HomeUSI Research Journalvol. 15 no. 1 (2019)

Natural Law Through Telos: The Ethical Warrant for Human Flourishing

Reynaldo-Bong R. Buhat

Discipline: Philosophy

 

Abstract:

Taking the philosophical lens of Alasdair MacIntyre’s traditionalism which integrates domestic theories as well as foreign theories into itself in a dialogical manner, may allow a more integrated theory, in this case, a broad formulation of the natural law theory. Further, this theory may incorporate the order of reason theory as well as the present context and culture that the society has been inextricably connected to, and that is the influence of technology. At the kernel of this theory which paves the way for a broad construal of natural law is the emphasis for the telos or the ultimate goal of one’s existence. The author argues that a wider and a broader concept of natural law should require the re-thinking of one’s telos. What is really the goal or purpose of human existence? Is it just to live and breathe? Or along with that breathing is the attainment of eudaimonia or the pursuit of human flourishing? The author is convinced that a renewed theory of natural law requires a serious rethinking of one’s telos. This telos is and should only be the pursuit of human flourishing and happiness.



References:

  1. Angier, T. (2011). Alasdair MacIntyre’s Analysis of Tradition. European Journal, 540-572.
  2. Aquinas, T. (1947). Summa Theologica. New York: Benzinger Bros.
  3. Aquinas, T. (2000). Dec. praec. I. In E. Joseph Ratzinger, Catechism of the Catholic Church (p. 1956). Washington DC: United States Catholic Conference.
  4. Aquinas, T. (2001-2003). Summa Contra Gentiles. (e. a. Anton C. Pegis, Trans.) Notre Dame Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
  5. Aristotle. (1984). Physics. In E. J. Barnes, The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revise Oxford Translation. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
  6. Aristotle. (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Pinceton NJ: Princeton University Press.
  7. Aristotle. (1985). Nicomachean Ethics. (T. Irwin, Trans.) Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.
  8. Brannigan, M. C. (2005). Ethics Across Cultures: An Introductory Text with Reading. New York: Mcgraw Hill Co. Inc.
  9. Cariño, J. V. (2016). Re-thinking Catholic Philosophy: Alasdair MacIntyre and the Tension within Thomism. Kritike, 191-209.
  10. Contreras, F. J. (2013). The Threas of Natural Law: Unraveling A Philosophical Tradition. New York: Springer.
  11. David, R. J. (2014, September 9). Implementing the RH Law. Philippine Daily Inquirer.
  12. Dummet, M. (2010). The Nature and Future of Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
  13. Fieser, J. (2001). Moral Philosophy through the Ages. Mountain View CA: Mayfield.
  14. Gonzales, A. M. (2008). Contemporary Perspective on Natural Law. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
  15. Graham, M. (2002). Josef Fuchs on Natural Law. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
  16. Kretzmann, N. (1993). The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Leunissen, M. (2010). Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  19. MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
  20. MacIntyre, A. (1990). Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
  21. MacIntyre, A. (1993). Aquinas on Mind. London: Routledge.
  22. MacIntyre, A. (2002). Dependent Rattional Animals. Illinois: Carus Publishing Company.
  23. Ramis-Barcelo, R. (2013). Alasdair MacIntyre on Natural Law. In E. Francisco Jose Contreras, The Threads of Natural Law: Unravelling a Philosophical Tradition (pp. 191-209). New York: Springer.
  24. Siipi, H. (2012). Is Neuroenhancement Unnatural and Does it Morally Matter? In E. James Giordano, Neurotechnology: Premises, Potential and Problems (pp. 199-212). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.