Home⇛Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal⇛vol. 38 no. 7 (2025)

Development and Acceptability of an Electronic Problem-Based Learning Module Integrating 5C’s in Teaching Mathematics of Investment

Ludimer Delegiro | Allan Jay S. Cajandig

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Digital tools and student-centered strategies like PBL are increasingly vital for developing problem-solving skills in complex mathematical subjects, such as Mathematics of Investment. This study developed and evaluated an electronic Problem-Based Learning module in teaching Mathematics of Investment among Grade 11 HUMSS students. Prior research supports the integration of multimedia elements such as text, illustrations, images, and infographics as effective tools for enhancing mathematical problem-solving skills. To address this instructional gap, the study employed a Research and Development (R&D) design guided by the ADDIE model, involving 50 students and nine experts in mathematics, media, and language. Diagnostics identified students struggle with annuities and interest calculations, prompting to design an ePBL module via Canva and Hyzine. This e-module embedded multimedia elements within the 5C framework (Connect, Comprehend, Collaborate, Create, Critique) to address learning gaps. Three mathematics education experts validated and rated the ePBL module highly in terms of content (M=3.71, SD=0.23) alignment with learning objectives, format (M=3.72, SD=0.29) for clarity, presentation and organization (M=3.67, SD=0.24) for logical flow, accuracy (M=4.00, SD=0.00) for conceptual correctness. In addition, three language experts evaluated the ePBL module’s language use (M=4.67, SD=0.33) was clear and appropriate, while three media experts assessed the integration of multimedia elements (M=4.53, SD=0.24) effectively enhanced comprehension. Students rated the ePBL module positively: content (M= 3.75, SD=0.34) for fostering critical thinking, presentation and organization (M=3.82, SD=0.05) for clarity, multimedia elements (M=3.73, SD=0.10) effectively enhanced engagement and supported comprehension, making the module a well-structured and engaging learning tool. The findings highlight ePBL’s role in connecting abstract concepts to practical financial literacy, equipping students with actionable skills.



References:

  1. Azizah, U., Pramudiani, P., Mulyono, H., & Putri, R. I. I. (2021). Development of website-based mathematics learning media to improve problem-solving skills in middle school students. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(2), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i2.16372
  2. Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20(6), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01386.x
  3. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
  4. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
  5. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley.
  6. Department of Education (DepEd). (2020). DepEd Order No. 18, s. 2020: Guidelines on the use of funds for learning resources and learning management system. https://www.deped.gov.ph
  7. Department of Education. (2021). General Mathematics: Solving problems involving simple and compound interest (Quarter 2, Module3).DepEdTambayan.https://depedtambayan.net/wpcontent/uploads/2021/11/genmath_q2_mod3_SolvingProblemsInvolvingSimpleandCompoundInterest_v2.pdf
  8. Department of Education. (2021). PPST Resource Package: Module 11 – Monitor and evaluate learner progress and achievement using learner attainment data. Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). Retrieved from https://www.studocu.com/ph/document/holy-trinity-university/structural-frame/module-11ppst5-guidelines/53841399
  9. Eriyanti, F., Rahman, A., Sari, D. P., & Yusuf, M. (2023). Enhancing student academic performance through innovative materials in online learning: A review. International Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijet.v10i3.14567
  10. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
  11. Garcia, A., & Lee, S. (2021). Utilization of the Lumi app in remote mathematics education: Student engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 32(4), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09988-9
  12. General Mathematics through a website-based platform. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 38(1), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2022.2025405
  13. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2014). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
  14. Imperial, M., & Madabushi, H. (2023). Evaluating instruction-tuned language models for education applications. arXiv preprintarXiv:2301.12652. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.12652
  15. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  16. Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge.
  17. Jones, K., Smith, A., Lee, B., Chen, D., Wilson, Z. (2022). Developing interactive e-learning content for high school mathematics using the Lumi app: Effects on student comprehension. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00354-8
  18. Juliándo, I. (2019). Research and development (R&D) as a method for educational innovation. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1), 1-15.
  19. Kamaruddin, R., Ahmad, A., Daud, M., & Ali, S. (2019). Impact of website-based learning resources on higher education mathematics students’ performance. Journal of Technology in Mathematics Education, 27(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13056196.2019.1569983
  20. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
  21. Kivunja, C. (2014). Innovative pedagogies in higher education to become effective teachers of 21st century skills: Unpacking the learning and innovations skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n4p37
  22. Levin, J. R., & Mayer, R. E. (1993). Understanding illustrations in text: Guidelines for educators. In B. K. Britton, A. Woodward, & M. Binkley (Eds.), Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice (pp. 95–113). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  23. Lorenzo, A. L., & Lorenzo, M. B. (2022). The development and evaluation of E-Self Learning Modules (E-SLM) for Grade 11
  24. Manibog, R. A. (2023). Development and validation of e-learning modules for improving skills in adding and subtracting rational expressions in Mathematics 8. Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.17509/jme.v12i3.34501
  25. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
  26. Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4930420508
  27. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
  28. National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA). (2011). Philippine Development Plan 2011-2016. https://pdp.neda.gov.ph
  29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
  30. Powell, A. B. (2018). Reflecting on digital technology in mathematical problem-solving situations. In N. Amado, S. Carreira, & K. Jones (Eds.), Broadening the scope of research on mathematical problem solving (pp. 117–143). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99861-9_8
  31. Rahayu, N. P., Widiyatmoko, A., & Arbarini, M. (2024). Development science E-module based PBL-integrated STEM on energy material. ResearchGate.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383521879_Development_Science_E-Module_Based_PBL-Integrated_STEM_on_Energy_Material
  32. Rapada, B. G., & Servañez, E. G. (2024). Development and validation of Onhan supplementary learning module on four basic operations on integers. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382005681_Development_and_Validation_of_Onhan_Supplementary_Learning_Module_on_Four_Basic_Operations_on_Integers
  33. Republic Act No. 10533, Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. (2013). Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/
  34. Samuel, M. (2009). Instructional material design and development. Sage Publications.
  35. Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows (pp. 5–15). Purdue University Press.
  36. Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. J. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x
  37. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson.
  38. Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Publishing Group.
  39. Setiyani, R., Putri, D. E., & Prasetyo, B. (2022). Development of interactive e-modules using the Kvisoft Flipbook for teaching number patterns in mathematics. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 8(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v8i2.20456
  40. Smith, R., & Nguyen, P. (2023). Enhancing problem-solving skills in middle school mathematics using interactive Lumi-based modules. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(2), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00456-1
  41. Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Academic Press.
  42. Tampubolon, R. W. (2022). Development of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) e-modules for teaching chemical bonding in mathematics-related contexts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(1), 122-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09901-8
  43. Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed.). Graphics Press.
  44. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic