HomeInternational Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Researchvol. 5 no. 6 (2024)

Supplementary Effect of Ensiled Ficus Fruit [Ficus nota (Blanco) Merr.] on The Growth Performance in Mallard Ducks [Anas platyrhynchos (Linnaeus), 1758]

Isagani Q. Gaviola | Manuel Gacutan Jr. | Warren D. Come | Karen Luz T. Yap

Discipline: Animal Science

 

Abstract:

A study was conducted to determine the effects of supplementing the ensiled ficus (EFF) fruit on the growth performance of mallard ducks. One hundred seventy-five (175) day old straight-run mallard ducklings were assigned with the following diets: A (control), B (5% EFF inclusion), C (10% EFF inclusion), D (15% EFF inclusion), and E (20% EFF inclusion) following Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with cage location as blocking factor. Data were run in general linear model of SAS v.9.4. TS1M8 and difference among treatments were determined using trend comparison and declared significant at ?=0.05. Results showed the ensiling can improve the chemical composition of the ficus fruits and make it favorable to mallard ducks when supplemented. The effect of supplementing EFF in mallard ducks showed a general increase in VFI with higher inclusion rate of EFF with comparable BW and WG. However, FCR was a bit higher with ducks given increasing EFF supplement. Lastly, RFCC was also lower in diets with EFF compared to the control group.



References:

  1. Adajar, R. R., & Taer, E. C. (2021). Application of foliar biofertilizers with and without NPK in cultivating white-glutinous corn. Journal of Agriculture and Applied Biology, 2(2), 105-113.
  2. Adeola, O., & Bedford, M. R. (2004). Exogenous dietary xylanase ameliorates viscosity-induced anti-nutritional effects in wheat-based diets for White Pekin ducks (Anas platyrinchos domesticus). British journal of nutrition, 92(1), 87-94.
  3. Awad, A. L., Ghonim, A. I. A., & Fattouh, M. H. A. (2014). Effect of force molting on pro-ductive performance of Sudani ducks. Egyptian Poultry Science Jour-nal, 34(4), 925-938.
  4. Bamikole, M. A., Ikhatua, U. J., Arigbede, O. M., Babayemi, O. J., & Etela, I. (2004). An Evaluation of the Acceptability as Forage of Some Nutritive and Antinutritive Com-ponents and of the Dry Matter Degrada-tion Profiles of Five Species of Ficu s. Tropical Animal Health and Produc-tion, 36, 157-167.
  5. Belete, Y., Urge, M., Ameha, N., & Beyene, G. (2016). Effects of processed sholla (Ficus sycomorus) fruits inclusion in the diet on performance, egg quality characteristics and feeding economics of lay-ers. Livestock Research for Rural Devel-opment, 2(8), 5.
  6. Butler, M. W., & McGraw, K. J. (2009). Indoor housing during development affects moult, carotenoid circulation and beak colouration of mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Avian Biology Re-search, 2(4), 203-211.
  7. Chakraborty, P., Mallik, A., Sarang, N., & Lin-gam, S. S. (2019). A review on alternative plant protein sources available for future sustainable aqua feed production. Int. J. Chem. Stud, 7(3), 1399-1404.
  8. Coufal-Majewski, S., Stanford, K., McAllister, T., Wang, Y., Blakley, B., McKinnon, J., ... & Chaves, A. V. (2017). Effects of continu-ously feeding diets containing cereal er-got alkaloids on nutrient digestibility, al-kaloid recovery in feces, and perfor-mance traits of ram lambs. Toxins, 9(12), 405.
  9. Dao Thi My Tien, D. T. M. T., Ngo Thuy Bao Tran, N. T. B. T., Bui Phan Thu Hang, B. P. T. H., & Preston, T. R. (2014). Perfor-mance of common ducks fed an ensiled mixture of banana pseudo-stem and taro (Colocasia esculenta)
  10. El Hajji, L., Azzouzi, H., Achchoub, M., Elfazazi, K., & Salmaoui, S. (2022). Ensiling charac-teristics of prickly pear (opuntia-ficus in-dica) rejects with and without molasses for animal feed. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agricul-ture, 11(4).
  11. Fasuyi, A. O., & Olumuyiwa, T. A. (2012). Eval-uating Nutritional Potential of Bio-fermented Rice Husk in. American Jour-nal of Food Technology, 7(12), 726-735.
  12. Hang, D.T. and T.R Preston, 2007. Taro leaves as a protein source for growing pigs in central vietnan. Proceeding of the ME-KARN International Conference on Matching Livestock Systems with Availa-ble Resources, November 26-27, 2007, Ha Long Bay, Vietnam.
  13. Kaur, S., Sharma, S., Dar, B. N., & Singh, B. (2012). Optimization of process for re-duction of antinutritional factors in edible cereal brans. Food science and technolo-gy international, 18(5), 445-454.
  14. Mahfuz, S., Shang, Q., & Piao, X. (2021). Phe-nolic compounds as natural feed addi-tives in poultry and swine diets: A re-view. Journal of Animal Science and Bio-technology, 12(1), 1-18.
  15. Mapatac, L. C. (2015). Antibacterial, Histo-chemical and Phytochemical Screening and Cytotoxicity Activity of Tubog, Ficus nota (Blanco) Merr Leaf and Fruit Ex-tracts. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Re-search Journal, 3(2).
  16. McDonald, P., R.A. Edwards, J.F.D. Greenhalgh and C.A. Morgan, 2002. Animal Nutrition. 6th Edn., Prentice Hall, UK., ISBN: 9780582419063, Pages: 693.
  17. Mciteka, H. (2008). Fermentation characteris-tics and nutritional value of Opuntia ficus-indica var. Fuscicaulis cladode si-lage (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State).
  18. Nawaz, H., Waheed, R., & Nawaz, M. (2020). Phytochemical composition, antioxidant potential, and medicinal significance of Ficus. Modern Fruit Industry, 1, 20.
  19. Oregon State University. (2016, April 4). Palat-ability. Forage Information System. https://forages.oregonstate.edu/regrowth/how-does-grass-regrow/animal-hab-its/palatability#:~:text=Palatability%20is%20the%20preference%20an,sugar%20content%2C%20and%20other%20factors.
  20. Papanikou, E. (2019, November 25). Glyco-sides in animal feeds as anti-nutritional factors. Feed Strategy. https://www.feedstrategy.com/blogs/feed-ingredient-insights/blog/15444674/glycosides-in-animal-feeds-as-anti-nutritional-fac-tors#:~:text=not%20always%20true.In%20animal%20nutrition%2C%20glycosides%20are%20generally%20regarded%20as%20important%20anti,microorganisms%20(bacteria%20and%20fungi).
  21. Polinag Ma. 2003. Food from the wilderness. DENR Recommends 12: 17– 18.
  22. Ridla, M., Allaily, A., Nikmah, F. K., & Ramli, N. (2015). Performance of Mojosari Alabio males ducks fed complete ration si-lage. Animal Production, 16(3), 176-182.
  23. Santiago, L. A., & Mayor, A. B. (2014). Nutri-tional composition analysis of Ficus odo-rata (Blanco) Merr.: a road to its prebiotic potential. Acta Manilana, 62, 41-46.
  24. Singh, P., Pandey, V. K., Sultan, Z., Singh, R., & Dar, A. H. (2023). Classification, benefits, and applications of various anti-nutritional factors present in edible crops. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 14, 100902.
  25. Sirisha, N., Sreenivasulu, M., Sangeeta, K., & Madhusudhana Chetty, C. (2010). Antiox-idant properties of Ficus Species - a re-view. International Journal of PharmTech Research, 2(4), 2174–2182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio .2015.12.002
  26. Tsega, L., Nurfeta, A., & Abebe, A. (2016). Ef-fect of feeding cactus (Opuntia ficus indi-ca) fruit meal as a partial replacement of maize on feed intake, growth perfor-mance and carcass characteristics of Cobb 500 broiler chickens. Ethiopian Journal of Applied Science and Technolo-gy, 7(1), 1-17.
  27. Wendeln, M. C., Runkle, J. R., & Kalko, E. K. (2000). Nutritional Values of 14 Fig Spe-cies and Bat Feeding Preferences in Pan-ama 1. Biotropica, 32(3), 489-501.
  28. Yegrem, L. (2021). Nutritional composition, antinutritional factors, and utilization trends of Ethiopian chickpea (Cicer ari-etinum L.). International journal of food science, 2021, 1-10