HomeAnnals of Tropical Researchvol. 10 no. 2 (1988)

Host Influences On Epidemic Development Of Peanut Leaf Spot Caused By Cercosporidium Personatum (Berk. And Curt.) Deighton

Rodolfo A. Paningbatan

 

Abstract:

Based on one cycle of pathogenesis due to peanut leaf spot fungus, Cercos-poridium personatum (Berk. and Curt.) Deighton, resistant cultivars Pl 259747 and EC 76446 {292) significantly prolonged the latent period of the disease by almost two times that of susceptible cultivar CES 101. Th is indicates 50% reduc-tion in the potential number of nonoverlapping disease cycles that could be generated uring the course of the epidemic. Pl 259747 sustained a four-fold slower rate of lesion enlargement and six-fold less spore production rate than that of CES 101 based on data taken at 4, 5 and 6 weeks after inoculation. Sporulation rate was positively related to the rate of lesion enlargement {r = 0.86). Possessing some of the rate-reducing resistance traits, cultivars Pl 259747, NC Ace 17133 (RF), Pl 350680 and EC 76446 (292) significantly slowed down the progress of leaf spot epidemic in the field by 55-75% relative to that of CES 101. Pl 259747 and NC Ace 17133 {RF) distinctively reduced the numerical increase of lesions by 85% relative to CES 101 within 6 weeks from disease onset.



References:

  1. BERGER, R.D. 1977. Application of epidemiological principles to achieve plant disease control. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 15:165-183.
  2. FRY, W.E. 1982. Principles of Plant Disease Management. Academic Press, Ν.Υ. 378 p.
  3. HABGOOD, R.M. 1977. Resistance of barley cultivars to Rhynchosporium secalis. Trans. British Mycol. Soc. 69: 281-286.
  4. INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMIARID TROPICS (ICRISAT). 1981. Annual Report for 1979-1980. Patancheru P.O., Andhra Pradesh, India. 304 p.
  5. INSTITUTE OF PLANT BREEDING (IPB). 1982. Annual Report for 1981. University of the Philippines, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines. 175 p.
  6. PANINGBATAN, R.A. 1980. Culture, morphology and pathogenic variation of Cercospora species causing leafspots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Unpublished M.S. Thesis. University of the Philippines at Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines. 116 pp.
  7. PANINGBATAN, R.A. and ILAG, L.L. 1984. Resistance of peanut cultivars to Cercosporidium personatum (Berk. and Curt.) Deighton. Phil. Agric. 67: 17-24.
  8. PARLEVLIET, J.E. 1979. Components of resistance that reduce the rate of epidemic development. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 17: 203-222.
  9. PARLEVLIET, J.E. and VAN OMMEREN, A. 1975. Partial resistance to barley rust. II. Relationship between field trials, microplot tests and latent period. Euphytica 24: 293-303.
  10. PARVIN, D.W. JR., SMITH, D.H. and CROSBY, F.L. 1974. Development and evaluation of a computerized forecasting method for Cercospora leafspot of peanut. Phytopathology 64: 385-388.
  11. PHILIPPINE COUNCIL FOR AGRICULTURE AND RESOURCES RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (PCARRD). 1978. The Philippine recommends for peanut. Los Baños, Laguna. 54 p.
  12. PHIPPS, P.M. and POWELL, N.L. 1984. Evaluation of criteria for the utilization of peanut leafspot advisories in Virginia. Phytopathology 74: 1189-1193.
  13. SUBRAHMANYAM, P., HAMMONS, R.D., NIGAM, S., MCDONALD, D., GIBBONS, R.W., FAN, M.Y. and YEH, W. 1985. International cooperative screening for resistance of peanut to rust and late leafspot. Plt. Disease 67: 1108-1111.
  14. VANDERPLANK, J.E. 1975. Principles of Plant Infection. Academic Press, Ν.Υ. 216 p.
  15. ZADOKS, J.C. and SCHEIN, R.D. 1979. Epidemiology and Plant Disease Management. Oxford University Press, N.Y. 427 p.