HomeInternational Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovationvol. 2 no. 2 (2024)

Implementation of the TLE-ICT Program Among Junior High Schools in District II of Quezon City in New Normal Setting

Marvin Dela Cruz

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The purpose of the study is to determines the extent of implementing the TLE-ICT program in District II of Quezon City. The TPACK domains framework is used to measure teachers' competency level in teaching TLE-ICT. Furthermore, this study employed a descriptive correlation design to produce accurate and reliable results. This research focuses on (7) junior high schools in congressional district II of Quezon City, offering TLE-ICT subjects, namely computer systems and services, computer programming, and illustrator. The researcher used Quota sampling to determine the sample populations for teacher respondents. The researcher used a questionnaire for descriptive interpretation to obtain accurate results. The frequency will determine the distribution and percentage of the respondents. Based on the gathered data, the following significant findings reveal that using summative assessments to evaluate student learning and measure their proficiency in ICT is utilized to the extent of implementation of the TLE-ICT program—the overall level of teachers' technological pedagogical content expertise in teaching ICT. The results indicate that teachers have a moderately high level of technical and pedagogical content knowledge when teaching ICT. Moreover, no significant relationship exists between the perceived Extent of TLE-ICT program implementation and demographic characteristics. After calculating Kendall, the tau-b correlation coefficient for the variables indicates no significant relationship between ICT teachers' perceived TPACK and their demographic characteristics. Lastly, there is a significant relationship between the Extent of TLE-ICT program implementation and the TPACK of ICT teachers.



References:

