Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 20 no. 7 (2024)

Effectiveness of Simulation Strategy in Teaching Selected Topics in Biology at Assumption College Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand

Jefferson  Tangonan | Mary Ann Biscocho

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Teaching biology in high school is challenging, with numerous topics to cover and potential pitfalls to avoid. Traditional teaching methods, like using textbook pictures, can be ineffective, especially when teaching complex concepts like evolution, genetics, and kingdoms of classification. To address this, educators are turning to simulations to improve the teaching and learning process. Simulations have been used in various fields for decades, allowing scientists to model and communicate complex ideas effectively. Not surprisingly, science students also benefit from using simulations to enhance their understanding and knowledge integration. A study in Bangkok, Thailand, investigated the effectiveness of using simulations to teach selected topics in biology to Grade 12 students. The research compared a traditional lecture-based approach with a simulation-based method using an interactive computer simulation called PLIX. Results showed that students in the simulation-based group had significantly higher posttest scores than those in the traditional teaching group. This suggests that incorporating simulations into biology lessons can enhance students' understanding of complex scientific concepts. Educators are encouraged to integrate simulation-based teaching methods into their curricula to improve student learning and engagement in science education.



References:

  1. Abi Abdallah, D. S., Fonner, C. W., Lax, N. C., Babeji, M. R., & Palé, F. (2023). Using Avida-ED digital organisms to teach evolution and natural selection benefits a broad student population. The American Biology Teacher, 85(2), 85-90.
  2. Branch, G., & Reid, A. (2020). Teaching evolution in U.S public schools: A continuing challenge. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 13(14).
  3. Caetano, B. C., Lara, I. F., Borges, M. U., Sandoval, O. R., & Valle, R. M. (2019). A novel methodology on beta-type Stirling engine simulation using CFD. Energy conversion and management, 184, 510-520.
  4. Cayvaz, A., Akcay, H., & Kapici, H. O. (2020). Comparison of simulation-based and textbook-based instructions on middle school students’ achievement, inquiry skills and attitudes. International Journal of Education in mathematics Science and Technology, 8(1).
  5. Checa, D., Miguel-Alonso, I., & Bustillo, A. (2021). Immersive virtual-reality computer-assembly serious game to enhance autonomous learning. Virtual Reality, 1-18.
  6. Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Sage Journal, 90(4).
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
  8. D’ Errico, M. (2021). Immersive virtual reality simulation: Facilitating an engaging learning experience. Science Direct, 54, 30-34.
  9. Ferguson, J., Astbury, J., Willis, S., Silverthorne, j., & Schafheutle, E. (2020). Implementing, embedding, and sustaining simulation-based education: What helps, what hinders. Medical Education, 54, 915-924.
  10. Freeman, S., Quillin, K., Allison, L., Black, M., Podgorski, G., Taylor, E., & Carmichael, J. (2014). Biological Science. Pearson
  11. Gholam, A. P. (2019). Inquiry-based learning: Student teachers’ challenges and perceptions. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 10(2), 6.
  12. Hanisch, S., & Eirdosh, D. (2020). Educational potential of teaching evolution as an interdisciplinary science.
  13. Karatas, A. (2019). Opinions of pre-service teachers about evolution. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(8), 1-12.
  14. Kasi, P., et al. (2017). Science Education in Thailand: Challenges and Initiatives. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(6), 1031-1046.
  15. Kim, Y. J., Choi, S., & Lee, J. W. (2017). Using t-test for data analysis. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 23(3), 243-249.
  16. Lateef, F. (2020). Maximixing learning and creativity: Understanding psychological safety in simulation-based learning.
  17. Lee, J., Kim, H., Kim, K, H., Jung, D., Jowsey, T., & Webster, C. (2021). Effective virtual patient simulators for medical communication training: A systematic review.
  18. OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  19. Prakit, J. (2017). Difficulties faced by thai science students in studying ecology. International Journal of Environmental Science Education, 12 (3), 459-469.
  20. Peregrino, L. P., Javillonar, M. G., Caballes, D. G., Necio, C. R., & Balina, M. D. (2020). The students’ challenges in learning evolution and their level of mastery: An input to an enhancement program. Journal of Social Sciences and Management.
  21. Reddy, M., & Mint, P. P. (2017). Impact of simulation-based education on biology student’s academic achievement in DNA replication. Journal of Education and Practice, 8 (15), 72-75.
  22. Ruparanganda, F. (2019). Challenges faced by Biology secondary teachers when using instructional methods that promote Science Technology, Engineering and Mathematic (STEM) Education in Zimbabwe. Texila International Journal of Academic Research, Volume 6, Issue 2.
  23. Sapp, Luna. (2018). 6 reasons why science teachers should use simulations. Education, Innovations, Insights and Resources.
  24. Saxena, R. (2022). A teaching moment. Highpoint magazine, Episode 3.
  25. Scharmann, L. C. (2021) “Evolutionary theory: Establishing positive learning environments” (2021). Faculty Publications: Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education. 451.
  26. Sibeoni, J., Verneuil, L., Manolios, E., & Révah-Levy, A. (2020). A specific method for qualitative medical research: the IPSE (Inductive Process to analyze the Structure of lived Experience) approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 1-21.
  27. Stocker, M., Burmester, M., & Allen, M. (2014). Optimisation of simulated team training through the application of learning theories: A debate for a conceptual framework. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 1-9.
  28. Talan, T. (2021). The effect of simulation technique on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(1).
  29. Talbot, C., George, Z., & Ogden, T. H. (2020). A study of biology majors’ attitudes towards evolution throughout their university coursework. Journal of College Science Teaching, Volume 50 (1).
  30. Thomas, N. J., & Vo, T. (2021). Using simulations to support undergraduate elementary preservice teachers’ biological understanding of natural selection. Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching, 47(1), 29-39.
  31. Tomaimoon, S., & Sudrudruk, R. (2019). The difficulties in understanding biology among thai secondary students. Journal of Education and Practice, 10 (7), 13-17.
  32. Wilson, K. J., Long, T. M., Momsen, J. L., & Bray Speth, E. (2020). Modeling in the classroom: Making relationships and systems visible. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(1), 1.
  33. Wongsirisuit, J. (2015). Difficulties in learning and teaching molecular biology among high school students in Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 980-986.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic