Student Satisfaction with Frontline Services at a Philippine State University

Joel  T. Ubat,; Guadiosa  U. Villalon,

Student Satisfaction with Frontline Services at a Philippine State University

Discipline: Education

Abstract:

This study investigated student satisfaction with the frontline services provided by a Philippine state university, including canteen, academic advising, counseling, library services, registration process, and campus facilities. The goal is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of these services from the student's perspective and provide insights for improvement. A quantitative approach was employed, using a survey questionnaire as the primary data collection tool. The findings reveal that students are generally highly satisfied with the frontline services. The Security Management Office and Student Affairs Office received the highest average weighted mean of 4.44, indicating strong satisfaction. Conversely, the Campus Canteen received the lowest average weighted mean of 4.32, suggesting comparatively lower satisfaction. Respondents also provided suggestions for improvement, such as increasing space for accommodations and waiting areas. This study contributes to understanding students' perceptions and experiences with frontline services at the state university. By identifying areas of strength and weakness, the results can guide the administration and relevant departments in enhancing service quality, thereby improving overall student satisfaction. Additionally, the study serves as a baseline for future research and provides a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of implemented improvements.

References:

Adeniran, P. (2011). User satisfaction with academic libraries services: Academic staff and students perspectives. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(10), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLIS11.045
Arokiasamy, A.R.A., & Abdullah, A.G. (2012). Service quality and students' satisfaction at higher learning institutions: A case study of Malaysian University competitiveness. International Journal of Management and Strategy, 3(5), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5171/2011.855931
Bellamy, R. (2019). The republican core of the Case for Judicial Review: A Reply to Tom Hickey: Why Political Constitutionalism Requires Equality of Power and Weak Review, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(1), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz012
Bratton, T., Lytle, R., & Hudson, H.K. (2020). Follow Me: An Investigation into the relationship between Social Media behaviors and online harassment among adolescents. International Journal Arts Humanities, 1(1), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.25082/IJAH.2020.01.005
Elliott, K.M., & Healy, M.A. (2001). Key Factors Influencing Student Satisfaction Related to Recruitment and Retention. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v10n04_01
Farahmandian, S., Minavand, H., & Afshardost, M. (2013). Perceived Service Quality and Student Satisfaction in Higher Education. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 12, 65-74. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-1246574
Johnson, M., & Smith, K. (2021). Traditional Education in the Digital Age: Perceptions of Educators. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 152-168. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2023-0031
Pascarella, E. T., Pierson, C. T., Wolniak, G. C., & Terenzini, P. T. (2004). First-Generation College Students: Additional Evidence on College Experiences and Outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11772256
Smith, J., & Johnson, R. (2018). Traditional versus Alternative Education: A Comparative Study of Student Outcomes. Journal of Educational Research, 42(3), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2023-0031
St Leger, L. & Young, I. (2009) Creating the document ‘Promoting health in schools: from evidence to action’. Global Health Promotion, 16(4), 69-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975909348138