Home⇛ISTRADOR: Research Journal on Education, Technology and Innovation⇛vol. 2 no. 2 (2024)

Academic Standard, Ethical And Effective Integration Of GenerativeArtificial Intelligence (Ai) In Marikina Polytechnic College

Jonathan P. Diokno

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This policy brief intends to address the issues on Generative AI by outlining a decision-making foundation for incorporating AI technologies into education. Academics feel that ChatGPT will be useful as a tool in scientific research and educational procedures (Livberber & Ayvaz, 2023). It is critical that teachers make educated decisions about whether to employ or reject generative AI technologies and their results in student work. The goal is to concentrate on the total benefit of students, their learning experiences, and their preparation for the changing terrain of the future. While for Davison et al. (2003), Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools have the potential to be useful research helpers. They can help in developing competence with study areas, assimilating information available, analyzing data, and translating material, while errors are possible. These technologies, which are especially useful for non-native language users, help to promote diversity and inclusivity in academic areas. AI technologies may be assistance to authors in improving revision notes and offering thorough explanations in response to reviewer comments.



References:

  1. Dalalah, D., & Dalalah, O. M. (2023). The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: The case of ChatGPT. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ij me.2023.100822
  2. Davison, R. M., Laumer, S., Tarafdar, M., & Wong, L. H. (2023). Pickled eggs: Generative AI as research assistantor Co-author? Information Systems Journal, 33(5), 989-994. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12 455
  3. Livberber, T., & Ayvaz, S. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence in academia: Views of Turkish academics on ChatGPT. Heliyon, 9(9), e19688 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19688
  4. Longoni, C., Tully, S., & Shariff, A. (2023). Plagiarizing AI- generated content is seen as less unethical and more permissible. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/na3wb  
  5. Republic Act No. 10173
  6. Sebastian, G. (2023). Privacy and data protection in ChatGPT and other AI chatbots: Strategies for securing user information. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssr n.4454761
  7. Sharples, M. (2023). Towards social generative AI for education: Theory, practices and ethics. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 159-167.https://doi.org/10.1080/23735 082.2023.2261131

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic