HomeInternational Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Managementvol. 3 no. 1 (2023)

Gender sensitivity in physical education classes in one state college

Ramonito N. Abesar

Discipline: social sciences (non-specific)

 

Abstract:

Gender sensitivity is a process by which individuals are made mindful of how sexual orientation plays a critical parcel in life through overseeing others. This study aims to determine gender sensitivity in a physical education class in one state college. It employs a descriptive type of research. The respondents are the Physical Education students taking up P.E.102 and P.E.224. In this study, the mean and t-test were used as statistical tools. Study shows that P.E. 102 (Rhythmic Activities) classes are female-dominated with a strong willingness to explore their talents and skills, while males have limited participation due to reservations. Moreover, P.E.224 (Team Sports) is male-dominated where males showed too much interest in ballgames, while females are reserved and less motivated. Females needed more time for training to master certain skills. Moreover, the study's results showed that there is no distinguishable difference in the degree of gender sensitivity in Physical Education Classes as perceived by the students when taken as a whole and when grouped according to sex. Therefore, it is recommended that teachers of Physical Education classes should develop a method that is the interactive type to increase gender sensitivity among students. The development of instructional intervention by the faculty and administration to increase awareness of gender issues should be encouraged as mandated.



References:

  1. Aïna Chalabaev a, Philippe Sarrazin b, Paul Fontayne a, Julie Boiché CorentinClémentGuillotindgrenoble.fr/sites/sens/files/Mediatheque/pdf/chalabaev_et_al_pse_2013.pdf, https://laboratoire-sens.ujf
  2. Bailey, R., Wellard, I., & Dismore, H. (2005). Girls’ participation in physical activities and sports: benefits, patterns, influences, and ways forward. Centre for Physical Education and Sport Research. United Kingdom: Canterbury Christ Church University College. K. for the World Health Organisation.
  3. Beasley, C. (2006). Gender and Sexuality. Critical Theories, Critical Thinkers. London.
  4. Beasley, E.K. (2006). Physical self-concept and gender: The role of frame of reference and social comparison among adolescent females.http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd07082013100829/unrestricted/Beasley.Dissertation.Revisions.pdf Feb. 11, 2015.
  5. Chalabaev, A., Sarrazin, P., Fontayne, P., Boiché, J., & Clement-Guillotin, C. (2013). The influence of sex stereotypes and gender roles on participation and performance in sport and exercise: Review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00968
  6. Chalabaev, A., Sarrazin, P., Fontayne, P., Boiché, J., & Clément-Guillotin, C. (2013). The influence of sex stereotypes and gender roles on participation and performance in sport and exercise: Review and future directions. Psychology of sport and exercise14(2), 136-144.
  7. Clément-Guillotin, C., Cambon, L., Chalabaev, A., Radel, R., Miché, S., & Fontayne, P. (2012). Social value and asymmetry of gender and sex categories in physical education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281281688_Social_Value_and_Asymmetry_of_Gender_and_Sex_Categories_in_Physical_Education
  8. CHED (2014). Gender and development handbook (1st ed.). Quezon City, Philippines.
  9. Copeland, J.R.M., McCracken, C., Dewey, M.E., Wilson, K.C.M., Doran, M., Gilmore, C., & Larkin, B. (1999). Undifferentiated dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia: Age-and gender-related incidence in Liverpool: The MRC–ALPHA Study. The British Journal of Psychiatry175(5), 433-438.
  10. Doney, K., Dahlstrom, J., Neeman, T., Carnovale, A., & Ellwood, D. (n.d.). Gender awareness in a medical curriculum: surveying final year students undertaking a Women's Health rotation. Retrieved from http://www.wchm.org.au/gender-sensitive-training-for-anu-medical-school-students.
  11. Everhart, R.B. & Pemberton, C.L.A. (2001). The institutionalization of a gender biased sport value system. WIM Network. http://www.wim-network.org/uploads/The-Institutionalization-of-a-Gender-Biased-Sport-Value-System.pdf
  12. Everhart, R.B. & Pemberton, C.L.A. (2001). The institutionalization of a gender-biased sport value system. Advancing Women in Leadership.
  13. Flintoff, A., Fitzgerald, H., & Scraton, S. (2007). Theorizing and researching difference in physical education: The challenge of intersectionality. http://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2007/fli07165.pdf
  14. Good, C. V. & Scates, D. E. (1954). Methods of research: Educational, psychological, sociological. Cambridge University Press. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=6358712
  15. Hankivsky, O., Reid, C., Cormier, R., Varcoe, C., Clark, N., Benoit, C., & Brotman, S. (2010). Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women's health research. International journal for equity in health9(1), 1-15.
  16. Hannon, J.C. & Williams, S.M. (2008). Should secondary physical education be coeducational or single-sex? Journal of physical education, recreation & dance, 79(2), 6-56.
  17. Ifegbesan, A. (2010). Gender-stereotypes belief and practices in the classroom: The Nigerian post-primary school teachers. Global Journal of Human Social Science10(4), 29-38.
  18. Jones, A. & Greer, J. (2010). You Don't Look Like an Athlete: The Effects of Feminine Appearance on Audience Perceptions of Female Athletes and Women's Sports. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 34(2), 161-180. doi: 10.1177/0193723510363852 [5]
  19. Ardalez, V. (2008). Basic concepts and methods in research (3rd ed.). Educational Publishing House.
  20. KariukI, G. (2019). Determinants of women’s involvement in coaching individual and team sports in Nairobi city county, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, KENYATTA UNIVERSITY).
  21. Kathryn Scantlebury Updated on Dec 23, 2009 Gender Bias in Teaching. http://www.education.com/reference/article/gender-bias-in-teaching/march 4,2015
  22. Lentillon-Kaestner, V. & Roure, C. (2019). Coeducational and single-sex physical education: students’ situational interest in learning tasks centered on technical skills. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy24(3), 287-300.
  23. London, B., Downey, G., Romero-Canyas, R., Rattan, A., & Tyson, D. (2012). Gender-based rejection sensitivity and academic self-silencing in women. Journal of personality and social psychology102(5), 961.
  24. Mahoney, D. J. (2012). Gender and leadership: Female ROTC cadets' perceptions of gender and military leadership. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1100&context=eps_diss
  25. McCoach, D. B. & Siegle, D. (2003). The School Attitude Assessment Survey–Revised: A new instrument to identify academically able students who underachieve. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/247728402_The_School_Attitude_Assessment_SurveyRevised_A_New_Instrument_to_Identify_Academically_Able_Students_Who_Underachieve. Jan11,2015
  26. Mouratidou, K. & Barkoukis, V. (2018). Greek Physical Education Teachers' Gender Biases in Learning and Teaching. Physical Educator75(2), 210-228.
  27. Murphy, B., Dionigi, R.A., & Litchfield, C. (2014). Physical education and female participation: a case study of teachers' perspectives and strategies. Issues in educational research24(3), 241-259
  28. Murphy, B., Dionigi, R. A., & Litchfield, C. (2014). Physical education and female participation: a case study of teachers' perspectives and strategies. Issues in educational research24(3), 241-259.
  29. Perle, J. & Waguespack, A. (2011). Gender Schema Theory. In Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development (pp. 710-712). Springer US. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_1205
  30. Padua, R. N. (2000). Elements of research and statistical models. Cagayan de Oro: MPSC Publishing House.
  31. Penney, D. (Ed.). (2002). Gender and physical education: Contemporary issues and future directions. Routledge.
  32. Penney, D. (2002). Gender and physical education: Contemporary issues and future directions. Retrieved from https://samples.sainsburysebooks.co.uk/9781134563333_sample_516578.pdf
  33. Piña-Watson, B., Lorenzo-Blanco, E. I., Dornhecker, M., Martinez, A. J., & Nagoshi, J. L. (2016). Moving away from a cultural deficit to a holistic perspective: Traditional gender role values, academic attitudes, and educational goals for Mexican descent adolescents. Journal of Counseling Psychology63(3), 307.
  34. Scott, J. (n.d.). Meeting the Diverse Needs of All Students. http://www.eduplace.com/science/profdev/articles/scott.html
  35. Salter, G. (1989). Tasmania 2002. De-colonizing pedagogical processes in mainstream physical education: Fore-grounding culture in teaching and learning. https://secure.ausport.gov.au/__.../Decolonizing_pedagogical_processes...
  36. Seymour, H., Reid, G., & Bloom, G. A. (2009). Friendship in inclusive physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 26(2), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.26.2.201
  37. Salter, G. (2009). De-colonizing pedagogical processes in mainstream physical education: Fore-grounding culture in teaching and learning
  38. Scantlebury, K., Baker, D., Sugi, A., Yoshida, A., & Uysal, S. (2007). Avoiding the issue of gender in Japanese science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education5(3), 415-438.
  39. Seymour, H., Reid, G., & Bloom, G. A. (2009). Friendship in inclusive physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly26(3), 201-219.
  40. Vizcarra, Florante O, EdD. (2003). Introduction to Educational Research. Great Books Trading: Quezon City.
  41. Wilhelmsen, T. (2012). Physical activity in the everyday life of children: Exploring how the intergenerational transfer of habitus frames boys’ and girls' opportunity to generate and negotiate physical activity within their everyday life. Retrieved from http://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/268481?show=full
  42. Wilhelmsen, T. (2012). Physical activity in the everyday life of children: Exploring how intergenerational transfer of habitus frame boys and girls' opportunity to generate and negotiate physical activity within their everyday life [Master's thesis, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap og teknologiledelse, Institutt for sosiologi og statsvitenskap].
  43. World Health Organization. (2005). Girls’ participation in physical activities and sports: Benefits, patterns, influences, and ways forward. http://www.paha.org.uk/Resource/girls-participation-in-physical-activities-and-sports-benefits-patterns-influences-and-ways-forward
  44. Women's Health Victoria. (2010). Women and Physical Activity, Gender Impact Assessment. http://whv.org.au/static/files/assets/a3b15e42/GIA_12_Physical_Activity.pdf.
  45. Yungblut, H.E., Schinke, R.J., & McGannon, K.R. (2012). Views of adolescent female youth on physical activity during early adolescence. Journal of sports science & medicine11(1), 39.