Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 5 no. 6 (2024)

Senior High School Program Graduates and Teachers’ Satisfaction and Challenges: Spring Board of Plan Adjustments

Edna D. Trinidad | Bazil T. Sabacajan | Alexander Morados | Wenie L. Nahial

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The study was conducted to determine the challenges and satisfaction of the teachers and graduates on the implementation of Senior High School (SHS) Program. Out of 1615 first batch graduates of school year 2017-2018, 306 of them were used as respondents of this study. These respondents were enrolled in two colleges in the Province of Camiguin. While 91 out of 130 SHS teachers from 10 public schools in DepEd-Camiguin represented were used as sample from the SHS implementers. The study utilized the quantitative-descriptive method to answer the research questions. Frequency, mean, ANOVA and multiple regressions were used to analyse the data. The study revealed that the graduate respondents were very disappointed in schools with no laboratories and workshops. They had difficulties in demonstrating their knowledge into actual experiential learning for the tools, materials, equipment and updated audio-visual materials needed were not available, if there were, and then it is not enough. Also, students’ research activities were impeded for no internet connections and other instructional resources available for to use. On the other hand, SHS teachers needed more TGs and CGs, teaching supplies and materials, laboratories and workshops to be effective and efficient to support learning. The graduates were not satisfied on the teachers’ effectiveness and efficiency in delivering the lessons to them. The overall results revealed that there is no significant relationship between satisfactions and challenges among SHS graduates and teachers’ in SHS program implementation. This study found out the need to implement adjustment to address the challenges identified by the respondents. Various programs and activities were needed to address the shortages and needs of the Senior High School community. Moreover, the outcome of the plan adjustments is to encourage the optimistic response of the department heads, school heads, teachers and students. By so doing, improvements will be transpired.



References:

  1. Abulencia, Arthur S. (2015). “The Unraveling of K-12 Program as an Education Reform in the Philippines” in SIPATAHOENAN: South-East Asian Journal for Youth, Sports & Health Education, 1(2), pp.229-240. Bandung, Indonesia: Minda Masagi Press, APAKSI Bandung, and KEMEN-PORA RI Jakarta, ISSN 2407-7348
  2. Aguiman, J. M. E. (2018). Student’s occupa-tional interests and locality’s in-demand skills: An institutional k12 senior high school program mapping. (Fatima Col-lege of Camiguin, Mambajao, Camiguin).
  3. Allen, J. & Van der Velden, R. (2001, July 1). Educational mismatches versus skill mismatches: effects on wages, job satis-faction, and on‐the‐job search. Oxford Economic Paper, 53 (3). Retrieved from, https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/53.3.434
  4. Alonzo, R. I. (2015). Understanding the k to 12 educational reform. Philippine Social Sciences Review 67. Retrieved from http://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/k-12/
  5. Anub, C. D. (2020). Senior High School Teach-ers’ Research Competence and Satisfac-tion with Facilities and Resources. Inter-national Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS). ISSN:2707-7578. Web-site: www.ijels.one
  6. Bandura, A. (1971). Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.
  7. Beltrán, A., Hernández-Leo, D. & Ishari, A. (2023). Surviving and thriving: How changes in teaching modalities influenced student satisfaction before, during and af-ter COVID-19. Australasian Journal of Ed-ucational Technology. 72-88. 10.14742/ajet.8958.
  8. Brown M. and Ralph S., (1998). The Identifica-tion of Stress in Teachers’ In J. Dunham and V. Varma (Eds), Stress in teach-ers:past, present and future. London: Whurr.
  9. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of school psychology, 44(6), 473-490. Re-trieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
  10. Commission on Higher Education. (2017). CMO 105 s. 2017. Retrieved from http://ched.gov.ph/cmo-105-s-2017/
  11. Cushing, J. T. (1998). Philosophical Concepts in Physics. Philosophical Concepts in Phys-ics, by James T. Cushing, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  12. Daniels, H. (2005). An Introduction to Vygot-sky. New York: Routledge - Taylor and Francis Group
  13. De Guzman, A. B. (2003). The dynamics of ed-ucational reforms in the Philippine basic and higher education sectors. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(1), 39-50.
  14. Department of Education. (2018). Vision, Mission, Core Values, and Mandate. Re-trieved from http://www.deped.gov.ph/mandate
  15. Department of Education. (2018). Secretary Briones: Changes in PH education cannot wait. Retrieved from http://www.deped.gov.ph/press-releases/secretary-briones-changes-ph-education-cannot-wait
  16. Education at a Glance 2017. Education Indica-tors in Focus. How do Primary and Sec-ondary Teachers Compare? Re-trieved from www.oecd.library.org
  17. environment and background characteristics on student satisfaction and performance. College Student Journal, 37 (2), 289-309.
  18. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1): 1- 4. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  19. Gardner, H. E. (2008). Multiple intelligences: New horizons in theory and practice. New York: Basic books.
  20. Hartree, A. (2006, July 9). Malcolm Knowles’ Theory of Andragogy. A critique. inter-national journal of lifelong education, 3 (3). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137840030304
  21. Hirsch, E. (2001). Teacher Recruitment: Staff-ing Classrooms with Quality Teachers. Washington, D.C.: State Higher Education Executive Officers Association. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/k-12/
  22. Karemera, D., Reuben, L. J., Sillah, M. R. (2003). The effects of academic
  23. Malikowski, S.R., Thompson, M. E. & Theis, J. G. (2007, March 1). A model for re-search into course management systems: bridging technology and learning theory. Journal of Educational Computing Re-search, 36 (2), 149 – 173. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2190/1002-1T50-27G2-H3V7
  24. McLeod, S. A. (2011). Bandura-Social Learning Theory. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d26d/3d618859d8bc01d64e5494f4a45e9437412a.pdf
  25. Miller, L., & Hayward, R. (2006). New jobs, old occupational stereotypes: Gender and jobs in the new economy. Journal of Edu-cation and Work, 19(1), 67-93. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080500523000
  26. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Techno-logical pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Co-lumbia University: Teachers College Rec-ord. Retrieved from http://one2oneheights.pbworks.com/f/MISHRA_PUNYA.pdf
  27. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006, June). Tech-nological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge: Columbia University: Teach-ers College Record.
  28. Mojosh, A. (2018). Slovin Formula. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/58448011/Sloven-Formula
  29. Namocatcat, J. E. (2004). The implementa-tion of the basic education curriculum. (Camiguin Polytechnic State College Mambajao, Camiguin).
  30. Official Gazette, 2018. The K to 12 Basic Edu-cation Program. Retrieved from
  31. Official Gazette. (2013, May 15). Republic Act No. 10533. Retrieved from http://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
  32. Okabe, M. (2013). Where does Philippine edu-cation go?: the” K to 12” program and re-form of Philippine basic education. Japan: Institute of Developing Economies. Re-trieved from http://www.ide.go.jp/library/English/Publish/Download/Dp/pdf/425.pdf
  33. Ong, A. S. (2006). Organizational variables as determinants to the quality of education of Camiguin Polytechnic State College: Basis of Policy and Program Proposal. Camiguin Polytechnic State College. (Liceo de Cagayan University, Cagayan de Oro City).
  34. Pascual, N. T. (2014). Factors affecting high school students’ career preference: A ba-sis for career planning program: Interna-tional Journal of Sciences: Basic and Ap-plied Research (IJSBAR) Volume 16, No 1, pp 1-14.
  35. Pendon, J. M. (2023). Transitional Challenges in the Senior High School Program in Se-lected Public Secondary Schools in Rizal. Psych Educ, Document ID:P 2023 PEMJ696, doi:10.5281/zenodo.7913047, ISSN 2822-4353.
  36. Piaget, J. (2005). The Psychology of Intelli-gence. London: Routledge - Taylor and Francis Group.
  37. Porter, L. W., Lawler, E. E., & Hackman, J. R. (1996). Ways groups influence individual work effectiveness. Motivation and lead-ership at work, 346-354.
  38. Realista, M. N. (2012). Correlated to the ca-reer preference of fourth year secondary students and employment possibilities: Basis for enhancing career and guidance services. (Camiguin Polytechnic State College Mambajao, Camiguin).
  39. Rédei, G. P. (2008). Stratified random sam-ple. Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Informatics, 1887-1887. Retrieved from https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781402067532
  40. Rédei, G. P. (2008). Stratified Random Sample. Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Pro-teomics and Informatics, 1887-1887.
  41. Sabacajan, B. T. (2015). Motivation factors and morale of secondary school teachers. (Holy Name University, Tagbilaran City).
  42. Sabacajan, B. T. (2016). Schools’ readiness in the implementation of senior high school program: A basis for strategic technical assistance. (DepEd, Divi-sion of Camiguin, Mambajao, Camiguin).
  43. Tondo, J., & Detecio, M. (2021). Satisfaction of Senior High School Graduates on Senior High School Tracks: Opportunities and Challenges. Asia Pacific Higher Education Research Journal (APHERJ), 8(1). Re-trieved from https://po.pnuresearchportal.org/ejournal/index.php/apherj/article/view/1694

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic