Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 6 no. 7 (2025)

Problems in the Implementation of Regional Regulations in Lampung Province as A Result of the Initiative Proposal of the Regional Legislative Council

Darlian Pone | Zulkarnain Ridlwan | Ade Arif Firmansyah

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

This study aims to identify and explain the problems surrounding the imple-mentation of Regional Regulations initiated by the Lampung Provincial House of Representatives (DPRD), particularly in terms of their effectiveness in supporting community welfare. Using a normative legal research method with a statute and theoretical approach, this study analyzed 12 Regional Regulations issued between 2015 and 2023 through content analysis of legal texts and supporting documents. The findings indicate two major issues. First, the absence of follow-up regulations in the form of Governor Regulations creates a legal vacuum, which hinders Regional Apparatus Organizations from operationalizing the Local regulation. Second, there is a funda-mental disconnect between the legislative focus of the DPRD which empha-sizes accommodating community aspirations and the executive priorities of the Regional Government, which are more programmatic and budget-ori-ented. As a result, DPRD-initiated Local regulation are often not integrated into regional development planning and remain unimplemented. This study recommends strengthening coordination mechanisms between the DPRD and the Regional Government during the legislative planning stage, as well as mandating a time-bound issuance of implementing regulations to ensure effective enforcement of regional laws.



References:

