Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation⇛vol. 2 no. 1 (2024)

Ecopreneurship as an Innovative Pedagogy for Sustainable Development: An Action Research

Babita Maharjan | Netra Manandhar | Pushpa Sunar

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

Nepal has a diverse ethnic population, some of whom have indigenous knowledge. Their sociocultural knowledge has largely influenced their daily environmental sustainability practices as they highly respect Mother Nature. However, these days, in the name of modernization, people have slowly embraced Western culture and values by adding a disastrous footprint on the earth. They started to ignore the uniqueness of their indigenous knowledge, which prioritizes sustainability. Hence, this paper focuses on viewing indigenous knowledge as ecopreneurship and developing ecopreneurship as an innovative pedagogy for sustainable development. This paper applies action research to intervene in the current pedagogical practice to introduce ecopreneurship as an innovative pedagogy. The participants of this research are the teachers of grade eight of a private school from Lalitpur. This paper concludes that when students explore their indigenous knowledge, it creates an attachment to their indigenous know-how. They learn to value their ancestors’ knowledge for their contribution to ecology, sustainability, and self-dependence. Furthermore, ecopreneurship enables their learning to be authentic and meaningful through their active involvement in producing eco-friendly material, which they showcased at the fair and motivated them to think and act as ecopreneurs for sustainable development



References:

  1. Abidin, E. N., & Hariyono, E. (2020, March). Ecopreneurship-oriented project-based learning (PBL): An approach to enhance students’ problem-solving skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 149(1), 12-25. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012025
  2. Angus, D. C. (2020). Optimizing the trade-off between learning and doing in a pandemic. Jama, 323(19), 1895-1896.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4984
  3. Appannagari, R. R. (2017). Environmental pollution causes and consequences: A study. North Asian International Research Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 3(8), 151-161. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323944189_Environmental_Pollution_Causes_and_Consequences_A_Study
  4. Aryanto, S., & Syaodih, E. (2017). Development of ecopreneurship in primary school. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 3(9), 597-602. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.370428 
  5. Ball, A., Joyce, H. D., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2016). Exploring 21st century skills and learning environments for middle school youth. International Journal of School Social Work, 1(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4148/2161-4148.1012
  6. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). What is sustainable development? Our Common Future, 8(9), 1-40. https://www.latrobe.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/554927/Sustainability-Plan-2013-2017.pdf
  7. Bustami, Y., Syafruddin, D., & Afriani, R. (2018). The implementation of contextual learning to enhance biology students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 451-457.  http://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.11721
  8. Costley, K. C. (2015). Research supporting integrated curriculum: Evidence for using this method of instruction in public school classrooms. Arkansas Tech University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED552916.pdf
  9. Dewi, P. Y., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19-26. http://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26
  10. Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2018). Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st-century capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31-50.  https://doi.org/10.30777/APJER.2018.1.1.03
  11. Friedman, J., Haverkate, V., Oomen, B., Park, E., & Sklad, M. (2015). Going glocal in higher education: The theory, teaching and measurement of global citizenship. UCR University College Research.
  12. Hasruddin, M. Y. N., & Rezeqi, S. (2015). Application of contextual learning to improve critical thinking ability of students in biology teaching and learning strategies class. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 11(3), 109-116. https://hsistemhub.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Application-of-Contextual-Learning-to-Improve-Critical-Thinking-Ability-of-Students-in-Biology-Teaching-and-Learning-Strategies-Class.pdf
  13. Hays, J., Reindeers, H. (2020). Sustainable learning and education: A curriculum for the future. International Review of Education, 66, 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09820-7
  14. Ifeoma, A. R., Gunardi, A., & Chizoba, N. P. (2020). Ecopreneurship implementation and environmental sustainability in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Information System Research (IJAISR), 4(5), 1-6. http://ijeais.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/5/IJAISR200501.pdf
  15. Ifeoma, A. R., Gunardi, P. A., & Chizoba, N. P. (2020). Ecopreneurship Implementation and Environmental Sustainability in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Information Systems Research (IJAISR), 4(5), 1-6. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:250619544
  16. Jabareen, Y. (2008). A new conceptual framework for sustainable development. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10, 179-192. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9058-z
  17. Jeronen, E. (2020). Sustainable development. In Encyclopedia of sustainable management (pp. 1–7). Springer International Publishing.
  18. Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2009). Experiential learning theory: A dynamic, holistic approach to management learning, education and development. In The SAGE Handbook of management learning, education and development (pp. 42-68). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021038
  19. Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2014). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 227-247). Routledge. https://secondarycontent.pbworks.com/f/experiential-learning-theory.pdf
  20. Konst, T., & Kairisto-Mertanen, L. (2020). Developing innovation pedagogy approach. On the Horizon, 28(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-08-2019-0060
  21. Love, J. H., Roper, S., & Du, J. (2009). Innovation, ownership and profitability. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(3), 424-434. https://publications.aston.ac.uk/id/eprint/3578/1/Innovation_ownership_and_profitability.pdf
  22. Manandhar, N. K. (2022). A brickworker becomes transformative STEAM educator: Journey of resistance, advocacy, and envisioning. Journal of Transformative Praxis, 3(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v3i1.580
  23. Mannion, G. (2015). Towards glocal pedagogies: Some risks associated with education for global citizenship and how glocal pedagogies might avoid them. In J. Friedman, V. Haverkate, B. Oomen, E. Park, & M. Sklad (Eds), Going glocal in higher education: the theory, teaching and measurement of global citizenship (pp. 19-¬34). University College Roosevelt.
  24. McCarthy, M. (2010). Experiential learning theory: From theory to practice. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 8(5), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v8i5.725
  25. McNiff, J. (1995). Action research for professional development. Bournemouth.
  26. McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: Principles and practice. Routledge.
  27. Moyer, L. A. (2016). Engaging students in 21st century skills through non-formal learning [Doctoral dissertation]. Virginia Tech. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/70949/Moyer_LA_D_2016.pdf
  28. Mynbayeva, A., Sadvakassova, Z., & Akshalova, B. (2018). Pedagogy of the twenty-first century: Innovative teaching methods. In O. B. Cavero, & N. Llevot-Calvet (Eds.), New pedagogical challenges in the 21st century: Contributions of research in education (pp. 564-578). IntechOpen.
  29. Myrdal, G. (1974). What is development? Journal of Economic Issues, 8(4), 729-736. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1974.11503225
  30. Naifeld, E., & Simon, E. (2017). Teaching students’ understanding of innovative pedagogy. European Scientific Journal, 13(4), 15-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n4p15
  31. Nichols, M. (2023). Transforming conventional education through ODDE. In Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 641-657). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_35
  32. Putri, Y., Gloria, R. Y., & Mulyani, A. (2018). The effectiveness of bioentrepreneurship learning using comics on the sub concepts of angiosperms for high school students. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 7(2), 159-172.  https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v7i2.3154
  33. Rastogi, P., & Sharma, R. (2018). Ecoprenuership for sustainable development. In J. Marques (Ed.), Handbook of engaged sustainability (pp. 1-27). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53121-2_46-1 
  34. Rizhniak, R., Pasichnyk, N., Zavitrenko, D., Akbash, K., & Zavitrenko, A. (2021). The implementation of an integrative approach to learning with the use of integrated images. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(1), 281-297. 2021, https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.1/373
  35. Santos, J., Figueiredo, A. S., & Vieira, M. (2019). Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 72, 12-17. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.003
  36. Schaltegger, S. (2002). A framework for ecopreneurship: Leading bioneers and environmental managers to ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 38, 45-58. http://www.jstor.org/stable/greemanainte.38.45
  37. Suryaningsih, Y., & Aripin, I. (2022). Ecopreneurship biology learning with local resources to raise high school student entrepreneurial interest. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 1(1), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.31949/ijeir.v1i1.1864
  38. Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2017). Contextual learning: Innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance. Eurasia Journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 14(1), 61-76. http://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79329
  39. Taylor, P. C., & Taylor, L. (2019, November 2–4). Transformative STEAM education for sustainable development. Proceedings of the Science and Mathematics International Conference (SMIC), 2018. Taylor & Francis
  40. Wei, X., Ren, H., Ullah, S., Bozkurt, C. (2022). Does environmental entrepreneurship play a role in sustainable green development? Evidence from emerging Asian economies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2067887

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic