Home⇛Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives⇛vol. 2 no. 8 (2024)

Spoken Discourse Competence of Grade 5 ESL Learners: Inputs to Teaching Speaking

Mark Joseph B. Zapanta

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Proficiency in speaking English significantly enhances professional and academic growth. Through speaking, individuals enrich their vocabulary, practice correct syntax, and develop spoken discourse competence. Consequently, many countries have prioritized English language learning to help students improve their spoken discourse skills. This descriptive study aimed to determine the spoken discourse competence of Grade 5 ESL learners and identify the factors students consider crucial in developing this competence. Additionally, the study sought to provide insights for improving the teaching of speaking skills. The findings reveal that Grade 5 ESL learners exhibit characteristics of developing English speakers, indicating that while they possess competency in spoken discourse, there is still room for improvement. Focus Group Discussions highlighted several factors instrumental in developing spoken discourse competence, including early exposure to the target language, interaction with family, school, and community, communicative situations, confidence in using English, media exposure, and English language instruction. The study recommends strengthening school programs that promote interaction and implementing teacher training programs to integrate media use in interactive lessons, thereby enhancing learners' communicative competence.



References:

  1. Albahiri, M. H., & Alhaj, A. A. M. (2020). Role of visual element in spoken English discourse: Implications for YouTube technology in EFL classrooms. The Electronic Library, 38(3), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-07-2019-0172
  2. Al Hosni, S. (2014). Https://opinion.inquirer.net/61025/castrated-mtb-mle. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 2(6), 22–30.
  3. Al-Zoubi, S. (2018). The impact of exposure to English language to language acquisition. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(4), 151–162.
  4. çakır, I. (2006). The use of video as an audio-visual material in foreign language teaching classroom. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5, 62–72.
  5. Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In E. A. Soler & M. P. S. Jordà (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 41–57). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5639-0_3
  6. Cruz, P. A. T., & Mahboob, A. (2018). Mother-tongue-based multilingual education in the Philippines. In J. Choi & S. Ollerhead (Eds.), Plurilingualism in teaching and learning (1st ed., pp. 37–53). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315392462-3
  7. Cummins, J. (1999). BICS and CALP: Clarifying the distinction. University of Toronto.
  8. De Vera, J., & De Vera, Presley. (2018). Oral communication skills in English among grade 11 humanities and social sciences (HUMSS) students. The Asian ESP Journal, 14(5), 30–52.
  9. Eghtesadi, A. R. (2017). Models of communicative competence: Implications of language teachers and teacher educators. ROSHD FLT, 31, 28–40
  10. Eisenring, Moh. A. A. (2017). The importance of teacher–student interaction in communicative language teaching (CLT). Prasasti: Journal of Linguistics, 4(1), 46–54.
  11. Jaroszek, M. (2008). Factors determining the development of discourse competence in advanced learners of English. Katowice: University of Silesia. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12128/5207
  12. Kaewchawee, P. (2013). The effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction in developing the sixth-grade students’ English ability. http://ir.swu.ac.th/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/4114/Pudsadee_K.pdf?sequence=2
  13. Kirkpatrick, A. (2012). English as an Asian lingua franca: The ‘lingua franca approach’ and implications for language education policy. Jelf, 1(1), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2012-0006
  14. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  15. Littlewood, W. (2011). Communicative language teaching: An expanding concept for a changing world. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning: Volume II (Vol. 2, pp. 541–557). UK: Routledge.
  16. Liu, D. (2015). A critical review of Krashen’s input hypothesis: Three major arguments. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(4), 139–146.
  17. Luan, N. L., & Sappathy, S. M. (2011). L2 vocabulary acquisition: The impact of negotiated interaction. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 11(2), 5–20.
  18. Malec, A., Peterson, S. S., & Elshereif, H. (2017). Assessing young children’s oral language: Recommendations for classroom practice and policy. Canadian Journal of Education, 40(3), 362–392
  19. Martin, I. P. (2015). English in mother tongue-based multilingual education in the Philippines. English for ASEAN Integration: Policies and Practices in the Region, 110–119.
  20. Meriem, M. (2015). The role of audio-visual aids in enhancing EFL students’ speaking skill: Case study first year LMD students of English at Biskra University. Mohamed Kheider University of Biskra. http://archives.univ-biskra.dz/bitstream/123456789/5830/1/Mizab%20Meriem.pdf
  21. Namanya, S. J. (2017). The effects of mother tongue-based multilingual education on the English literacy of children in Silang, Philippines. International Forum Journal, 20(2), 160–177.
  22. Namaziandost, E., & Nasri, M. (2019). A meticulous look at Long’s (1981) interaction hypothesis: Does it have any effect on speaking skill? Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 6(2), 218–230.
  23. Nguyễn, T. T. (2020). Factors affecting speaking skills in English of children.
  24. Pangket, W. (2019). Oral English proficiency: Factors affecting the learners’ development. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 2(2), 88–98.
  25. Patrick, R. (2019). Comprehensible input and Krashen’s theory. Journal of Classics Teaching, 20(39), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2058631019000060
  26. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
  27. Salvador, R. (2020). Linguistic and discourse competence of senior high school students: Basis for re-medial program in English. Universe International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 1(2), 182–189.
  28. Savignon, S. J. (2017). Communicative competence. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (1st ed., pp. 1–7). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0047
  29. Tuan, V. V. (2017). Communicative competence of the fourth year students: Basis for proposed English language program. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 104. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n7p104.
  30. Villanueva, I. M. (2019). Effects of audio-visual materials on oral discourse competence of grade five pupils. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, 9(4).

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic