Home⇛Journal of Education, Management, and Development Studies⇛vol. 3 no. 4 (2023)

Move Structure and Lexico-Grammatical Features of Master’s Thesis Abstracts in a State University

Jimmylen Zuniga-Tonio

Discipline: Linguistics

 

Abstract:

Writing abstracts requires a more disciplined style of writing, with higher demands on both form and substance. Graduate students are expected to produce scholarly outputs attuned to the rhetorical and linguistic conventions of abstract writing, acceptable to a wider academic community. Thus, this study examined the usage, distribution, and order of moves, along with the identification of selected lexico-grammatical features of 43 masters’ thesis abstracts from nine graduate programs of a state university. Using descriptive research design, following Hyland’s five-move analysis framework, findings revealed that the presentation of the introduction (I), purpose (P), method (M), product (Pr), and conclusion (C) moves in the abstracts varies across programs (Hyland, 2000). However, the I-move was found to be optional, but all four moves (P, M, Pr, C) were found to be conventional, with a semi-linear structure as P-M-Pr-C. Results further revealed that the lexico-grammatical features of thesis abstracts such as modal choice, use of verb tense and voice, and utilization of nominalization were influenced by the nature of the move type and discipline, along with the authors’ emphasis and goal in writing. Conversely, the abstract length of these abstracts was more than twice the number of words suggested by different citation systems, implying a lack of brevity. Based on these findings, the University Graduate School is encouraged to suggest specific guidelines in thesis abstract writing. Lastly, genre-based approach via explicit instruction to promote consistency in lexico-grammatical features of abstracts is highly recommended.



References:

  1. Balagtas, A. S., & Domingo, M. J. A. (2021). Genre analysis of selected graduate research abstracts. TESOL International Journal, 16(7), 74–86.
  2. Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315844992
  3. Bhatia, V. K. (1991). A genre-based approach to ESP materials. World Englishes, 10(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1991.tb00148.x
  4. Bhatia, V. K. (1997). Genre-mixing in academic introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(3), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00039-7
  5. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024
  6. Bonifacio, R. M. (2019). Genre analysis of research abstracts in Central Mindanao University. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(31), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.4310019
  7. Borlongan, A. (2017). Dissertation acknowledgements in Philippine English. Komaba Journal of English Education, 8, 15–35.
  8. Can, S., Karabacak, E., & Qin, J. (2016). Structure of moves in research article abstracts in applied linguistics. Publications, 4(3), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4030023
  9. Darabad, A. M. (2016). Move analysis of research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9379
  10. Downing, A., & Locke, P. (1992). A university course in English grammar. Prentice Hall.
  11. Dudley-Evans, T. (1987). Genre analysis and ESP: ELR Journal 1. University of Birmingham: English Language Research, 1, 27–39.
  12. Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.
  13. Ella, J. R. (2020). Characterizing the move structure of abstracts in undergraduate theses. [Manuscript in preparation].
  14. Farnia, M., & Barati, S. (2017). Writing introduction sections of research articles in applied linguistics: A cross-linguistic study of native and non-native writers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 486–494.
  15. Gerbert, M. (1970). Besonderheiten der Syntax in der technischen Fachsprache. [Book antiquarisch kaufen]. https://www.booklooker.de/B%C3%BCcher/Manfred-Gerbert+Besonderheiten-der-Syntax-in-der-technischen-Fachsprache-des-Englischen/id/A02nJHkS01ZZs
  16. Greenbaum, S., & Quirk, R. (1990). A student’s grammar of the English language. Longman.
  17. Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford University Press.
  18. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1991). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford University Press.
  19. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (1985). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (1st ed.). Routledge.
  20. Harris, M. J. (2006). Three steps to teaching abstract and critique writing. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 136–146.
  21. Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(88)90029-4
  22. Hyland, K. (1992). Genre analysis: Just another fad? ELT Journal, 46(3), 14–17.
  23. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman.
  24. Hyland, K. (2008). Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching, 41(4), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005235
  25. Inman, M. (1978). Lexical analysis of scientific and technical prose. English for Specific Purposes: Science and Technology, 242–249.
  26. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
  27. Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1975). A communicative grammar of English. Routledge.
  28. Love, A. (1993). Lexico-grammatical features of geology textbooks: Process and product revisited. English for Specific Purposes, 12(3), 197–218.
  29. Martin, J. R. (1985). Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, 1(15), 248–274.
  30. Morales, R. C. (2012). Conclusions in research articles: A Filipino-Japanese contrastive rhetoric study. Philippines ESL Journal, 8, 83–95.
  31. Ngai, S. B. C., Singh, R. G., & Koon, A. C. (2018). A discourse analysis of the macro-structure, metadiscoursal, and microdiscoursal features in the abstracts of research articles across multiple science disciplines. PLOS ONE, 13(10), e0205417. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205417
  32. Nguyen, H. (2014). The use of humour in EFL teaching: A case study of Vietnamese university teachers’ and students’ perceptions and practices. [Master's thesis, University of Canberra].
  33. Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231–250.
  34. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
  35. Ren, H., & Li, Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and master’s foreign-language theses. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 162. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n1p162
  36. Roxas, M. J. (2020). Move analysis of senior high school research abstracts in a Philippine university. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 1(2), 48–57.
  37. Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  38. Suryani, F. B., & Rismiyanto, R. (2019). Move analysis of the English bachelor thesis abstracts written by Indonesians. Prominent, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.24176/pro.v2i2.4229
  39. Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Language Studies Unit, University of Aston in Birmingham.
  40. Swales, J. (2011). Aspects of article introductions. Michigan Classics Ed. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.3985899
  41. Tseng, F. (2011). Analyses of move structure and verb tense of research article abstracts in applied linguistics. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v1n2p27

Tools


Copyright © 2024  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic