HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 17 no. 7 (2024)

Lived Experiences of English Teachers in Teaching Literature Under New Normal

Myrna Sacasan | Dan O. Gomez

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study deeply examines the lived experiences of English teachers in teaching literature under new normal. It aims to unveil and identify common responses from the participants’ experiences, coping mechanisms and gained insights on aforementioned phenomenon. The participants of the study are Senior High School English teachers both came from public and private institutions in the province of Davao de Oro who were able to teach literature subjects during the phenomenon irrespective of major of specialization. This qualitative study used phenomenological design with seven (7) participants from in-depth interview and another seven (7) participants from focus group discussion. There are fifteen (15) themes interpreted according to the notion of transactional distance theory. During pandemic, English teachers confronts challenges in teaching the subject such difficulty in instructing literary interpretation, unresponsive students in accomplishing literary tasks, inability of the students to contextualize literary interpretation, however, the participants also considered the pandemic period helpful towards discovery of teaching strategies such as utilization of media in facilitating literary assessment whether it is authentic, collaborative, or written-based activities. The result of the study reveals that physical separation has brought gap to interaction yet helps broaden opportunity of English teachers to discover the advantage of technology in reaching out students amidst pandemic.



References:

  1. Asiegbu., F. & Okpala, J. (2019). Teacher Resourcefulness as a Key to Improving the use of Instructional Materials in Teaching and Learning of Mathematics in Primary Schools in Anambra State. Multidisciplinary Journal of Education, Research and Development 3(1) 249-252 
  2. Bonyadi, A. (2019). Failing a course: A diary case study of an Iranian EFL student. The Journal of Asia TEFL, p.2
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Chen, Y.-J. “Dimensions of transactional distance in the world wide web learning environment: a factor analysis.” Br J Educ Technol. 32, 459–470, (2001), doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00213
  5. Fakomogbon, M. & Bolaji, H. (2017). “Effects of Collaborative Learning Styles on Performance of Students in an Ubiquitous Collaborative Mobile Learning Environment” Contemporary Educational Technology. 268-279
  6. Ilker Etikan., Sulaiman Abubakar Musa., Rukayya Sunusi Alkassim. “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics. Vol. 5, No. 1, 2016, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  7. Lobe, B., Morgan, D., and Hoffman, K. A. “Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing.” International journal of qualitative methods (2020) p.19, 1609406920937875.
  8. Lokanath Mishra, “Focus Group Discussion in Qualitative Research” TechnoLEARN Vol. 6 June 2016: No. 1: p. 1-5
  9. Michael G. Moore., and Keegan, D. “Theoretical Principles of Distance Education” (1997) Routledge, pp. 22-38. 
  10. Michael Williams., Thomas Edison and Tami Moser., “The Art of Coding and Thematic Exploration in Qualitative Research.” International Management Review Vol. 15 No. 1 (2019): 45-55
  11. Stahl, N., & King, J. (2020) “Expanding Approaches for Research: Understanding and Using Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research,” Journal of Developmental Education, p.26-28
  12. Tanti Sukmahidayanti. “The Utilization of Instructional Media in Teaching English to Young Learners” Journal of English and Education 2015, 3(2) p. 90-100
  13. Tümen-Akyıldız, S., & Ahmed, K.H. “An overview of qualitative research and focus group discussion” Journal of Academic Research in Education, 7(1). (2021)., pp. 1-15. DOI: 10.17985/ijare.866762