Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 17 no. 1 (2024)

Classcraft as A Gamified Intervention Tool for Students’ Affective and Mastery Level in Learning General Biology 2

Perry Angelo Manlapaz

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This research study focused on the utilization of Classcraft as an intervention tool in General Biology 2 to enhance students' affective constructs (motivation, engagement, and preparedness) and mastery levels. The study identified the least-mastered competencies in Grade 11 students and examine the impact of the gamified intervention tool on their learning experiences. A quasi-experimental approach was employed, comparing the results of an experimental group that used the Classcraft tool with a control group. Data was collected through pre- and post-tests, affective component surveys, and an assessment form. The findings revealed challenging topics in General Biology 2 and the difficulties students face in mastering them. Recommendations include tailored instruction, reinforcement exercises, visual aids, and practical experiences to address these challenges. The study shows that students recognize the importance of General Biology 2 but exhibit lower interest in further exploration. Student strategies include note-taking, creating visual aids, and seeking help. The Classcraft intervention tool, implemented for one month, leads to increased interaction, engagement, and enjoyment. Specific activities like Eons of Existence and Roundrock Rumble have a significant impact on understanding evolution and motivation. The intervention tool positively affects affective components and competence levels, improving motivation, engagement, and mastery. The experimental group demonstrates significantly higher improvement in mastery levels compared to the control group. The integration of gamified intervention tools like Classcraft has the potential to enhance affective experiences, motivation, engagement, and learning outcomes. The study recommends implementing the Classcraft tool, providing training and support, tailoring instruction, fostering collaboration, providing additional resources and feedback, evaluating and refining the intervention, and conducting further research.



References:

  1. Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2019). The effect of using Classcraft on student engagement and learning in primary and secondary education: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2073-2091.Classcraft Studios Inc. (2021). What is Classcraft? Retrieved from https://www.classcraft.com/about/
  2. Almasri, F., Hewapathirana, G. I., Ghaddar, F., Lee, N., & Ibrahim, B. (2021, May 14). Measuring attitudes towards biology major and non-major: Effect of students’ gender, group composition, and learning environment. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251453
  3. Alvarez, J., & Michaud, L. (2018). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 435-452
  4. Anderson, C. L., Allen, D., Davis, L. E., & Nickerson, Z. L. (2017). Incorporating ecogeomorphic feedbacks to better understand resiliency in streams: A review and directions forward. Geomorphology, 305, 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.07.016
  5. Ardales, P., Poral, E., & Penaflorida, M. F. (2021). Gamification in education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 14(1), 1-22.
  6. Bauer, T., & Mulder, M. (2007). Learning tool. In The encyclopedia of pedagogy and informal education. Retrieved from https://infed.org/mobi/learning-tools/
  7. Bloom, B. S. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longman.
  8. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academies Press.
  9. Brownell, S. E., Freeman, S., Wenderoth, M. P., Crowe, A. J., & Robinson, A. (2014). Teaching scientific thinking skills: A comparative study of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 209-221.
  10. Buchanan, S. M. C., Harlan, M. A., Bruce, C. S., & Edwards, S. L. (2016). Inquiry Based Learning Models, Information Literacy, and Student Engagement: A literature review. School Libraries Worldwide, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.29173/slw6914
  11. Cabral, R. C., Espiritu, R. B., & Pasiliao, L. E. (2019). Gamification of learning in Philippine basic education: Perceived benefits and challenges. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 12(1), 1-12.
  12. Classcraft. (n.d.). Classcraft: Make learning an adventure. Retrieved from https://www.classcraft.com/
  13. Deter-ding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, 9-15.
  14. Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75-88.
  15. Domingo, J. L., & Abad, M. V. (2018). Gamification of higher education: A review of literature. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), 99-105.
  16. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
  17. Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. J. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
  18. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., &Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.
  19. Glover, I. (2013). Play as you learn: Gamification as a technique for motivating learners. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 24(1), 1-10.
  20. Hainey, T., Connolly, T., Boyle, E., Wilson, S., & Razak, A. (2016). The effectiveness of gamification in education: A meta-analysis of empirical studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 243-258.
  21. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? — A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025-3034). IEEE.
  22. Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152-161.
  23. Huang, Y. H., & Lin, J. C. (2020). Enhancing student engagement and academic performance with gamification: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(5), 117-130.
  24. Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons.
  25. Kapp, K. M., Blair, L., Mesch, R., & Associates. (2014). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Kappelman, N., Stoll, R., & Kappelman, L. (2014). The impact of gamification on student motivation and learning outcomes in higher education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(3), 233-245.
  27. Landers, R. N., & Callan, R. C. (2011). Casual social games as serious games: The psychology of gamification in undergraduate education and employee training. In Serious games and virtual worlds in education, professional development, and healthcare (pp. 232-253). IGI Global.
  28. Leone, A., Voegeli, D., Landry, G., & Whitley, K. N. (2017). Classcraft as a tool for improving student engagement and learning in high school biology classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 37-48.
  29. Liu, J., Wu, H., Lu, J., & Li, J. (2020). The mediating effect of science self-efficacy on the relationship between science anxiety and science achievement in high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 42(2), 185-202.
  30. Liu, S., Chen, L., Sun, J., & Luo, L. (2021). Student motivation and science achievement: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 330-354. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21634
  31. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., & Pratt, J. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5-7.
  33. Ministry of Education. (2018). The Education Act. Retrieved from https://education.govt.nz/legislation/legislation-reviews/education-act-1989-review/education-act-1989-consultation/
  34. Moreno-Ger, P., Torrente, J., Parra, D., & Fernandez-Manjon, B. (2012). Using a gamified learning analytics dashboard for supporting self-regulated learning in teacher training. Computers & Education, 63, 204-216.
  35. National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
  36. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
  37. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
  38. Sailer, J., Hense, F. S., Mandl, D., & Klevers, J. (2017). Gamification in learning and education: Enjoyment or engagement? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 416-427.
  39. Severo, M., Oliveira, T., & Bacao, F. (2019). Gamification in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.
  40. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581.
  41. Smith, N., Quested, E., Appleton, P. R., & Duda, J. L. (2017). Observing the coach-created motivational environment across training and competition in youth sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 35(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1159714
  42. Subhash, S., & Cudney, E. A. (2018). Gamified learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.028
  43. Tondello, J. B., Moraes, R., Bittencourt, L. N., & Antonioli, G. D. (2019). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(3), 1-20.
  44. Viloria, D. D., Caballero, R. A., & Fandila, R. D. (2021). Gamifying a college course: The impact of game elements on students' motivation and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 14(1), 41-54.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic