Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 5 no. 6 (2024)

School Heads' Leadership Practices and Administrative Psychological Attributes an the Post-Pandemic Readiness of San Pablo City Public Elementary Schools

Darius D. Ofrin

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

School Leaders in the Philippines are confronted with unexpectedly high levels of hardship. The school leaders function is expansive in scope, extremely demanding, and time-sensitive (Riley 2015). Individual psychological traits are distinct aspects of a person that shape their actions and mindset. These traits encompass one's personality, temperament, cognitive abilities, and emotional conditions. Being prepared for school is crucial as it enables teachers to enhance and build upon a child’s abilities, particularly in social interactions. However, today's challenge to achieving school readiness stems from the disruptions caused by the pandemic. This research aims to determine whether public schools in San Pablo City are equipped to handle post-pandemic classes, focusing on factors such as the adequacy of instructional materials, quality of governance and leadership, efficiency of school operations, effectiveness of teacher performance, student engagement, and the level of parental involvement. This study is anchored on Distributed leadership by Edwin Hutchins, Hutchins’ theory, a conceptual and analytical approach how the work of leadership takes place distributed leadership is basically shared management and Goal setting theory for Leadership practices which state that for goals to be motivational, they have to be specific and challenging but yet attainable (Locke and Latham, 1990, 2002). The research revealed a strong connection between the leadership practices of school administrators and the school’s preparedness in various areas. These areas include establishing clear goals and expectations, allocating resources to meet these objectives, fostering high-quality teaching, promoting professional development for teachers, and maintaining a secure and organized learning environment. The study brought out that the public schools in San Pablo City elementary are prepared for the post pandemic classes in terms of instructional adequacy, leadership and governance , school operation, teacher performance, learners interest, and parental support. Ultimately, the study identified that the leadership practices and psychological administrative traits of school heads are key indicators of how prepared public schools in the San Pablo City Division are for the "new normal" during the 2022-2023 school year. The participants in this study will include both elementary school principals and teachers from the San Pablo City Division. The elementary schools are composed of 7 district with a total School heads and teachers population of seventy-three (385). To collect the data, the researcher primarily used a self-designed online survey questionnaire.



References:

  1. Ayers, R. S. (2013). Building goal alignment in federal agencies’ performance appraisal programs. Public Personnel Manage-ment, 42(4), 495-520.
  2. Ayers, R. S. (2015). Aligning individual and or-ganizational performance: Goal align-ment in federal government agency per-formance appraisal programs. Public Personnel Management, 44(2), 169-191.
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (1994) Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  5. Battistelli, A., Galletta, M., Portoghese, I., & Vandenberghe, C. (2013). Mindsets of commitment and motivation: Interrela-tionships and contribution to work out-comes. The Journal of psycholo-gy, 147(1), 17-48.
  6. Battistelli, A., Portoghese, I., Galletta, M., & Pohl, S. (2013). Beyond the tradition: test of an integrative conceptual model on nurse turnover. International Nursing Review, 60(1), 103-111.
  7. Block, P. (1993). Stewardship: Choosing ser-vice over self-interest. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  8. Bober, M. J. (2001). School Information Sys-tems and Their Effects on School Opera-tions and Culture. Journal of research on Computing in Education, 33(5).
  9. Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the cre-ation of social capital in organiza-tions. Academy of management re-view, 27(4), 505-522.
  10. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1992). Leading and managing: Effects of context, culture, and gender. Educational administration quarterly, 28(3), 314-329.
  11. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learn-ing perspective for construct develop-ment and testing. Organizational behav-ior and human decision processes, 97(2), 117-134.
  12. Brown, M.E., & Treviño, L.K. (2006) that expect ethical leadership to be related to posi-tive
  13. Brungardt, C. (2011). The Intersection Be-tween Soft Skill Development and Leader-ship Education. Journal of Leadership Education, 10(1).
  14. Brungardt, C. (2011). The Intersection Be-tween Soft Skill Development and Leader-ship Education. Journal of Leadership Education, 10(1).
  15. Cameron, K. (2012). Positive leadership: Strat-egies for extraordinary performance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  16. Chin, J. L., & Sanchez-Hucles, J. (2007). Diversi-ty and leadership. American Psychologist, Vol 62(6), Sep 2007, 608-609
  17. Chin, J. L., & Trimble, J. E. (2014). Diversity and leadership. Sage Publications, 39-40.
  18. Chowa, G. A., Masa, R. D., & Tucker, J. (2013). The effects of parental involvement on academic performance of Ghanaian youth: Testing measurement and rela-tionships using structural equation mod-eling. Children and Youth Services Re-view, 35(12), 2020-2030.
  19. Christian, M., Purwanto, E., & Wibowo, S. (2020). Technostress creators on teach-ing performance of private universities in Jakarta during Covid-19 pandem-ic. Technology Reports of Kansai Univer-sity, 62(6), 2799-2809.
  20. Conkey, M. W., & Williams, S. H. (1991). Origi-nal narratives. Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge. University of California Press. Berkeley, 102-139.
  21. Corneo, G., & Jeanne, O. (2009). A theory of tol-erance. Journal of public econom-ics, 93(5-6), 691-702.
  22. Cunningham, W. G., & Cordeiro, P. A. (2003). Educational leadership: A prob-lem-based approach. Allyn & Ba-con/Longman Publishing, a Pearson Ed-ucation Company, 1760 Gould Street, Needham Heights, MA 02494. Web site: http://www. abacon. com.
  23. De Dreu, C. K., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of personality and social psychology, 94(5), 739.
  24. Dei, G. J. S., James, I. M., James-Wilson, S., Karumanchery, L. L., & Zine, J. (2000). Removing the margins: The challenges and possibilities of inclusive schooling. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
  25. DeMonte, J. (2013). High-quality professional development for teachers: Supporting teacher training to improve student learning. Center for American Progress.
  26. Department of Education. (2020, May 4). De-partment of Education. Retrieved January 23, 2023, from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp con-tent/uploads/2020/05/DM_s2020_050.pdf
  27. Doran, G. T. (1981). There’sa SMART way to write management’s goals and objec-tives. Management review, 70(11), 35-36.
  28. Eagly, A. H., & Chin, J. L. (2010). Diversity and leadership in a changing world. American psychologist, 65(3), 216.
  29. Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. (1987). Empathy, sympathy, and altruism: Empirical and conceptual links. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its develop-ment (pp. 292-316). New York: Cam-bridge University Press.
  30. Farmer, T. A. (2010). Overcoming Adversity: Resilience Development Strategies for Educational Leaders. Online Submission.
  31. Feshbach, N. D. (1975). Empathy in children: Some theoretical and empirical consider-ations. The Counseling Psychologist, 5 (2), 25-30.
  32. Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Dicke, A. L., & Goetz, T. (2012). Beyond quantitative decline: Conceptual shifts in adolescents’ devel-opment of interest in mathemat-ics. Developmental psychology, 48(4), 1069.
  33. Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R., Willems, P. P., & Hol-bein, M. F. D. (2005). Examining the rela-tionship between parental involvement and student motivation. Educational psy-chology review, 17(2), 99-123.
  34. Graen, G. B. (2007). Phenotype for enhancing multinational network leadership. New multinational leadership sharing LMX leadership: The series, 5, 23-42.
  35. Greany, T. (2022). Place-based governance and leadership in decentralised school systems: evidence from England. Journal of Education Policy, 37(2), 247-268.
  36. Gumapac, J. R., Aytona, E. M., & Alba, M. G. R. (2021). Parents Involvement in Accom-plishing Students Learning Tasks in the New Normal. International Journal of Re-search in Engineering, Science and Man-agement, 4(7), 367-380.
  37. Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2007). Asking the right questions about leadership: Dis-cussion and conclusions.
  38. Hall, A. T., Blass, F. R., Ferris, G. R., & Massen-gale, R. (2004). Leader reputation and accountability in organizations: Implica-tions for dysfunctional leader behav-ior. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(4), 515-536.
  39. Hallinger, P. , &Murphy, J. (1986). Instructional leadership in school contexts. In W Green-field (Ed.), Instructional leadership: Con-cepts, issues and controversies. Lexing-ton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  40. Hallinger, P., & Lee, M. (2013). Exploring prin-cipal capacity to lead reform of teaching and learning quality in Thai-land. International Journal of Education-al Development, 33(4), 305-315.
  41. Hamalik, O. (2014). Teaching and learning process. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  42. Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2006). Teacher quality. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 2, 1051-1078.
  43. Henard, F., & Leprince-Ringuet, S. (2008). The path to quality teaching in higher educa-tion. París: OCDE. Recuperado de https://www1. oecd. org/edu/imhe/44150246. pdf.
  44. Hightower, A. M., Delgado, R. C., Lloyd, S. C., Wittenstein, R., Sellers, K., & Swanson, C. B. (2011). Improving student learning by supporting quality teaching. Retrieved on, 3, 14.
  45. Holt, S., & Marques, J. (2012). Empathy in lead-ership: Appropriate or misplaced? An empirical study on a topic that is asking for attention. Journal of business eth-ics, 105(1), 95-105.
  46. Joshi, M. P., Kathuria, R., & Porth, S. J. (2003). Alignment of strategic priorities and per-formance: an integration of operations and strategic management perspec-tives. Journal of Operations Manage-ment, 21(3), 353-369.
  47. Kaplan, R. S. (1992). Measuring manufacturing performance: a new challenge for mana-gerial accounting research (pp. 284-306). Springer US.
  48. Kirkpatick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Leader-ship: do traits matter?. Academy of man-agement perspectives, 5(2), 48-60.
  49. Kock, N., Mayfield, M., Mayfield, J., Sexton, S., & De La Garza, L. M. (2019). Empathetic leadership: How leader emotional sup-port and understanding influences fol-lower performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(2), 217-236.
  50. Kohut, H. (1959). Introspection, empathy, and psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalysis Association, 7, 459- 483.
  51. Kontos, S., & Wilcox-Herzog, A. (1997). Influ-ences on children’s competence in early childhood classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12(3), 247-262.
  52. Kotter, J.P. (1996), Leading Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  53. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2002). The lead-ership challenge. San: Allyn and Bacon Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1988.63.2.527
  54. Lau, D. C., & Liden, R. C. (2008). Antecedents of coworker trust: Leaders’ blessings. Jour-nal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1130–1138.
  55. Leithwood, K. (2021). A review of evidence about equitable school leader-ship. Education Sciences, 11(8), 377.
  56. Lessard, C., & Brassard, A. (2005). Education governance in Canada: Trends and signif-icance. In The impact of educational poli-cy on the social context of teachers’ work in Canada. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educa-tional Research Association, Montréal, QC.
  57. Levina, A., McLeod, A. I., Gasparini, S. J., Ngu-yen, A., De Silva, W. M., Aitken, J. B., ... & Lay, P. A. (2015). Reactivity and specia-tion of anti-diabetic vanadium complexes in whole blood and its components: The important role of red blood cells. Inorganic Chemistry, 54(16), 7753-7766.
  58. Lewis, B. D., & Pattinasarany, D. (2009). De-termining citizen satisfaction with local public education in Indonesia: The signif-icance of actual service quality and gov-ernance conditions. Growth and Change, 40(1), 85-115.
  59. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New direc-tions in goal-setting theory. Current di-rections in psychological science, 15(5), 265-268.
  60. Looney, J. (2011). Developing High‐Quality Teachers: teacher evaluation for im-provement. European Journal of Educa-tion, 46(4), 440-455.
  61. Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Goal-setting theory of motivation. International journal of management, business, and administra-tion, 15(1), 1-6.
  62. Malone, T. W., G. Her man, M. Klein , E. O’Do nnell, K. Crowston,J. Lee, B. Pentl and, C. Dellaroca s, G. Wyner, J. Quimby, C. S. Os-born , and A. Bernstein . 1999. Tools for in ven ting organizations: Toward a han dbook o f orga nization a l processes. Management Science 45(3): 425-43.
  63. Manjale, N. B., & Abel, C. (2017). Significance and adequacy of instructional media as perceived by primary school pupils and teachers in Kinondoni District, Tanza-nia. International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, 4(6), 151-157.
  64. Manjale, Ngussa Baraka, and C. Abel. “Signifi-cance and adequacy of instructional me-dia as perceived by primary school pupils and teachers in Kinondoni District, Tan-zania.” International Journal of Educa-tional Policy Research and Review 4.6 (2017): 151-157.
  65. Martinotti, G., Nicola, M. D., Tedeschi, D., Cundari, S., & Janiri, L. (2009). Empathy ability is impaired in alcohol-dependent patients. American Journal on Addic-tions, 18(2), 157-161.
  66. McDevitt, T. M., & Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Foster-ing conceptual change about child devel-opment in prospective teachers and other college students. Child Development Per-spectives, 2(2), 85-91.
  67. McLeskey, J., Waldron, N. L., So, T. S. H., Swan-son, K., & Loveland, T. (2001). Perspec-tives of teachers toward inclusive school programs. Teacher education and special education, 24(2), 108-115.
  68. Meyer J. P., Allen N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organi-zational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.
  69. Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and moti-vation: a conceptual analysis and inte-grative model. Journal of applied psy-chology, 89(6), 991.
  70. Mora, H., Signes-Pont, M.T., Fuster-Guilló, A., & Pertegal-Felices, M.L. (2020). A collabo-rative working model for enhancing the learning process of science & engineering students. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 140-150.
  71. Mulford, B., & Silins, H. (2003). Leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes—What do we know?. Cambridge Journal of Educa-tion, 33(2), 175-195.
  72. N.Adriana, “Korelasi antara minat bela-jar bahasa Arab dengan prestasi belajar bahasa arab siswa kelas VIII MTsN Lab. UIN Yogyakarta Tahun ajaran 2015/2016,” Jounal Pendidik., vol. 86, pp. 78–84, 2016.
  73. Novitasari, D., Yuwono, T., Cahyono, Y., Asbari, M., Sajudin, M., Radita, F. R., & Asnaini, S. W. (2020). Effect of Hard Skills, Soft Skills, Organizational Learning and Innovation Capability on Indonesian Teachers’ Per-formance during Covid-19 Pandem-ic. Solid State Technology, 63(6), 2927-2952.
  74. Okendu, J. N. (2012). The impact of school ad-ministrative structure and adequate su-pervision on the improvement of instruc-tional processes. Academic Research In-ternational, 2(3), 497.
  75. Okendu, J.N.(2012). The Impact of School Ad-ministrative Structure and Adequate Su-pervision on the improvement of instruc-tional processes. Academic Research in-ternational journal 2(3): pp.497-500.
  76. Ortiz, A., & Levine, M. (2021). Operating a uni-versity counseling and school psychology training clinic in a global pandem-ic. Contemporary School Psychology, 1-15.
  77. Otto, L., & Lumapenet, H. (2022). Technologi-cal Leadership and Crisis Management Skills of the School Administrators To-wards School Development in the Special Geographical Area of MBHTE-BARMM. International Journal Of Ad-vance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education, 8(3), 3934-3937.
  78. Palis, L. M. O. (n.d.). Education in the time of a pandemic. KPMG R.G. Manabat & Co. Re-trieved December 20, 2022, from https://home.kpmg/ph/en/home/insights/2022/03/education-in-the-time-of-a-pandemic.html
  79. Patterson, J. (2001). Resilience in the Face of Adversity. School Administrator, 58(6), 18-24.
  80. Posner, B. Z., & Kouzes, J. M. (1988). Relating leadership and credibility. Psychological reports, 63(2), 527-530.
  81. Pruitt, D.G. (2007). Readiness theory and the Northern Ireland conflict. American Be-havioral Scientist, 50, 1520– 1541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207302467
  82. Pruitt, D.G. (2015b). Contributions to readiness and ripeness theories: Three peace pro-cesses. In W. Donohue & D. Druckman (Eds.), Searching for better agree-ments...and finding them: Contributions of Dean G. Pruitt (pp. 275–298). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Republic of Letters Publish-ing
  83. Rahim, H. L., Zainal Abidin, Z., Mohtar, S., & Ramli, A. (2015). The effect of entrepre-neurial leadership towards organiza-tional performance. International Aca-demic Research Journal of Business and Technology.
  84. Raney, A. A. (2017). Affective disposition theo-ry. The International Encyclopedia of media effects, 1-11.
  85. Ratelle, C. F., Simard, K., & Guay, F. (2013). University students’ subjective well-being: The role of autonomy support from parents, friends, and the romantic part-ner. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 893-910.
  86. Rhoades L., Eisenberger R., Armeli S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organiza-tion: The contribution of perceived or-ganizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825-836.
  87. Riley, P. (2018). The Australian principal oc-cupational health, safety and wellbeing
  88. Robinson, V., & Gray, E. (2019). What differ-ence does school leadership make to stu-dent outcomes?. Journal of the Royal So-ciety of New Zealand, 49(2), 171-187.
  89. Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and suffi-cient conditions of therapeutic personali-ty change. Journal of Counseling Psychol-ogy, 21, 95-103.
  90. Saleem, M. A., Bhutta, Z. M., Nauman, M., & Zahra, S. (2019). Enhancing performance and commitment through leadership and empowerment: An emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
  91. Salmi, Che Meh.1998. The Relationship be-tween Background, Attitude and Students Commitment In English Lan-guage.Masters thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia.
  92. Sardiman, A. M. (2009). Developing critical Thinking through the Teaching of Histo-ry: An Experience in INDONESIA.
  93. Savitha, S., John, M., Balakrishna, R., & Nata-raju, C. (2022). The Impact of Academic Technology on Sustainable Academic Op-erations-a Review and Conceptualiza-tion. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 16175.
  94. Savitri, E., & Sudarsyah, A. (2021, February). Transformational Leadership for Improv-ing Teacher’s Performance during the Covid-19 Pandemic. In 4th International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management (ICREAM 2020) (pp. 308-312). Atlantis Press.
  95. Scarnati, J. T. (1997). Beyond technical compe-tence: honesty and integrity. Career De-velopment International.
  96. Schiemann, W. A. (2009). Aligning perfor-mance management with organizational strategy, values, and goals. Performance management: Putting research into ac-tion, 45-87.
  97. Setyorini, I. (2020). Pandemi covid-19 dan online learning: apakah berpengaruh terhadap proses pembelajaran pada ku-rikulum 13?. Journal of Industrial Engi-neering & Management Research, 1(1b), 95-102.
  98. Shafait, Z., Khan, M. A., Sahibzada, U. F., Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z., & Popp, J. (2021). An as-sessment of students’ emotional intelli-gence, learning outcomes, and academic efficacy: A correlational study in higher education. Plos one, 16(8), e0255428.
  99. Soares, R., Santiago de Mello, M. C., & Naegele, R. (2021). Impact Assessment of an Af-firmative Action to Promote Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Respect in Brazili-an Chemistry during the COVID-19 Pan-demic. Journal of Chemical Educa-tion, 99(1), 513-518.
  100. Soriano, J., & Vargas, D. (2021). TEACHERS INVOLVEMENT IN DEVELOPING COURSE OUTLINE AND INSTRUCTIONAL MATE-RIALS FOR K-12 BASIC EDUCATION PRO-GRAM. Available at SSRN 3813254.
  101. Spillane, J. P. (2005, June). Distributed leader-ship. In The educational forum (Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 143-150). Taylor & Francis Group.
  102. Strecher, V. J., Seijts, G. H., Kok, G. J., Latham, G. P., Glasgow, R., DeVellis, B., ... & Bulger, D. W. (1995). Goal setting as a strategy for health behavior change. Health educa-tion quarterly, 22(2), 190-200.
  103. Suharsaputra, U. 2016. Kepemimpinan Inovasi Pendidikan: Mengembangkan Spirit En-terpreneurship Menuju Learning School. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
  104. Suharyanto, A., Fernanda, F., Jamaludin, J., Ho-driani, H., Wiflihani, W., Muhajir, A., & Lu-bis, Y. A. (2021, April). School Readiness in the New Normal Era of Online Teach-ing and Learning at Junior High School. In Proceedings of the International Con-ference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Sao Paulo, Bra-zil.
  105. Suparsa, I. M., Setini, M., Asih, D., & Tela-gawathi, N. L. W. S. (2021). Teacher per-formance evaluation through knowledge sharing and technology during the COVID 19 pandemic. Management survey 2017 data. Australian Catholic University.
  106. Susanto, A. (2013). Teori belajar dan pembela-jaran. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
  107. esluk, P. E., & Jacobs, R. R. (1998). Toward an integrated model of work experi-ence. Personnel psychology, 51(2), 321-355.
  108. Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organi zations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
  109. Tupas, F. P., & Linas-Laguda, M. (2020). Blend-ed Learning–An Approach in Philippine Basic Education Curriculum in New Nor-mal: A Review of. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5505-5512.
  110. Valenzuela, E., & Buenvinida, L. (2021). Man-aging School Operations and Resources in the New Normal and Performance of Public Schools in One School Division in the Philippines. IOER International Multi-disciplinary Research Journal, VOL. 3(No. 2). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7237-54992
  111. Villar, R. B., Yazon, A. D., Tan, C. S., Buenvinida, L. P., & Bandoy, M. M. (2021). School Heads’ Leadership Practices in The New Normal, Administrative Disposition, and Readiness of The Public Schools in La-guna. International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Sec-ondary School Education, 3(2), 156-170.
  112. Wielkiewicz, R. M., & Stelzner, S. P. (2007). Spe-cial issue on leadership falls be-hind. American Psychologist, 62(6), 605–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X62.6.605
  113. Williams, P. N., Islam, M. R., Adomako, E. E., Raab, A., Hossain, S. A., Zhu, Y. G., ... & Me-harg, A. A. (2006). Increase in rice grain arsenic for regions of Bangladesh irrigat-ing paddies with elevated arsenic in groundwaters. Environmental science & technology, 40(16), 4903-4908.
  114. Williams, R. (2006). Leadership for school re-form: do principal decision-making styles reflect a collaborative ap-proach?. Canadian Journal of Education-al Administration and Policy, (53).
  115. Wiranto, R., & Slameto, S. (2021). Alumni satis-faction in terms of classroom infrastruc-ture, lecturer professionalism, and cur-riculum. Heliyon, 7(6), e06679.
  116. Yaffa, C. (2003). High school principals’ mana-gerial perceptions and their tolerance of ambiguity. Available at: http://www.graduate.technion.ac.il/Theses/Abstracts.asp?Id=12776. Retrieved July 31, 2007.
  117. Yusup, N. B. & Ahmad, A. (2016). The influence of parents support and its relationship with students achievement in English ed-ucation. The Proceedings of International Conference on Education and Regional Development 2016 (ICERD 2016) (pp. 657-662). October 31 – November 1, 2016. Universitas Pendidikan, Bandung, Indonesia.
  118. Yusup, N. B., & Ahmad, A. (2016, October). The influence of parents support and its rela-tionship with students achievement in English education. In International Con-ference on Education and Regional De-velopment (pp. 657-662).
  119. Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). The nature of executive leadership: A conceptual and empirical analysis of success. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  120. Zientek, L. R. (2007). Do teachers differ by cer-tification route? Novice teachers’ sense of self-efficacy, commitment to teaching, and preparedness to teach (Doctoral dis-sertation, Texas A&M University).

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic