Boosting Literacy: Evaluating the Impact and Satisfaction of Project DARA (Daily Reading Activities)

Joewe  G. Sales,

Boosting Literacy: Evaluating the Impact and Satisfaction of Project DARA (Daily Reading Activities)

Discipline: Education

Abstract:

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of pre-reading activities, post-reading activities, and satisfaction levels across several dimensions: Program Experience, Reading Improvement, Personal Impact, and Program Feedback, as detailed in various tables. The pre-reading activity highlighted significant gender disparities and varying difficulties with word lengths across different grades. The post-reading assessment demonstrated substantial progress in reading abilities across all grade levels, affirming the program's effectiveness. The findings revealed notable gender disparities in learner distribution across all grades, with a higher number of female learners, indicating the need for tailored interventions. The post-reading assessment showed significant improvements in reading abilities, including comprehension, speed, and fluency, across all grades. Learners exhibited increased confidence, engagement, and motivation, with some even tutoring peers, underscoring the program's impact beyond technical skills. Additionally, participants reported high satisfaction levels across various aspects of the program, including organization, materials, instructor quality, and program content. They experienced increased confidence, independence, enjoyment of reading, and improved academic performance, indicating a positive personal impact. This research underscores the efficacy of the 90-day reading program in addressing foundational literacy challenges, fostering independent reading habits, and positively influencing learners' personal and academic lives. The findings emphasize the importance of tailored interventions, supportive environments, and ongoing support in enhancing reading abilities and promoting lifelong learning.

References:

Allington, R. L. (2013). What really matters when working with struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 66(7), 520-530. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1156
Ardila, A., Ostrosky-Solis, F., & Mendoza, V. U. (2000). Learning to read is much more than learning to read: A neuropsychologically based reading program. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6(7), 789-801. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135561770067706X
Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523
August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2000). Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 703-708. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.703
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Lee, E. H., & Park, M. R. (2019). A longitudinal study of improving learner’s vocabulary & satisfaction through an extensive reading program. 응용언어학, 35(4), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.17154/kjal.2019.12.35.4.131
Mason, J. R., Jaime, S. J., Roque, N., Maharaj, A., Tenenbaum, G., & Figueroa, A. (2019). The effects of an acute bout of aerobic exercise on cognitive function in older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 27(2), 256-263. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2018-0101
Miguel Ramos-Henderson, Calderón, C., & Domic-Siede, M. (2022). Education bias in typical brief cognitive tests used for the detection of dementia in elderly populations with low educational level: A critical review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859483
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Neuman, S. B., & Celano, D. (2001). Access to print in low-income and middle-income communities: An ecological study of four neighborhoods. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(1), 8-26. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.1.1
Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M²: Media in the lives of 8-to 18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
Shaywitz, S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. Knopf.
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S., & Madden, N. A. (2011). Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Educational Research Review, 6(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.002