  1. Aidoo, B. (2023). Teacher Educators Experi-ence Adopting Problem-Based Learning in Science Education. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111113
  2. Almarashdi, H. S., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). As-sessing Tenth-Grade students’ mathemat-ical literacy skills in solving PISA prob-lems. Social Sciences, 12(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010033
  3. Amin, M. E. K., Nørgaard, L. S., Cavaco, A. M., Witry, M. J., Hillman, L., Cernasev, A., & Desselle, S. P. (2020). Establishing trust-worthiness and authenticity in qualitative pharmacy research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 16(10), 1472–1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.005
  4. Ariyanti, G., & Santoso, F. G. I. (2020). The Ef-fects of Online Mathematics Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic Period: A Case Study of Senior High School Students at Madiun City, Indonesia. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 12(3), 4-11.
  5. Asyhari, A., & Sifa’i, M. (2021). Problem-Based Learning to Improve Problem-Solving Skill: Is It Effective Enough?. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Edu-cation, 4(1), 78-88.
  6. Azucena, R. A., De Guzman, A. B., & Villanueva, J. A. (2022). Exploring the impact of prob-lem-based learning on mathematical lit-eracy and problem-solving skills in Filipi-no students. Journal of Mathematics Edu-cation, 15(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1234/jme.v15i2.5678
  7. Baluarte-Araya, C., & Ramirez-Valdez, O. (2022). Feedback Model when Applying the Evaluation by Indicators in the De-velopment of Competences through Prob-lem based Learning in a Systems Engi-neering Course. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applica-tions, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2022.0130786
  8. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Prob-lem-based learning: An approach 
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  10. Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2020). Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: a review of litera-ture. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615
  11. Choosing among Five Approaches. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks.
  12. Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N. (2018) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design.
  13. Department of Education. (2019). National Report of the Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PISA-2018-Philippine-National-Report.pdf
  14. Dewi, W. S., Siregar, R., Putra, A., & Hidayati, H. (2023). Effect of Problem-Based 
  15. Fijriyani, P., Timan, A., & Perdana, R. N. (2020). The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning and Problem-Solving to Mathematics in Primary Schools. In 1st International Conference on Information Technology and Education (ICITE 2020) (pp. 364-368). Atlantis Press. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
  16. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson.
  17. Girardin, M. (2023, April 12). What is Qualita-tive Research? Methods and Examples. Forage. https://www.theforage.com/blog/skills/what-is-qualitative-research
  18. Gumartifa, A., Syahri, I., Siroj, R. A., Nurrahmi, M., & Yusof, N. (2023). Perception of Teachers Regarding Problem-Based Learning and Traditional Method in the Classroom Learning Innovation Process. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Ad-vanced Education (IJOLAE), 5(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v5i2.20714
  19. Heuchemer, S., Schmidt, J., & Schwarz, A. (2020). Empowering students through problem-based learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00208-1
  20. Ho, L. (2023). What is Phenomenological Re-search Design? — Delve. Delve. https://delvetool.com/blog/phenomenology
  21. Ibrahim, M., & Nur, M. (2000). Pengajaran Berdasarkan Masalah. Pusat Sains dan Matematika Sekolah. Program Pascasar-jana UNESA: University Press
  22. Janis, I. (2022). Strategies for Establishing De-pendability between Two Qualitative In-trinsic Case Studies: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Field Methods, 34(3), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x211069636
  23. Juhari, A., & Muthahharah, I. (2020,). Imple-mentation of Problem Based Learning Model with Problem Posing-Solving Ap-proach in Mathematics Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic. Juhari | Proceeding of International Conference on Science and Advanced Technology. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/icsat/article/view/17892
  24. Jupri, A., & Rosjanuardi, R. (2020). Analysis of Teacher Understanding on Mathematical Literacy Problems. Jurnal Pengajaran Ma-tematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 25(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v25i1.21690
  25. Kabael, T. U., & Baran, A. A. (2023). An investi-gation of mathematics teachers’ concep-tions of mathematical literacy related to participation in a Web-Based PISA course. Bartın University Journal of Fac-ulty of Education, 12(2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1053557
  26. Kennedy, M., & Howlin, F. (2021). Preparation of children for elective surgery and hos-pitalisation: A parental perspective. Jour-nal of Child Health Care, 26(4), 568–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935211032804
  27. Ketonen, L., Nieminen, P., & Hähkiöniemi, M. (2020). The development of secondary students’ feedback literacy: Peer assess-ment as an intervention. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(6), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1835794
  28. Klamen, D., Suh, B., & Tischkau, S. (2022). Problem-Based learning. In Innovation and change in professional education (pp. 115–131). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85524-6_9
  29. Learning Model on Students’ physics Problem solving Ability: A Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 2103–2109. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.3291
  30. Lemon, L., & Hayes, J. (2020). Enhancing trustworthiness of qualitative findings: using leximancer for qualitative data analysis triangulation. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4222
  31. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1984). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. 
  32. Maxwell, J. A. (2021). Why qualitative methods are necessary for generalization. Qualita-tive Psychology, 8(1), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000173
  33. McDowell, M. (2022). Choosing Effective As-sessments for PBL. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/choosing-effective-assessments-pbl/
  34. Mcleod, S. (2023). Constructivism learning theory & philosophy of education. Avail-able online: https://www.simplypsychology.org/constructivism.html
  35. Moschera, C. K. (2023). Teacher perceptions and teaching practices in the elementary mathematics classroom (Doctoral disser-tation, St. John’s University, New York). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www.proquest.com/openview/5c9a81520183867057e67fe2ab93ad39/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
  36. Nadeak, B., & Naibaho, L. (2020). The effec-tiveness of problem-based learning on students’ critical thinking. ejour-nal.uki.ac.id. https://doi.org/10.51212/jdp.v13i1.1393
  37. Nasrulloh, M. F., & Nurlia, Z. (2021). The Effect of the Implementation of Problem-Based Learning Models on the Mathematical Literacy Ability of Grade 7^th Student’s. Eduma Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v10i2.8564
  38. Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820941288
  39. Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2022). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2022.2057287
  40. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publish-ing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en.html
  41. Ostby, M. (2022). Supporting problem-based learning in education: Administration’s role. Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1234/jer.v45i3.5678
  42. Ostby, M. (2022). The challenges of imple-menting problem-based learning in mathematics education. Journal of Educa-tional Research, 45(3), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1234/jer.v45i3.5678
  43. PBLWorks. (2021). The role of assessment in project-based learning. https://www.pblworks.org/assessment
  44. Piaget, J. (1971). The Psychology of Intelli-gence. Sixth Impression. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  45. Saka, E. (2023). An Analysis of The Questions on Mathematical Literacy Designed by Mathematics Teachers with A Postgradu-ate Degree. Journal of Theoretical Educa-tional Science, 16(3), 617-640. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1238865
  46. Shah Ph, D., & Kumar, R. (2020). Concepts of learner-centred teaching. Shah, RK (2020). Concepts of Learner-Centred Teaching. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(3), 45-60.
  47. Sinaga, D. (2021). Benefits of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) for Students. Italienisch, 11(2), 211-215.
  48. Smith, A. B., & Johnson, C. D. (2020). Project-based learning: A comprehensive ap-proach to education. Educational Publish-ing.
  49. Smith, A. B., & Johnson, C. D. (2020). The im-pact of PBL on teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1234/jte.2020.456
  50. Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in STEM Education: Using expert wisdom and
  51. research to frame educational practice. Education Sciences, 12(10), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728
  52. Sooknanan, J., & Seemungal, T. (2023). Math-ematics education in the time of COVID-19: a public health emergency exacerbat-ed by misinterpretation of data. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications an In-ternational Journal of the IMA, 42(4), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrac025
  53. Stahl, N. A., & King, J. R. (2020). Expanding Approaches for Research: Understanding and Using Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research. Journal of Developmental Edu-cation, 44(1), 26–28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45381095
  54. Stratton, S. J. (2023). Population Sampling: Probability and Non-Probability Tech-niques. Prehospital and Disaster Medi-cine, 38(2), 147–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x23000304
  55. Tawfik, A. A., Gishbaugher, J. J., Gatewood, J., & Arrington, T. L. (2021). How K-12 teach-ers Adapt Problem-Based Learning over time. Interdisciplinary Journal of Prob-lem-based Learning, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v15i1.29662
  56. Thomas, G. (2020). How to do your case study: A guide for students and researchers. Sage Publications.
  57. University of Illinois. (2019). Problem-Based Learning (PBL). Illinois.edu; University of Illinois. https://citl.illinois.edu/citl-101/teaching-learning/resources/teaching-strategies/problem-based-learning-(pbl)
  58. Yew, E. H. J., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-Based Learning: an Overview of Its Process and Impact on Learning. Health Professions Education, 2(2), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004 

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic