politik dan Pembangunan:   teori,   kritik,   dan Solusi  bagi  indonesia  dan  negara Sedang  berkembang  (Y.  Hana  (ed.); Cetakan  Pe). PT  Penerbit  IPB  Press.
  8. FAO. (2018). The state of world fisheries and Aquaculture   2018   -   meeting   the sustainable   development   goals.   In the  food  and  agriculture  organization of the united nations.
  9. Haryono, S., & Wardoyo, P. (2015). Structural Equation  modeling  untuk  penelitianManajemen    menggunakan    amos 18.   Intermedia  Personalia  Utama.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983907.n1909
  10. Hillman,  A.  L.  (2009).  Public  finance  and Public policy: responsibilities and   limitations   of   government: second    edition. In   Cambridge University  Press  (Vol.  53,  Issue  9).
  11. Jr,  J.  F.  H.,  Black,  W.  C.,  Babin,  B.  J., &    Anderson,    R.    E.    (2019). Multivariate  data  analysis.  Cengage.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119409137.
  12. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan. (2019). Laporan    tahunan    tahun    2018.
  13. Nota  Keuangan  dan  UU  No  19  tahun  2001 Tentang  anggaran  pendapatan  dan Belanja negara tahun anggaran 2002, 60 (2001).
  14. Kementerian  Keuangan  Republik  Indonesia. (2017). Laporan keuangan Pemerintah pusat tahun 2016: Vol. Mei.
  15. Magrath,  W.  (1989).  The  challenge  of  the commons:   the   al      location   of nonexclusive  resources. World  Bank: Environment   Department   Working Paper, 14(14).
  16. McCann, L., Colby, B., Easter, K. W., Kasterine, A.,   &   Kuperan,   K.   V.   (2005). Transaction   cost   measurement   forevaluating   environmental   policies. Ecological  Economics,  52(4),  527–542.https://doi.org/10.1016/j. 2004.08.002
  17. Ministry   of   Finance   of   Republic   of Indonesia.  (2021).  Laporan  keuangan Pemerintah pusat tahun 2021 (Vol. 2021).
  18. Ostrom,   E.   (1994).   Rules,   games   &common-pool   resources. In   The University   of   Michigan   Press.
  19. Peraturan  Pemerintah  RI  No  11  Tahun 2023   tentang   Penangkapan   Ikan Terukur, (2023).
  20. Satria,   D.   (2015).   An   analysis   of Transaction   costs   and   governance structure  of  artisan  tuna  fisheries in  east  java,  indonesia  (issue  july). The  University  of  Adelaide  Australia.
  21. Scarpello,  F.  (2020).  Susi  versus  the  rest: The  political  economy  of  the  fisheriesIndustry    in    indonesia    during jokowi’s  first  term. Asian  Journal  of Political Science, 28(2), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2020.1774908
  22. Todorova,  T.  (2015).  The  transaction-cost Roots of market failure. RePEc Working Paper, 1–21.
  23. Torvik,    R.   (2009).    Why    do    someresource-abundant  countries  succeed while    others    do    not? Oxford Review    of  Economic  Policy,  25(2),241–256.https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grp015
  24. Williamson,  O.  E.  (1981).  The  economics Of   organization :   the   transaction cost  approach  author  (  s  ):  Oliver  E  . Williamson  Source :  The  American Journal  of  Sociology  ,  Vol  .  87  ,  No.3  (  Nov  .,  1981  ),  pp  .  548-577  . The University  of  Chicago  Press  Sta-ble . Chicago   Journals,    87(3), 548–577.  https://doi.org/10.1086/227496
  25. Williamson,  O.  E.  (1985).  The  economic Institutions   of   capitalism:   firms, Market,     relational     contracting. https://doi.org/10.2307/258544
  26. Yeager,  T.  J.  (1999).  Institutions,  transitionEconomies, and economic development. Westview Press.
  27. Yustika, A. E. (2013). Ekonomi kelembagaan: Paradigma,   teori,   dan   kebijakan. Penerbit erlangga.