Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 5 no. 8 (2024)

Effects of the Technology-Enhanced Lessons in Optics (TELO) on the Academic Performance of Grade 10 Students

Marc Paul T. Calzada | Vida V. Antonio

Discipline: social sciences (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

This study investigated the effects of Technology-enhanced Lessons in Optics (TELO) on the academic performance of grade 10 students. A researcher-made Physics Achievement Test was used to measure student performance, and mean scores were utilized to describe the student’s performance in both pretests and post-tests. The study employed statistical tests, including the t-test of difference between dependent samples and the t-test of difference between means of two independent samples, to analyze the data. During the 2nd Quarter of the School Year 2022-2023, the Technologyenhanced Lessons in Optics (TELO) intervention was implemented for twenty meetings with grade 10 Science, Technology, and Engineering students. The control and experimental groups, consisting of two heterogeneous students, were randomly assigned. Pretest and post-test scores showed a significant improvement in both groups, indicating the acquisition of knowledge and skills. However, the experimental group achieved significantly higher scores in the post-test. TELO's interactive features and ICT-based instruction facilitated active learning and enhanced student performance. The study provides evidence for the effectiveness of TELO in improving the academic performance of grade 10 students, highlighting the value of interactive and ICT-based approaches grounded in constructivist principles and the SAMR model in enhancing Physics learning outcomes.



References:

  1. Adam,  W.K.  (2010).  Student  engagement  and learning  with  PhET  interactive  simula-tions. Department of Physics University of Colorado –Boulder, CO 80309, US.
  2. Ancheta, G.V. (1997). Construction and Valida-tion  of  a  Workbook  in  General  Chemistry II. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Mariano Marcos State University, Laoag City.
  3. Ancheta,    M.    U.    (2005).    Curriculum-Based Workbook II. Unpublished Master’s The-sis.  Mariano  Marcos  State  University,  La-oag City.
  4. Anderson,  R.  O  (1976).  The  Experience  of  Sci-ence:  A  New  Perspective  for  Laboratory Teaching.  New  York:   Columbia  Univer-sity-Teacher College Press.
  5. Antonio, V.V. (2015) Adoption and Use of ICT in the   Management   of   Public   Secondary Schools. Unpublished Dissertation. Mariano  Marcos  State  University,  Laoag City
  6. Batuyong,  C.  (2017).  Physics  Education Tech-nology  (PhET)  Interactive  Simulation –Based Activities in Electromagnetism. Un-published Master’s Thesis. Mariano Mar-cos  State  University –Graduate  School, Laoag City
  7. BECTA  (2003).  What  the  research  says  about ICT   and   motivation -Digital   literacy. www.ictliteracy.info/rf.pdf/Re-search_Motivation.pdf
  8. Bell, R. and Smetana, K. (2010). Computer Sim-ulations  to  Support  Science  Instruction and Learning: A critical review of the liter-ature. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500693.2011.605182
  9. Bermudez,  W.  G.  (2007).  Laboratory  Instruc-tion    for    Automotive    Electricity.    Un-published Master’s Thesis. Mariano Mar-cos  State  University –Graduate  School, Laoag City
  10. Bonifacio, A.L. (2013). Developing Information Communication  Technology  (ICT)  Curric-ulum  Standards  for  K-12  Schools  in  the Philippines. https://linc.mit.edu/linc2013/proceed-ings/Session7/Session7
  11. Bonifacio.pdfBranford,  J.D.  &  CTGV  (1990).  Anchored  In-struction.  Why  we  need  it  and  how  tech-nology  can  help  C.  Nix  &  R.  Spiro  (eds) Cognitive,    Education    and    Multimedia, Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbourns Associates
  12. Bransford,  J.  D.,  Brown,  A.  L.  &  Cocking,  R.R. (1999).  How  people  learn:  Brain,  Mind, Experiences,  and  School.  National  Acad-emy Press: Washington, DC.
  13. Bruner, J. (1973) Going Beyond the Information Given, New York, Norton.
  14. Bueno,   M.   A.   D.   (2017).   Competency-Based Teaching  Resource  Package  in  Technical Drafting.  Unpublished  Master’s  Thesis. Mariano Marcos State University –Gradu-ate School, Laoag City.
  15. Carin,  Arthur  A  &  R.  Sund.  (1980).  Teaching Through     Discovery.     Columbia     Ohio: Charles E. Mcrill Co.
  16. Combalicer,   L.F.   (2016).   Best   practices   and problems  in  the  initial implementation  of the  K+12  Curriculum  among  teachers  in Infanta,  Quezon:  Implications  to  an  Effec-tive    implementation    of    Senior    High School.  Journal  of  Education  and  Social Sciences, Vol. 4, (June). ISSN 2289-9855
  17. Coulson,  Gill,  and  Lyn  Cousin.  (2011).  Games, Ideas, and Activities for Early Years Liter-acy. Harlon England: Pearson.
  18. Darling-Hammond,  L.  (2000).  Teacher  Quality and  Student  Achievement:  A  Review  of State  Policy  Evidence.  Stanford  Univer-sity. Volume 8 Number 1 January 1, 2000, ISSN 1068-2341
  19. De  la  Cruz,  E.  V.  (2007).  Strategic  Intervention Materials   in   Ecological   Concepts.   Un-published Master’s Thesis. Mariano Mar-cos State University, Laoag City.
  20. Department  of  Education  (2013).  K  to  12  Cur-riculum Guide (Science). ///C:Us-ers/Win7/Downloads/Sci-ence%20Kto12% 20CG%203-10%20v1.0.pdf
  21. Department of Education. (2012). DepEd Order No. 31, s. 2012. http://www.deped.gov.ph
  22. Department of Education. (2013). Deped Order No. 43, s. 2013. http://www.deped.gov.ph
  23. Diculen,  L.  (2002).  Design  Development  and Summative  Evaluation  of  Computer-As-sisted  Instruction  (CAI)  on  Selected  Top-ics in High School Physics.  https://ejour-nals.ph/article.php?id=9287
  24. Dori, Lukesky and Tessier. (1995) Introduction to  Foundation  of  Education.  New  Jersey. Prentice Hall, Inc.
  25. Durban,  J.  M.  and  Catalan,  R.  B.  (2012).  Asian Journal  of  Social  Sciences  &  Humanities. Issues  and  Concerns  of  Philippine  Educa-tion Through the Years, 1(2). http://www.ajssh.leenaluna.co.jp/AJS-SHPDFs/Vol.1%282%29/AJSSH2012%281.2-08%29.pdf
  26. Español et.al (2009). Improving Students’ Per-formance and Interest in Physics Through Instructional   Models   and   Photos.      Un-published  Action  Research.  MMSU-CTE. Laoag City.
  27. Francisco, W. B. (2003).Web-based instruction on  selected  topics  in  electromagnetism. Unpublished Master’s    Thesis. Mariano  Marcos  State  University,  Gradu-ate School, Laoag City.
  28. Goldhaber  &  Anthony  (2003).  Teacher  Quality and  Student  Achievement.  Urban  Diver-sity   Series. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=gold-haber+and+anthony&id=ED477271
  29. Guzey,  S.S.  &  Roehrig,  G.  H.  (2009).  Teaching science  with  technology.  Case  studies  of science  teachers’  development  technol-ogy,  pedagogy,  and  content  knowledge. Contemporary  Issues  in  Technology  and Teacher Education. https://goo.gl/D52Bta
  30. Heinich,  R.,  et.al.  (1989).  Instructional  Media and  the  New  Technologies  of  Instruction. New   York:   MacMillan   Publishing   Com-pany.
  31. Holubova,  R.  (2008).  Effective  teaching  meth-ods –Project-based  learning  in  Physics. Vol 5. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED5049 49.pdf
  32. Ibe, Milagros D. & Ogena, Ester A. (1998). “Sci-ence   Education   in   the   Philippines:   An Overview,” Science Education in the Phil-ippines:  Challenge  for  Development.  Sci-ence Education Institute.
  33. Koehler   and   Mishra,   (2008).   Framework   of TPCK. https://goo.gl/a4M7Fh
  34. Laguilles,  E.  C.  (2001)  The  Development  of  In-structional  Media  Material:  The  Case  of the  Pasig  Catholic  College.  Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Centro Escolar Univer-sity, Graduate School, Mendiola, ManilaLocay-
  35. Locay, J. et al. (2006). A Physics Teacher Education   Program   in   the   Philippines. http://www.aps.org/units/fed/newslet-ters/spring2006/vanden berg.html\
  36. Lubis, M., Setiawan, D., Perangin-angin, R., Ari-fuddin, A., Azizan, N. (2024). Implementa-tion of the Angkola Culture-Based Experi-ential  Learning  Model  in  the  Technologi-cal  Era.  (2024).  International  Journal  of Religion, 5(11), 3765-3771. https://doi.org/10.61707/h4cmyw04
  37. Mariscal, L.  L., Albarracin, M.  R.,  Mobo,  F.  D., &  Cutillas,  A.  L. (2023). Pedagogical Com-petence  Towards  Technology-driven  In-struction   on Basic   Education.   Interna-tional  Journal  of  Multidisciplinary:    Ap-plied    Business    and        Education    Re-search.4(5), 1567–1580. doi: 10.11594/ijmaber.04.05.18
  38. McGrath.  (1984).  Input –Process –Output Model. https://pdfs.seman-ticscholar.org/56f2/43e998be2e6c73ff1015f105def0b10654f9.pdf
  39. Mendoza,  E.  T.  (1992).  Proposed  Instructional Materials for Home Economics and Liveli-hood Education IV. Unpublished Master’s Thesis.  National  Teachers  College,  Divi-sion of Graduate Studies and Research.
  40. Mistades,  V.  M.,  (2007).  Journal  of  Education and  Human  Development.  Profiling  Sec-ondary  School  Teachers’  Attitudes  To-wards Learning Physics, 1(2). http://www.scientificjournals.org/jour-nals2007/articles/1184.pdf
  41. Nolasco, D. (2011) Development and Validation of  Technology –Enhanced  Lessons  for Teaching  Selected  Topics  in  Sociology  I. Unpublished  Master’s  Thesis.  Mariano Marcos State University, Graduate School, Laoag City.
  42. Olusola,  O.  and  Rotimi,  C.  (2012).  Attitudes  of Students  toward  the  Study  of  Physics  in College  of  Education,  Ikerre,  Ekiti.  Ekiti
  43. .Orleans,  A.  V.  (2007).  Australian  Educational Researcher.  The  Conditions  of  Secondary Physics  Education  in  the  Philippines:  Re-cent  Developments  and  Remaining  Chal-lenges    for    Substantive    Improvements, 34(1). http://link.springer.com/arti-cle/10.1007%2FBF03216849#page-1
  44. Ormrod, Jeanne Ellis. (1990) Human Learnings: Principles, Theories and Educational. New York: Mc Millan Pub. Co.
  45. Paguyo, C. (1995). Development and Validation of  Resource  Book  for  Teaching  of  Asian Civilization. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Mariano  Marcos  State  University,  Gradu-ate School. Laoag City.
  46. Patricio,  O.  M.  (2001)  EthnoPhysics:  Bench-mark  for  Integration  of  Situational  and Community  Life  Activities  in  the  Physics Class.  (Technical  Paper).  Mariano  Marcos State University, Laoag City.
  47. Puentedura,  R.  (2010)  Using  the  SAMR  Model. http://elearning.tki.org.nz/Professional-learning/Teacher-inquiry/SAMR-model
  48. Ramos, R. (2013). KOMIKS for Teaching Optics. Unpublished  Master’s  Thesis.  Mariano Marcos State University, Graduate School, Laoag City.
  49. Ramos, S. (2016). Mother Tongue-Based Multi-lingual   Education   (MTB-MLE)   Strategic Intervention  Materials  in  Teaching  Phys-ics. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Mariano Marcos State University, Graduate School, Laoag City.
  50. Religioso,  Teresita  D.  (1995).  Science  and  Pro-gress:  Sourcebook  for  Science  Teachers. Quezon City: Phoenix Pub. House Inc.
  51. Schwab, K. (2015). The Global Competitiveness Report. World Economic Forum www.weforum.org/gcr.
  52. Tabago, L. C., (2011). The Effectiveness of Con-structivist  Approach-Based  Experiments in  Teaching  Selected  Physics  Concepts. http://ejournals.ph/index.php?jour-nal=IAMURE&page=article&op=viewAr-ticle&path[]=3607
  53. Tajero, Erlinda et. al. (2012). Multi-Disciplinary Teaching   Strategies.   Mandaluyong   City: National Book Store Cacho Hermanos, Inc.
  54. Thornburg, D. D. (2009). Five Challenges in Sci-ence Education. http://www.tcse-k12.org/pages/Science.pdf
  55. Tumaneng  (2010)  Culture-Based  Strategic  In-tervention Material for Teaching Selected Topics  in  Science  and  Technology  I.  Un-published Master’s Thesis. Mariano Mar-cos State University, Laoag City.
  56. Tumamao,  M  (2016)  Science  Audio-Mics  Mod-ules.  Unpublished  Master’s  Thesis. Mariano  Marcos  State  University,  Laoag City.
  57. Tutaan, R.B. (2014). Make Me Genius e-learning materials  in  teaching  Science  concepts. (Unpublished  master’s  thesis).  Mariano Marcos State University, Laoag City.
  58. Ubina,  T.  D.  (2002).  Validated  computer-simu-lated projectile motion experiment SPEX). (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Mariano Marcos State University, Laoag City.
  59. UNESCO  (2009).  Current  Challenges  in  Basic Science Education. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/im-ages/0019/001914/191425e.pdf
  60. Undag, Ma. C.B. (1996) Television Programs as Instructional  Media  Resources:  Effect  on Achievement and Attitudes in Science. Un-published Master’s Thesis. University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City
  61. UP  NISMED-DOST  SEI-DepEd,  (2010),  Science Curriculum    Framework    for    Philippine Basic Education. (in press).
  62. Vicente, J.M.  (2007) Simulated Lessons in Sem-iconductor Devices. Unpublished Master’s Thesis.  Mariano  Marcos  State  University, Laoag City.
  63. Villa,  V.  C.    (2010).  Indigenous  game-based  ac-tivities for teaching Physics. S & T Journal (Special  Issue)  ISSN  20120060.  Mariano Marcos State University Press, City of Ba-tac, Philippines.
  64. Wieman, C.E. (2001). PhET Interactive Simula-tions-University of Colorado Foundation.  https://www.cufund.org/wpcon-tent/themes/cufoundation/im-ages/brochures/UCB 12052Phet4page-brochurePRINT.pdf.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic