The Effect of Implementing 12/14 Day Harvest Rotation on FFB Production and Harvest Employee Income: Case Study at PT Nusaina Agro Kobi Manise
Jusri Memem | Wardis Girsang | Inta PN Damanik
Discipline: counselling, psychotherapy and occupational therapy
Abstract:
The policy regarding crop rotation is relatively new. However, this policy is
still being debated, because it is not yet known that a consistent harvest rotation pattern has a significant effect on harvest premiums, FFB production and
harvest employee income at PT Nusaina Agro Kobi Manise. This research aims
to analyze the effect of 12/14 day harvest rotation and harvest premiums on
FFB production and harvest employee income. This research uses quantitative
descriptive methods. Data were analyzed using SmartPLS 3.0 Software. The
results of the research show the effect of implementing 12/14 day harvest rotation and harvest premiums on FFB production and harvest employee income. It is clear that implementing 12/14 day harvest rotation does not have
a direct influence on FFB production and harvest employee income but the
implementation of 12/14 day harvest rotation days have an indirect influence
through harvest premiums on production and harvest employee income. The
t-calculated path coefficient value of 12.140 is greater than the t-table value of
1.96 with a p-value of 0.00 which is smaller than 0.05 so that the variable implementing 12/14 day harvest rotation has a significant effect on the harvest
premium variable. The specific indirect effect value of implementing a 12/14
day harvest rotation has an effect on the harvest premium and in turn has an
effect on FFB production with a calculated t-value of 2.500 which is greater
than the t-table value of 1.96 and with a p-value of 0.013 which is smaller than
0.05 so can be said to have a significant effect.
References:
- Córdoba, D., Selfa, T., Abrams, J. B., & Sombra, D. (2018). Family farming, agribusiness and the state: Building consent around oil palm expansion in post-neoliberal Brazil. Journal of Rural Studies, 57, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.013
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: quali-tative, quantitative and mixed meth-odsqpproaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.
- Getliffe, K. (2008). Quantitative Research De-signs. Research and Development in Clini-cal Nursing Practice, 112–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470699270.ch7
- Kenalemang-Palm, L. M., & Eriksson, G. (2023). The scientifization of “green” an-ti-ageing cosmetics in online marketing: a multimodal critical discourse analysis. Soc ial Semiotics, 33(5), 1026–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1981128z
- Savitri, D. A., Herlina, H., & Novijanto, N. (2021). Financial Feasibility Analysis of Chocolate Spread with Coconut Ingredi-ents as Agroindustrial Product. Journal La Bisecoman, 2(2), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallabisecoman.v2i2.353
- Sipayung T. 2020. Industry palm in a normal era. Bogor (ID): Palm Oil Agribusiness Strategic Policy Institute.
- Sujarweni, VW 2020. Methodology Study . Pustaka Baru Press, Yogyakarta.
- Sugiyono. 2017. Research Methods Business . Edition 3, Alfabeta , Bandung.
- Tolvanen, A., Kangas, K., Tarvainen, O., Huhta, E., Jäkäläniemi, A., Kyttä, M., … Tyrväinen, L. (2020). The relationship be-tween people’s activities and values with the protection level and biodiversity. Tourism Management, 81, 104141.
- Widiastuti, I. (2018). . Sucsess of Agribisnis Atsiri Oil. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
- Zainuddin Rela, I., Firihu, M., Awang, A., Iswandi, M., Malek, J., Nikoyan, A., … Salahuddin, S. (2021). Formation of Farming Community Resilience Models for Sustainable Agricultural Development at the Mining Neighborhood in Southeast Sulawesi Indonesia. Sustainability, 13(2), 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020878.
- Zinngrebe, Y., Borasino, E., Chiputwa, B., Dobie, P., Garcia, E., Gassner, A., … Hauck, J. (2020). Agroforestry governance for operationalising the landscape approach: connecting conservation and farming ac-tors. Sustainability Science, 15(5), 1417–1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00840-8