Exploring Chemical Literacy of Grade 11 Senior High School STEM Students of University of Cabuyao, S.Y. 2022-2023
Jonard A. Navarez
Discipline: Education
Abstract:
Chemistry is one of the specialized subjects in the Academic Track - Science,
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics strand. It aims at developing scientific
literacy among learners that will prepare them to be informed and active citizens
capable of making judgments and decisions regarding the application of scientific
knowledge that has impacts on their social, health, and environmental aspects. The
respondents are Grade 11 because the researcher conducted this research at the
end of 2nd semester of their Grade 11 in which they had already completed the
Chemistry Course. The goal of this study was to assess the chemical literacy of G11
STEM students at the University of Cabuyao for the school year 2022-2023. It also
determined the weaknesses of the students in the different domains of chemical
literacy: nominal, functional, conceptual, and multidimensional.
This study used a quantitative method as the research design. Data were collected
using a questionnaire developed by Shwartz, Ben-Zvi, and Hofstein (2005). The
result for nominal literacy showed that the participants have moderately high
familiarity with all the chemical terms commonly used in general chemistry
subjects. On the other hand, the participants’ functional, conceptual, and
multidimensional literacy were limited as their responses were interpreted as
partially correct answers. The recommendation was deduced based on the result
to serve as the basis for improvement, particularly teaching instructions and
content of General Chemistry 1. As such, there is a need to provide a longer period
in laboratory and experimental activities. The recommendation for educators,
administrators, Senior High School Teachers, and STEM faculty is to collaborate and
provide a standardized process for the revision of the curriculum to be
implemented during classroom instruction. Revision of the curriculum and
improvement in classroom instruction and assessment, should also be monitored.
References:
- Al-Momani, F. N. (2016). Assessing the Development of Scientific Literacy Among Undergraduates College of Education. Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2), 199. http://doi:10.5296/jse.v6i2.9405
- Alumaga, M.J.B. (2008). Factors Affecting Chemical Literacy and Achievement of High School. Master’s Thesis. University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City
- American Chemical Society. (2012). Green Chemistry & Sustainability – American Chemical Society. Retrieved June 2, 2022, from https://www.acs.org/gci
- Cardwell, V. B. (2005). Literacy: what level for food, land, natural resources, and environment? Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 34(1), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.2134/jnrlse.2005.0112
- Celik, S. (2013). Chemical Literacy Levels of Science and Mathematics teacher candidates. the Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n1.5
- Cigdemoglu, C., & Geban, O. (2015). Improving students’ chemical literacy levels on thermochemical and thermodynamics concepts through a context-based approach. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00007f
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches 4 edition. SAGE Publication Incorporated, 4. https://library.umw.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=1755&keywords=
- Department of Education (nd). Curriculum Guide of General Chemistry 1 and 2. Retrieved from http://www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2019/01/General-Chemistry-1-and-1.pdf
- Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS): measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
- Hayati, M. N. (2017). The use of science literacy taxonomy to measure chemistry literacy of the Science teacher candidates. Unnes Science Education Journal, 6(1). https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/usej/article/view/13837
- McLeod, S. (2023, September 24). Piaget’s Theory and Stages of Cognitive Development. Simply Psychology. Retrieved June 9, 2023, from https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html
- McMillen, C. M., Graves-Demario, A., & Kieliszek, D. (2018). Tackling Literacy: A collaborative approach to developing materials, for assessing science literacy skills in content classrooms through a STEM perspective. The Language and Literacy Spectrum, 28(1), 2. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1186126.pdf
- Ogunkola, B. J. (2013). Scientific literacy: Conceptual overview, importance a strategies for improvement. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(1), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n1p265
- Prastiwi, M. N. B., & Laksono, E. W. (2018). The ability of analytical thinking and chemistry literacy in high school students learning. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1097, 012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012061
- Rodrigues, S., Taylor, N., Cameron, M., Syme-Smith, L., & Fortuna, C. (2010). Questioning Chemistry: The role of level, familiarity, language and taxonomy. Science Education International, 21(1), 31-42. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ890660.pdf
- Rosa, G. C., Cari, C., Aminah, N. S., & Handhika, J. (2018). Students’ understanding level and scientific literacy competencies related to momentum and impulse. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012019
- Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). Chemical literacy: What does this mean to scientists and school teachers? Journal of Chemical Education, 83(10), 1557. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p1557
- University of Pretoria. (n.d.). An analysis of scientific literacy levels of traditional science curriculum students. UPSpace Home. https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/30264/05chapter5.pdf?sequence=6.
- Witte, D., & Beers, K. (2003). Testing of chemical literacy. Chemical Education International 4, 4(1), 1-15. https://publications.iupac.org/cei/vol4/0401x0an3.pdf