  1. Adreas Schleicher. (2020). “Supporting the Continuation of Teaching and Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic”. Global Education Innovation Initiative. https://globaled.gse.harvard.edu/files/geii/files/supporting-the-continuation-of-teaching-and-learning-during-the-covid-19-pandemic.pdf
  2. Alemu, B. M. (2015). Integrating ICT into Teaching-Learning Practices: Promise, Challenges and Future Directions of Higher Educational Institutes. ERIC - Education Resources Information Center. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1056082
  3. Bajpai, N., Biberman, J., & Ye, Y. (2020). ICT and COVID-19. Center for Sustainable Development. https://csd.columbia.edu/research-projects/ict-and-covid-19
  4. Basal, D. V. (2022). Intructional Competencies of Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) Teachers: Basis for Competency-Based Module. International Journal of Research Publications. https://ijrp.org/paper-detail/2901
  5. Calanog, M. C. B. (2021). Developing Technical Skills of Technology and Livelihood Education
  6. Secondary Teachers in the Province of Batangas. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 4(12), 120-132. https://journal.ijresm.com/index.php/ijresm/article/view/1632
  7. Chai, C. S., Ling Koh, J. H., & Tsai, C. (2013). A Review of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Researchgate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290044779_A_Review_of_Technological_Pedagogical_Content_Knowledge
  8. Department of Education. (2012). Guidelines on the Implementation of Strengthened Technical-Vocational Education Program (STVEP) and Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) Curriculum. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/DO_s2012_67.pdf
  9. Department of Education. (2012). DO 67, S. 2012 – Guidelines on the implementation of strengthened technical-vocational education program (STVEP) and technology and livelihood education (TLE) curriculum. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2012/07/10/do-67-s-2012-guidelines-on-the-implementation-of-strengthened-technical-vocational-education-program-stvep-and-technology-and-livelihood-education-tle-curriculum/
  10. Diaz, L. E., Caminero, G. F., Lloret, C. H., Gonzales, H. G., & Castillo, J. A. (2020). Analyzing the impact of COVID-19 on education professionals. Toward a paradigm shift: ICT and Neuroeducation as a binomial of action. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5646
  11. Elli, M. A., & Ricafort, J. D. (2020). Competencies of Grade VI Teachers in Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE). ERIC - Education Resources Information Center. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED607222.pdf
  12. Espiritu, E. V. (2020). Readiness of Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) Teachers in the Implementation of K to 12 Curriculums. IJARW | International Journals of Academic Research World. https://ijeais.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/IJAMR201108.pdf
  13. Francisco, A. S. (2020). Teachers’ Personal and Professional Demographic Characteristics as Predictors of Students’ Academic Performance in English. ERIC - Education Resources Information Center. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED608431.pdf
  14. Ghavifekr, S., Kunjappan, T., Ramasamy, L., & Anthony, A. (2018). Teaching and Learning with ICT Tools: Issues and Challenges from Teachers’ Perceptions. ERIC - Education Resources Information Center. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1096028.pdf
  15. Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, A. (2015). Teaching and Learning with Technology: Effectiveness of ICT Integration in Schools. ERIC - Education Resources Information Center. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105224.pdf
  16. Gu, X., Zhu, Y., & Guo, X. (2012). Meeting the “Digital natives? Understanding the. ProQuest | Better research, better learning, better insights. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2139172750?parentSessionId=xRvdQMv1Q1GgRQGpGa5Z%2FmgUj%2FQ%2FZNykA5%2FxPaJ%2F%2BFg%3D&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals
  17. Hart, C. (2020). Perspective | Educators are learners, too. EducationNC. https://www.ednc.org/perspective-educators-are-learners-too/
  18. Irwanto, I., Redhana, I. W., & Wahono, B. (2022). Examining perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A perspective from Indonesian pre-service teachers | Irwanto | Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. Universitas Negeri Semarang. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/32366/12827
  19. Jamani, K. J., & Figg, C. (2015). A case study of a TPACK-based approach to teacher professional Development: Teaching science with blogs – CITE journal. CITE Journal – Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. https://citejournal.org/volume-15/issue-2-15/science/a-case-study-of-a-tpack-based-approach-to-teacher-professional-developmentteaching-science-with-blogs
  20. Kadıoğlu-Akbulut, C., Çetin-Dindar, A., Küçük, S., & Acar-Şeşen, B. (2020). Development and validation of the ICT-TPACK-science scale. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 355-368.
  21. Kajal. (2023). Role of computer in education. The Asian School. https://www.theasianschool.net/blog/role-of-computer-in-education/#:~:text=Computers%20can%be%20used%20for,their%20research%20materials%20in%20computers
  22. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? BYU Open Learning Network. https://open.byu.edu/lidtfoundations/tpack?book_nav=true
  23. Koh, J. H. (2018). TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change. SpringerLink. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5
  24. Kurt, S. (2019). TPACK: Technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/technological-pedagogical-content-knowledge-tpack-framework/
  25. Llego, M. A. (2022). Most essential learning competencies (MELCS) guidelines. TeacherPH. https://www.teacherph.com/melcs-guidelines/
  26. Majid, I. (2020). ICT in Assessment: A Backbone for Teaching and Learning Process. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348489222_ICT_in_Assessment_A_Backbone_for_Teaching_and_Learning_Process
  27. McCombes, S. (2023). Descriptive research | Definition, types, methods & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research/#:~
  28. McGraw Hill Canada. (2019). What is TPACK theory and how can it be used in the classroom? | McGraw hill Canada. Textbooks | Digital Learning Solutions | McGraw Hill Canada. https://www.mheducation.ca/blog/what-is-tpack-theory-and-how-can-it-be-used-in-the-classroom/
  29. Ozudogru, M., & Ozudogru, F. (2019). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers and the effect of demographic variables. Contemporary educational technology, 10(1), 1-24.
  30. Santos, J. M., & Castro, R. D. (2021). Technological Pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST), Social Sciences & Humanities Open, Volume 3, Issue 1, ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291121000061
  31. Schools Division Office, QC. (2021). Higher quality education ensured. Quezon City Government. https://quezoncity.gov.ph/program/education-article/
  32. Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What Works and Why? Student Perceptions of "Useful" Digital Technology in University Teaching and Learning. ERIC - Education Resources Information Center. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1144058
  33. Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods: Clinical nurse specialist. LWW. https://journals.lww.com/cns-journal/Citation/2020/01000/Understanding_Descriptive_Research_%20Designs_and.4.aspx
  34. Torchia, R. (2021). CoSN2021: 3 superintendents describe the benefits of working with CTOs. Technology Solutions That Drive Education. https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2021/03/cosn2021-3-superintendents-describe-benefits-working-ctos.
  35. UNESCO. (2023). Information and communication technology (ICT) in education | UNESCO IIEP Learning Portal. UNESCO's International Institute for Educational Planning. https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/issue-briefs/improve-learning/information-and-communication-technology-ict-in-education