Home⇛Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Development⇛vol. 12 no. 3 Part 4 (2024)

Police Community Relations and Internal Security Operations in One Province in CALABARZON: Basis for an Enhanced Anti-Insurgency Countermeasures

Elmer B. Aguila

Discipline: Politics

 

Abstract:

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Police Community Relations (PCR) program and Internal Security Operations (ISO) of the Philippine National Police (PNP) in selected municipalities in the province of Laguna, CALABARZON. Using a descriptive research design, the study focused on evaluating PCR in terms of trust and legitimacy, communication, community involvement, incident reporting, and demographics. It also examined ISO effectiveness based on resource allocation, technology and innovation, community engagement and support, and intelligence sharing. The study tested for significant differences in perceived effectiveness across municipalities. Findings revealed that PCR was generally rated as effective, particularly in trust, legitimacy, and communication. ISO was rated very effective, especially in community engagement and intelligence sharing. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences in effectiveness across municipalities, indicating uniform implementation of programs and operations. Based on these findings, an action plan was proposed to strengthen anti-insurgency countermeasures. Recommendations include increased funding and manpower for ISO, investment in advanced detection technologies, continuous community dialogues, and regular training in cyber intelligence for operational teams. The proposed action plan may be reviewed by PNP Laguna leadership for future implementation and evaluation. Future researchers are encouraged to conduct similar studies in other municipalities within the province..



References:

  1. Colorafi, K. J., & Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(4), 16-25.
  2. Modise, J. M. (2023). Community Engagement in Policing: A Path to More Meaningful, Knowledgeable, and Successful Public Consultation. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(6), 3892-3906.
  3. Hill, S., Giles, H., & Maguire, E. R. (2021). VOICES: A theory-driven intervention for improving relationships between police and the public. Policing: An International Journal, 44(5), 786-799.
  4. Tyler, T. (2017). Procedural justice and policing: A rush to judgment?. Annual review of law and social science, 13(1), 29-53.
  5. Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of experimental criminology, 9, 245-274.
  6. O'Brien, T. C., & Tyler, T. R. (2019). Rebuilding trust between police & communities through procedural justice & reconciliation. Behavioral science & policy, 5(1), 35-50.
  7. O'Reilly, K. M. (2017). Transparency, accountability, and engagement: A recipe for building trust in policing (Doctoral dissertation, Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School).
  8. GAICHU, J. M., Onyango, R. S. R. D. E., & Odhiambo, S. (2024). Influence Of Public Trust in the Police on Crime Reporting Behavior in Kamukunji Subcounty, Nairobi County, Kenya.
  9. Griffiths, C. T. (2022). INTERAGENCY COMMUNICATION, COLLABORATION, AND INTEROPERABILITY WITHIN POLICE SERVICES AND BETWEEN POLICE SERVICES AND OTHER EMERGENCY SERVICES. School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University.
  10. Albrecht, J. F. (2024). Initiatives to Improve Police–Community Collaboration and Trust. In Special Topics in Policing: Critical Issues and Global Perspectives, Volume 1 (pp. 187-203). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  11. Jannetta, J., Esthappan, S., Fontaine, J., Lynch, M., & La Vigne, N. (2019). Learning to build police-community trust. The Urban Institute.
  12. Azeem, M. M. (2024). POLICING AND COMMUNITY TRUST: CHALLENGES AND PATHWAYS IN THE UNITED STATES. PAKISTAN ISLAMICUS (An International Journal of Islamic & Social Sciences), 4(03), 257-264.
  13. Daniels-Shpall, A. (2019). Strategies for (re) building community trust: A review of practices in the New Zealand police. Fulbright New Zealand.
  14. Katz, G. I. (2022). A Guide to More Effective Police-Community Relations through Media, Personal Engagement and Collaborative Events. US-China L. Rev., 19, 344.
  15. Aminu, M., Akinsanya, A., Dako, D. A., & Oyedokun, O. (2024). Enhancing cyber threat detection through real-time threat intelligence and adaptive defense mechanisms. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 13(8), 11-27.
  16. Udochukwu, I. S., & Uchenna, N. J. (2024). Dissecting the Effect and Challenges Of Intelligence Coordination As Method Of Effective Counter-Insurgence In Nigeria. GSJ, 12(10).
  17. Alaeifar, P., Pal, S., Jadidi, Z., Hussain, M., & Foo, E. (2024). Current approaches and future directions for cyber threat intelligence sharing: A survey. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 83, 103786.
  18. Owuondo, J. (2024). Enhancing Kenya's National Security: Optimizing Early Warning and Response Surveillance Systems. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8.
  19. Nte, N. D., & Nte, U. N. (2025). The Intelligence-Led Risk Management for National Security sand Public Safety in Nigeria: Strengthening the Collaborative Continuum for Optimum Efficiency. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Politik dan Humaniora, 8(1), 1-21.
  20. Trim, P. R., & Lee, Y. I. (2022). Combining sociocultural intelligence with Artificial Intelligence to increase organizational cyber security provision through enhanced resilience. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 6(4), 110.
  21. Ofili, B. T., Ezeadi, S. C., & Jegede, T. B. (2024). Securing US national interests with cloud innovation: data sovereignty, threat intelligence and digital warfare preparedness. Int J Sci Res Arch, 12(01), 3160-3179.
  22. Kim III, T. R. (2024). Reducing Entropy Through Targeted Information Sharing: An Exploratory First Principles Approach to Closing the Gaps in Modern Security Operations Centers (Doctoral dissertation, Marymount University).
  23. Sindiramutty, S. R., Prabagaran, K. R. V., Jhanjhi, N. Z., & Murugesan, R. K. (2024). Threat Intelligence and Information Sharing. Utilizing Generative AI for Cyber Defense Strategies, 191.
  24. Wagner, T. D., Mahbub, K., Palomar, E., & Abdallah, A. E. (2019). Cyber threat intelligence sharing: Survey and research directions. Computers & Security, 87, 101589.
  25. Nix, J., Wolfe, S. E., & Rojek, J. (2015). Trust in the police: The influence of procedural justice and perceived collective efficacy. Crime & Delinquency, 61(4), 610–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714530548
  26. Kochel, T. R. (2019). Explaining racial differences in Ferguson’s impact on local residents’ trust and perceived legitimacy: Policy implications for police. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(2), 196–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403416684923
  27. Hamm, J. A., Trinkner, R., & Carr, J. D. (2017). Fair process, trust, and cooperation: Moving toward an integrated framework of police legitimacy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817710058
  28. Lawrence, D. S., Rosenbaum, D. P., Hartnett, S. M., McDevitt, J., & Posick, C. (2015). Measuring procedural justice and legitimacy at the local level: The police–community interaction survey. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(3), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9228-9
  29. Tartaro, C., & Mastrangelo, M. A. (2022). Officer trust towards community members and critical incidents: A comparison of factors. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 38, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09515-9
  30. Schulenberg, J. L., Chenier, A., & Buffone, S. (2017). An application of procedural justice to stakeholder perspectives: Examining police legitimacy and public trust in police complaints systems. Policing and Society, 27(6), 676–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2015.1102252
  31. Holliday, B. S., & Wagstaff, J. H. Jr. (2022). The relationship between citizen oversight and procedural justice measures in policing. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(2), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09610-3
  32. Fry Sandoval, C. A. (2024). Cultural and Societal Influences on Perceptions of Police Legitimacy and Trust in Law Enforcement Among Minority Communities.
  33. Patrick, B., & Rollins, A. C. (2022). Delivering culturally competent and equitable police services via social media: Assessing two-way dialogue between police agencies and vulnerable citizens. Public Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 1–34.
  34. Attah, R. U., Garba, B. M. P., Gil-Ozoudeh, I., & Iwuanyanwu, O. (2024). Strategic partnerships for urban sustainability: Developing a conceptual framework for integrating technology in community-focused initiatives. GSC Adv Res Rev, 21(2), 409-18.
  35. Nechesov, A., & Ruponen, J. (2024). Empowering Government Efficiency Through Civic Intelligence: Merging Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain for Smart Citizen Proposals. Technologies, 12(12), 271.
  36. Kangana, N., Kankanamge, N., De Silva, C., Goonetilleke, A., Mahamood, R., & Ranasinghe, D. (2024). Bridging Community Engagement and Technological Innovation for Creating Smart and Resilient Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Smart Cities, 7(6), 3823-3852.
  37. Al Waroi, M. N. A. L. Coordination and Collaboration between Secret Intelligence Agencies and Government Institutions: Challenges, Opportunities, and Dynamics.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic