Home⇛World Education Connect Multidisciplinary E-Publication⇛vol. 4 no. 7 (2024)

The Science Pyramid: An Innovative Strategic Intervention Material In Physics 8

Eduardo B. Ma Jr. | Rita E. Pulmano

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study developed and validated The Science Pyramid or The SciePy, an innovative strategic intervention material in least learned competencies in Physics 8. The researcher used the ADDIE model and the Department of Education’s LRMDS Evaluation Tool on Manipulative content, manipulative designs, and error-free factors, which were evaluated by six experts in science education. Thirty-one student-participants, who needed intervention, utilized it during learning sessions and validated its effectiveness based on their pre-test and post-test results. The findings revealed that The SciePy passed all factors, specifically 38.83 out of 40.00 in content, 16.00 out of 16.00 in error-free issues, and 23.83 out of 24.00 in manipulative designs. Therefore, it was found valid and recommended by validators to be utilized for learning sessions. Eventually, the paired t-test results showed that there was a significant difference in the participants’ scores with a significant p-value of <0.001. Thus, there was a remarkable improvement in the participants’ scores using The SciePy.



References:

  1. Ahea, M. A. B., Ahea, R. K., & Rahman, I. (2016). The Value and Effectiveness of Feedback in Improving Students’ Learning and Professionalizing Teaching in Higher Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(16)
  2. Alair, G. P. (2020). Strategic Intervention Materials: Their Effects on the Academic Performance in Science of the Grade-8 Students of Bai Saripinang National High School. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science, 6(12)
  3. Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE Model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6)
  4. Amarin, N. & Al-saleh, A. (2020). The Effect of Color Use in Designing Instructional Aids on Learners’ Academic Performance. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(2) 42-50.
  5. Arevalo, C. M. E., Janer, S. S., & Ricafort, J. D. (2023). Development of Contextualized Strategic Intervention Materials for Grade-8 Physics. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 4(07) 114-118
  6. Arpilleda, A. J. (2021). Strategic intervention material: A tool in enhancing grade nine students’ mathematical performance. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 10(5). DOI: 10.5861/ijrse.2021.5051
  7. Asma, H. & Dallel, S. (2020). Cognitive Load Theory and its Relation to Instructional Design: Perspectives of Some Algerian University Teachers. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11(4) 110-127. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.8
  8. Ban, J. C., Kim, S. & Shin, M. (2022) Supporting Lagging Students and Learning for All: Applying the Diagnose-and-Supplement System of Basic Skills in the Republic of Korea. Asian Development Bank. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/SPR210528
  9. Bartle, E. (2015). Experiential Learning: An Overview. Institute for Teaching and Learning Innovation. The University of Queensland, Australia.
  10. Bernardo, A. B. I., Ordel II, M. O., Calleja, M. O., Teves, J. M. M., Yap, S. A., & Chua, U. C. (2023). Profiling low-proficiency science students in the Philippines using machine learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10:192. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01705-y
  11. Bulaun, C. M. P. (2023). Development and Validation of an Interactive e-Book in Physics 9. 23. Tarlac State University
  12. Bundang, M. & Parangat, K. B. (2022). Teacher-Made Strategic Intervention Materials for Students with Learning Difficulties in Mathematics 8 in the Philippines. Universe International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 10(2). https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/04.202225185368/UIJIR
  13. Contreras, S. J. (2018). Utilization of Manipulative and Interactive Strategic Intervention Material (MI-SIM) in Chemistry 9. Asian Society of Teachers for Research, Inc. Research Journal, 2(0)
  14. Dacumos, L. P. N. (2016) Perspective of Secondary Teachers in the Utilization of Science Strategic Intervention Material (SIM) in Increasing Learning Proficiency of Students in Science Education. AsTEN Journal of Teacher Education, 1(2)
  15. Dandan, K. B. V. (2022). E-SIM (Electronic Strategic Intervention Material) in Science 9: An Aid to Improve Online Learning Performance. International Journal of Research Publications, 103(1) p. 288-298 doi.org/10.47119/IJRPQ01031620223428
  16. Department of Education (2005). DepEd Memorandum No. 117 s. 2005 Training Workshop on Strategic Interventions for Successful Learning
  17. Department of Education (2015). DepEd Order No. 8 s. 2015 Policy Guidelines on Classroom Assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program
  18. Department of Education (2016). Kto12 Curriculum Guide Science https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Science CG_with-tagged-sciequipment_revised.pdf
  19. Department of Education (2019). DepEd Order No. 021 s. 2019: Policy Guidelines on the Kto12 Basic Education Program
  20. Department of Education (2023). DepEd Memorandum No. 013 s. 2023 Adoption of the National Learning Recovery Program in the Department of Education
  21. Department of Education (2023). DepEd Memorandum No. 054 s. 2023 Pilot Implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum
  22. Department of Education (2023). MATATAG Curriculum Science 3-10
  23. Dumape, J. L. (2022). Utilization of Strategic Intervention Material (SIM) In Teaching Grammar among Grade 10 Students. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention 9(08), 7113-7125. DOI: 10.18535/ijsshi/v9i08.01
  24. Gabucan, J. R. & Sanchez, J. M. P. (2021). Strategic intervention material (SIM)-based instruction in teaching global warming in 9th-grade science. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 11(1): 15-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v11i1.6448
  25. Golder, J. (2018). Constructivism: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(3)
  26. Gustiani, S. (2019). Research & Development (R&D) Method as a Model Design in Educational Research and Its Alternatives. Holistics Journal, 11(2)
  27. Hulipas, R. B. (2019) Development and Validation of Modular Strategic Intervention Material in Teaching Physics, 42, 46-47, Tarlac State University
  28. International Association for the Evaluation of Education Achievement (2019). TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science
  29. Ismail, M. R. (2022). The Impact of the Academic Overload on Students’ Well Being Secondary Schools In South Lebanon. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science, 2(2) 181-212.
  30. Iwuanyanwu, P. N. (2019). What We Teach in Science, and What Learners Learn: A Gap that Needs Bridging. Pedagogical Research, 4(2), em0032. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/5780
  31. Khalil, M. K. & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. The American Physiological Society. doi:10.1152/advan.00138.2015.
  32. Kirk, J. (2015). Using Manipulatives in the Chemistry Classroom as a Tool to Increase the Understanding and Knowledge of the Law of Conservation of Matter. Education Masters. Paper 305
  33. Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press,79
  34. Lee, S. M. (2018). Innovation: from small “i” to large “I.” International Journal of Quality Innovation, 8(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40887-018-0022-4
  35. Luzano, J. F. P. (2020). Development and Validation of Strategic Intervention Materials (SIMs) of the Selected Topics in Trigonometry of Precalculus Discipline in Senior High School. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Studies, DOI: 10.32996/ijllt.2020.1.2.3
  36. Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (2016). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design (2nd Ed). Routledge, 175
  37. Maison, Darmaji, Astalini, Kurniawan, D. A., & Indrawati, P. S. (2019). Science Process Skills and Motivation. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5), 48–56. doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.756
  38. Medical College of Wisconsin (2022). Sociocultural Theory of Cognitive Development: A Guide to Vygotsky’s Theory of Learning
  39. Merriam, S. B. & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design & Implementation (4th Ed). Jossey-Bass, 96
  40. Official Gazette of the Philippines (n.d.). What is Kto12 Program? https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/k-12/
  41. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2014). Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en
  42. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2018) Definitions of Research and Development: An Annotated Compilation of Official Sources
  43. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2019). Programme for International Student Assessment results from PISA 2018. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_PHL.pdf.
  44. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
  45. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): Learning During – and From Disruption. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en
  46. Rahman, S. & Chavhan, R. (2022). 7E Model: An Effective Instructional Approach for Teaching Learning. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(1) 339-345. DOI:10.36713/epra2013
  47. Samosa, R. C. (2021). COSIM (Comics Cum SIM): An innovative material in teaching biology. European Journal of Research Development and Sustainability 2(4),19-28
  48. Satriani, E. (2018). Reading Comprehension Difficulties Encountered by English Students of Islamic University of Riau. Journal of English for Academic, 5(2) DOI:10.25299/jshmic.2018.vol5(2).1885
  49. Sinco, M. G. M. (2020). Strategic Intervention Materials: A Tool in Improving Students’ Academic Performance. International Journal for Research in Applied And Natural Science, 6(5)
  50. Suarez, M. G. & Casinillo, L. F. (2020). Effect of strategic intervention material (SIM) on academic performance: evidence from students of science VI. Review of Socio- Economic Research and Development Studies, 4(1) 20-32
  51. Sumandal, A. H. & De Gracia, R. S. (2023). Utilization of Electronic – Strategic Intervention Material (E-SIM) in Teaching General Biology for STEM Students. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews 4(10) doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.4.1023.102621
  52. Tagupa, E. & Arnado, A. (2023). Development and Validation of Motivational Manipulative Learning Materials (MMLMs) for the Least-Learned Competencies of Grade 9 Trigonometry. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(2) 1002-1022
  53. Yoldere, H. M., Adamu. M., & Inuwa, I. A. (2018) The Roles of Science Teachers in Promoting Science Education for Sustainable Development in the North Eastern Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Research and Management Technology, 3(1) 82-90.
  54. Zabala, O. E. (2023). Strategic Intervention Material (SIM) on Senior High School Student Learning in Stocks and Bonds. American Journal of Education and Technology.2(4), 24-29 https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v2i4.2182
  55. Zalun, J. (2023). The Teachers’ Utilization of the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCS) and its Relation to the Learning Development of Grade Six Pupils in a Public School in the Philippines: Basis for a Proposed Program. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research 4(6) 1888-1903. http://dx.doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.06.15

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic