HomeAsia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Developmentvol. 13 no. 1 Part 1 (2025)

Physical Environment, Professional Development and Teaching Quality in Chinese Universities

Xu Zhaoqing | Beverly T. Caiga

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

This study investigated the physical environment, professional development, and teaching quality in Chinese universities to propose a program for enhancing teacher education. A descriptive research design was employed, surveying 460 teachers selected from three universities (sample size determined using Raosoft). Respondents' profiles (sex, age, education, service length) were documented. Physical environment was assessed based on adequacy, arrangement, sense of control, and symbolic features. Professional development evaluated thematic knowledge, educational technology, research base, educational design, and human resource development. Teaching quality was measured in terms of competence, content, and method. Findings revealed a majority of male respondents, aged 26-30, with master's degrees and less than five years of service. Arrangement was considered significant in the physical environment, and Educational Designing was deemed crucial for professional development. Competence was the dominant aspect of teaching quality. A significant difference in symbolic characteristics was found when grouped by age. Furthermore, there was an important relationship identified among physical environment, professional development, and teaching quality.



References:

  1. Nwuke, T. J., & Nwanguma, T. K. (2024). Provision and utilization of physical resources for effective teaching and learning effectiveness in public universities in Rivers State. International Journal of Applied and Scientific Research, 2(2), 227-244.
  2. Karaca, A. Z. (2018). Elements that promote interdisciplinarity in higher education environments and campuses.
  3. Sonia, G. (Ed.). (2017). Educational research and innovation pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession. oecd Publishing.
  4. Ramdass, K. R., & Mokgohloa, K. (2023, October). Curriculum design in higher education: A reflection. In Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Learning, ECEL 2023 (Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 252-260).
  5. Johnston, E., Burleigh, C., & Wilson, A. (2020). Interdisciplinary Collaborative Research for Professional Academic Development in Higher Education. Higher Learning Research Communications, 10(1), 62-77.
  6. Xu, J., & Grant, G. (2022). Validating a questionnaire on physical environment factors associated with remote work.
  7. Thahir, M., Komariah, A., Kurniady, D. A., Suharto, N., Kurniatun, T. C., Widiawati, W., & Nurlatifah, S. (2021). Professional development and job satisfaction on teaching performance. Linguistics and Culture Review, 2507-2522.
  8. Shen, Y. Hai-Lin Ji, X., Qi-Fan, M. & Yan-Lin, L. (2023). Human-computer interaction technology in virtual reality immersive learning - an example of K12 physics laboratory teaching. Research on Electrochemical Education (10), 87-94+120. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2023.10.012.
  9. Roster, C. A., & Ferrari, J. R. (2020). Does work stress lead to office clutter, and how? Mediating influences of emotional exhaustion and indecision. Environment and Behavior, 52(9), 923-944.
  10. Shobe, K. (2018). Productivity driven by job satisfaction, physical work environment, management support and job autonomy. Business and Economics Journal, 9(2), 1-9.
  11. Brown, J. T. (2022). Cultivating Affinity and Influence Through Digital Communications: Insights to Enhance Millennial Workforce Engagement.
  12. Hafeez, I., Yingjun, Z., Hafeez, S., Mansoor, R., & Rehman, K. U. (2019). Impact of workplace environment on employee performance: mediating role of employee health. Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 17(2), 173-193.
  13. Potdevin, F., Vors, O., Huchez, A., Lamour, M., Davids, K., & Schnitzler, C. (2018). How can video feedback be used in physical education to support novice learning in gymnastics? Effects on motor learning, self-assessment and motivation. Physical education and sport pedagogy, 23(6), 559-574.
  14. Docherty, A., Warkentin, P., Borgen, J., Garthe, K., Fischer, K. L., & Najjar, R. H. (2018). Enhancing student engagement: Innovative strategies for intentional learning. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34(6), 470-474.
  15. Permatasari, N., & Tandiayuk, S. (2023). Human Resource Management in Education: Optimizing Teacher Performance for Better Learning Outcomes. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format, 3(1), 35-59.
  16. Penuel, W. R. (2019). Infrastructuring as a practice of design-based research for supporting and studying equitable implementation and sustainability of innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4-5), 659-677.
  17. Huong, H. T. L., Huy, N. H. D., & Ha, N. N. (2018). The Flipped classroom: Using thematic teaching to develop critical thinking for high school students. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 828-835.
  18. Dontre, A. J. (2021). The influence of technology on academic distraction: A review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(3), 379-390.
  19. Uerz, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators' competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12-23.
  20. Tekir, S., & Akar, H. (2019). The current state of instructional materials education: Aligning policy, standards, and teacher education curriculum. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 19.
  21. Fardlillah, Q., & Suryono, Y. (2019, April). Physical environment classroom: Principles and design elements of classroom in early childhood education. In International Conference on Special and Inclusive Education (ICSIE 2018) (pp. 120-127). Atlantis Press.
  22. Barrett, P., Treves, A., Shmis, T., & Ambasz, D. (2019). The impact of school infrastructure on learning: A synthesis of the evidence.
  23. Liu, Y. (2024). Research on the Development Path of Higher Education Institutions in Underdeveloped Areas Under the Perspective of the" Collaborative Quality Improvement Plan for Teacher Education". International Journal of Educational Teaching and Research, 1(3).