Home⇛Journal of Education, Management, and Development Studies⇛vol. 3 no. 3 (2023)

Effects of Audio Feedback in an Online Assessment on Students’ Academic Motivation

Jerry L. Escultura Jr. | Amniel D. Mejico

Discipline: Childhood and Youth Studies

 

Abstract:

effective single moderator of achievement enhancement. Hence, this study aimed to determine the effects of giving audio feedback in an online assessment on students’ academic motivation. The participants in this study are 49 senior high school students who have the same online assessments. A mixed-methods research design was utilized in this study. The results showed that there was no significant difference in academic motivation between the students before and after applying the audio feedback in their online assessments and were indicative of high academic motivation throughout the experiment. However, the students’ experiences revealed the following factors: (1) Student Emotional Engagement; (2) Comprehensive Understanding through Audio Feedback; (3) Students’ Receptiveness in Audio Feedback; (4) Utilization of Feedback in Improving Students’Work; and (5) Improve Students’ Motivation. Overall, even though the audio feedback doesn’t greatly affect the students’ academic motivation, it still creates a better experience in providing feedback to the students as it is used for their improvement on their online assessment. This study has broad implications in the online learning environment and creates new paths that teachers may take in giving feedback in their online assessment to make it personalized and comprehensible for the improvement of students’ work.



References:

  1. Allen, M. (Ed.). (2017). The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. SAGE.
  2. Bailey, T. H., & Phillips, L. J. (2016). The influence of motivation and adaptation on students’ subjective well-being, meaning in life, and academic performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474
  3. Balaji, M., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from media richness theory perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1).
  4. Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877
  5. Chalmers, C., MacCallum, J., Mowat, E., & Fulton, N. (2014). Audio feedback: Richer language but no measurable impact on student performance. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 8(1), 64–73.
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Tashakkori, A. (2007). Editorial: Developing publishable mixed methods manuscripts. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298644
  7. Cryer, P., & Nakumba, N. (1987). Audio-cassette tape as a means of giving feedback on written work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 12(2), 148–153.
  8. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2004). Supporting self-regulation in student-centered web-based learning environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 40–47.
  9. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  10. Dixon, S. (2009). Now I’m a person: Feedback by audio and text annotation. Conference Proceedings of the ‘A Word in Your Ear Conference,’ Sheffield Hallam University.
  11. Dogan, U. (2015). Student engagement, academic self-efficacy, and academic motivation as predictors of academic performance. The Anthropologist, 20(3), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891759
  12. Durbridge, N. (1984). Audio-cassettes. In A. Bates (Ed.), The role of technology in distance education. Croom Helm/St Martin’s Press.
  13. Gallien, T., & Oomen-Early, J. (2008). Personalized versus collective instructor feedback in the online courseroom: Does type of feedback affect student satisfaction, academic performance, and perceived connectedness with the instructor? International Journal on E-Learning, 7(3), 463–476.
  14. Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In Distributed Computing - DC.
  15. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 334–372.
  16. Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011). Beyond ‘doing time’: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 37(4), 543–560.
  17. Hattie, J. (1999). Influences on student learning. Inaugural Lecture given on August 2, 1999, 21.
  18. Ice, P., Swan, K., Diaz, S., Kupczynski, L., & Swan-Dagen, A. (2010). An analysis of students’ perceptions of the value and efficacy of instructors’ auditory and text-based feedback modalities across multiple conceptual levels. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 113–134.
  19. Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students’ sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3–25.
  20. Kelly, P., & Ryan, S. (1983). Using tutor tapes to support the distance learner. International Council for Distance Education Bulletin, 3, 19–23.
  21. King, D., McGugan, S., & Bunyan, N. (2008). Does it make a difference? Replacing text with audio feedback. Practice and Evidence of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 3(2), 145–163.
  22. Lunt, T., & Curran, J. (2010). ‘Are you listening please?’ The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(7), 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902977772
  23. Mahram, B., Saketi, P., Masoudi, A., & Mehrmohammadi, M. (2006). The role of hidden curriculum components in the scientific identity of students in a case study of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Curriculum Studies, 3(3), 3–29. https://www.sid.ir/paper/452830/fa
  24. Mayhew, E. (2017). Playback feedback: The impact of screen-captured video feedback on student satisfaction, learning, and attainment. European Political Science, 16, 179–192.
  25. Merry, S., & Orsmond, P. (2008). Students’ attitudes to and usage of academic feedback provided via audio files. Bioscience Education, 11(1), 1–11.
  26. Nortcliffe, A., & Middleton, A. (2008). A three-year case study of using audio to blend the engineer’s learning environment. Engineering Education, 3(2), 45–57.
  27. Ormrod, J. E. (2003). Educational psychology: Developing learners (4th ed., Multimedia ed.). Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  28. Parkes, M., & Fletcher, P. R. (2014). Talking the talk: Audio feedback as a tool for student assessment. EdMedia + Innovate Learning, 1606–1615.
  29. Rodway-Dyer, S., Knight, J., & Dunne, E. (2011). A case study on audio feedback with geography undergraduates. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(2), 217–231.
  30. Rotheram, B. (2007). Using an MP3 recorder to give feedback on student assignments. Educational Developments, 8(2), 7.
  31. Santrock, J. W. (2006). Educational psychology (M. Omidiyan, Trans.). Yazd University.
  32. Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. R., & Pintrich, P. R. (2012). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Pearson Higher Ed.
  33. Tus, J. (2020). Academic stress, academic motivation, and its relationship with the academic performance of the senior high school students. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 8(11), 29–37.
  34. Utvær, B. K. S., & Haugan, G. (2016). The academic motivation scale: Dimensionality, reliability, and construct validity among vocational students. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 6(2), 17–45.
  35. Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., Blais, M., Brière, N., Senécal, C., & Vallieres, E. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025
  36. Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37.

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic