HomePsychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journalvol. 21 no. 9 (2024)

Crossing the Borders in Utilizing English Varieties: Filipino Teachers’ Experiences and Perceptions

Ma. Rebecca Abayan | Hyasinth Tribujeña | Fatima  Butil

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

The success of teaching and learning English largely depends on language teachers. In addition to their technical and pedagogical expertise, the teachers' proficiency in several languages is crucial in ensuring that learners acquire English to the greatest extent possible. Filipino English teachers vary in terms of their experiences in teaching English in nations where it is used as a foreign language (EFL), English as a second language (ESL), or English as a native language (ENL), especially when it comes to using the English variety in the classroom. The study aims to determine Filipino teachers' teaching experiences and perceptions of using English varieties in teaching in the ENL/ESL/EFL countries. This qualitative study employs the case study design and follows Kachru's Three Concentric Circles Model. Three Filipino teachers were chosen as participants using purposive sampling were selected according to the following criteria: Filipino female teachers who are teaching English to middle/junior high school in ENL, ESL, and EFL countries only, ages ranged from 25-45, with Masters degree related to their field of teaching, and has taught English for more than two years. The research questionnaire, one-on-one interview, and focus-group discussion were used to collect relevant data about the study. The direct transcriptions from the audio recordings of the individual interviews were subjected to data processing using Creswell's Thematic Analysis. The study's findings showed that the use of different English varieties is intimately related to the linguistic society's dominant language and the primary teaching objectives. Although teachers consider American English the mainstream variation, it is evident that all three linguistic groups also utilize the local varieties of English. It also showed that their beliefs on using different forms of English in the classroom were primarily based on functionality, proximity, inclusivity and awareness, and propensity for comprehension.



References:

  1. Al-Mutairi, M. A. (2020). Kachru’s Three Concentric Circles Model of English Language: An Overview of Criticism & the Place of  Kuwait in It. English Language Teaching, 13(1), 85-88.
  2. Amjah, D. Y. (2014). A study of teachers’ strategies to develop students’ interest towards learning English as a second language.  Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 188-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.238
  3. Balgoa, N. (2019). Filipino English Teachers in Japan: “Nonnativeness” and the teaching and learning of English. Journal of Language  Teaching and research, 10 2), 256-263. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1002.06
  4. Bautista, M. L. S. (2003). World Englishes, Philippine English and English language education in the Philippines.Lecture given  toJapanese academics on March21, 2003.
  5. Bautista, A. (2020). Filipino English Teachers Overseas: A Case Study of the Filipino English Teachers’ Language Ideology. DLSU  Research Congress 2020 . https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/i.1.1.
  6. Bećirović, S. (2012). The Role of Intercultural Education in Fostering Cross-Cultural Understanding. Epiphany, 5(1), 139-156
  7. Cabiladas,R. P. (2023). Lived experiences of filipino teachers teaching English in a bilingual and enbglish program in government  schools of Thailand: A phenomenology Inquiry. Univesity of the Visayas. DOI:10.14457/TU.the.2020.1261
  8. Chang, Y. J. (2014). Learning English today: What can World Englishes teach college students in Taiwan? English Today, 30(1), 21– 27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078413000527
  9. Cook, V. (2007). The goals of ELT: Reproducing native-speakers or promoting multicompetence among second language users?. In  International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 237-248). Boston, MA: Springer US.
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study.
  11. Cummins, J. (2007). Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian journal of applied  linguistics, 10(2), 221-240.
  12. Doyle, T. (2022). Effects of Teacher Expectations and Perceptions on Student Achievement in the Urban Classroom (Doctoral  dissertation, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology).
  13. Elyas, T., & Alghofaili, N. M. (2019). Native English speakers versus non-native English speakers: The impact of language teachers  on EFL learner’s English proficiency. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(2), 27-38. doi: 10.25134/erjee.v7i2.1773.
  14. Floris, F. & Renandya, W. (2020). Promoting the Value of Non-native English-Speaking Teachers. PASAA Vol. 59, pp. 1-19.  García, O. (2009). Emergent Bilinguals and TESOL: What’s in a Name?. Tesol Quarterly, 43(2), 322-326.
  15. Gray, J. (2010). The branding of English and the culture of the new capitalism: Representations of the world of work in English  language textbooks. Applied linguistics, 31(5), 714-733.
  16. Hamid, M. O., & Baldauf Jr, R. B. (2013). Second language errors and features of world Englishes. World Englishes, 32(4), 476-494. Hayes, D. (2009). Non-native English-speaking teachers, context and English language teaching. System, 37(1), 1-11. Holliday, A. (2008). Standards of English and politics of inclusion. Language teaching, 41(1), 119-130. Hurtig, M. (2007). Varieties of English in the Swedish classroom.
  17. Jenkins, J. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes and English as a lingua franca. TESOL quarterly, 40(1), 157-181. Jenkins, J. (2015). Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca. Englishes in Practice, 2(3), 49-85.
  18. Jindapitak, N., & Teo, A. (2013). Accent Priority in a Thai University Context: A Common Sense Revisited.English Language  Teaching,6(9), 193-201.
  19. Kachru, B. B. (1985) Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: the English language in the outer circle. Kachru, B. B. (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  20. Kachru, Y. (2005). Teaching and learning of World Englishes. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.  155-173). Routledge.
  21. Kachru, Y., & Nelson, C. L. (2006). World Englishes in Asian contexts (Vol. 1). Hong Kong University Press.
  22. Karpinski, M. (2018, April, 25). IELTS vs. TOEFL: Which should you take? Retrieved from https://www.hotcoursesabroad.com/study-abroad-info/applying-to-university/ielts-toefl-differences/
  23. Kirkpatrick, A. (2008). English as the official working language of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): Features  and strategies. English today, 24(2), 27-34.
  24. Kurland, H., & Hasson-Gilad, D. R. (2015). Organizational learning and extra effort: The mediating effect of job satisfaction. Teaching  and teacher education, 49, 56-67.
  25. Lee, M., Shetgiri, R., Barina, A., Tillitski, J., & Flores, G. (2015). Raising bilingual children: A qualitative study of parental attitudes,  beliefs, and intended behaviors. Hispanic journal of behavioral sciences, 37(4), 503-521.
  26. Lee, I. (2023). Problematising Written Corrective Feedback: A Global Englishes Perspective. Applied Linguistics, 44(4), 791-796.
  27. Lemana II, H. E. . (2022). Filipinos and Indians as English Language Teachers in the Emirates: A Phenomenology. International Journal  of Qualitative Research, 2(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijqr.v2i1.480
  28. Martin-Beltran, M., & Peercy, M. M. (2014). Collaboration to teach English language learners: Opportunities for shared teacher  learning. Teachers and Teaching, 20(6), 721-737.
  29. Matsuda, A. (2003). Incorporating world Englishes in teaching English as an international language. Tesol Quarterly, 37(4), 719-729. McKay, S. L. (2018). English as an international language: What it is and what it means for pedagogy. RELC Journal, 49(1), 9-23. Mesthrie, R., & Bhatt, R. M. (2008). World Englishes: The study of new linguistic varieties. Cambridge University Press.
  30. Otheguy, R., García, O., & Reid, W. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied linguistics review, 6(3), 281-307.
  31. Ozaki, S. (2022). The Impact of English on the Economic Development of the Philippines.
  32. Pontillas, M. (2021). Opportunitites and challengtes of a filipino educator in a home-based onine EFL Industry: A Single Case Study.  DOI: 10.52631/jemds.v1i1.21
  33. Quirk, R. (1990). Language varieties and standard language. English today, 6(1), 3-10.
  34. Quirk, R. (1985) The English language in a global context. In R. Quirk and H. G. Widdowson (Eds), English in the World: Teaching  and learning the language and literatures (pp. 1-6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Rahmatillah, R., Rahma, E. A., Jakfar, A. E., & Oktavinanda, G. (2022). Current challenges and benefits of teaching World Englishes.  EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka): Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 7(1), 94-101.
  36. Renandya, W. A., Hamied, F. A., & Nurkamto, J. (2018) English Language Proficiency in Indonesia: Issues and Prospects. The Journal  of AsiaREFL, 15(3), 616-629. 
  37. Reyes, J. A. (2020). From exposition to adaptation: The lived experiences of Filipino educators working in an international school  setting, A Phenomenology. International journal of innovative Science and tesearch Technology. ISSN No:-2456-2165. Volume 5,  Issue 12. https://ijisrt.com/assets/upload/files/IJISRT20DEC093.pdf
  38. Rezaei, S., Khosravizadeh, P., & Mottaghi, Z. (2019). Attitudes toward World Englishes among Iranian English language learners.  Asian Englishes, 21(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1440367
  39. Rizvić E., & Bećirović, S., (2017). Willingness to Communicate in English as a Foreign Language in Bosnian-Herzegovinian EFL  Context, European Researcher, 8(3), 224-235
  40. Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Galloway, N. (2021). Global Englishes and language teaching: A review of pedagogical research. Language  Teaching, 54(2), 157-189.
  41. Salih, A. A., & Holi, H. I. (2018). English Language and the Changing Linguistic Landscape: New Trends in ELT Classrooms. Arab  World English Journal, 9 (1). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.7
  42. Seidlhofer, B. (2009). Common ground and different realities: World Englishes and English as a lingua franca. World Englishes, 28(2),  236-245.
  43. Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Exploring the nature of research questions in mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(3), 207-211.
  44. Tamco, A. B. R. (2022). Philippine English in the ESL colassroom: a study of English teachers’ beliefs and pedagogical practices in  higher education. Globus journal of Progressive education. Vol 12 / No 1 / Jan-Jun 2022 ISSN: 2231-1335
  45. Tanghe, S. (2014). Integrating World Englishes into a university conversation class in South Korea. English Today, 30(2), 18–23.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607841400008X
  46. Ulla, M. B. (2021). Filipinos as EFL Teachers in Bangkok, Thailand: Implications for Language Education Policy in the ASEAN  Region. RELC Journal, 52(3), 588-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219879775
  47. Vodopija-Krstanovic, I., & Marinac, M. (2019). English as an international language and English language teaching: The theory vs.  practice divide. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 19-38.
  48. Wetzl, A. M. (2013). World Englishes in the mainstream composition course/ : Undergraduate students respond to WE writing.  Research in the Teaching of English, 48(2), 204–227.
  49. Widdowson, H. G. (2012). ELF and the inconvenience of established concepts.Journal of English as a Lingua franca,1(1), 5-26.
  50. Wong, T. T. & Dubey-Jhaveri, A. (2015). English language education in a global world: practices, issues and challenges. Nova Science  Publishers, Inc. ISBN: 978-1-63483-497-1 DOI10.13140/RG.2.1.4479.1129